This study explored the reasons Latin@s join Latino fraternities and Latina sororities at a university in the southwestern United States. Via a phenomenological approach, it uncovered the unique placement of Latino Greek-letter organizations and their role in the success of Latin@ students by embodying the intersectionality of academics, social interaction, accountability, community service, cultural congruency, and brotherhood/sisterhood. Findings highlight the concepts of social isolation, navigation, sense of belonging, Latino culture, and “Not Greek. Latin@ Greek.”
AntonioA. L. (2001). Diversity and the influence of friendship groups in college. Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 63-89.
2.
AstinA. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
3.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
AttinasiL. C. (1989). Getting in: Mexican Americans’ perceptions of university attendance and the implications for freshman year experience. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 247-277.
5.
BartholowB. D.SherK. J.KrullJ. L. (2003). Changes in heavy drinking over the third decade of life as a function of collegiate fraternity and sorority involvement: A prospective, multi level analysis. Health Psychology, 22, 616-626.
6.
BergerJ. B.MilemJ. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40, 641-664.
7.
BoswellA. A.SpadeJ. Z. (1996). Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women?Gender & Society, 10, 133-147.
8.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. M.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BraxtonJ. (2000). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
10.
BurnettJ. R.VaughanM. J.MoodyD. (1997). The importance of person–organization value congruence for female students joining college sororities. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 297-300.
11.
ChangM. J.DeAngeloL. (2002). Going Greek: The effects of racial composition on White students’ participation patterns. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 809-821.
12.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124-130.
15.
DeBardR.LakeT.BinderR. S. (2006). Greeks and grades: The first-year experience. NASPA Journal, 43(1), 56-68.
16.
Education Trust. (2003). Latino achievement in America. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
EstradaF.MejiaA.HufanaA. M. (2017). Brotherhood and college Latinos: A phenomenological study. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 314-337.
18.
FajardoO. (2015). A brief history of international Latin American student fraternities: A movement that lasted 86 years (1889-1975). Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14, 69-81.
19.
GarciaG. A. (2005). The relationship of perceptions of campus climate and social support to adjustment to college for Latina sorority and nonsorority members (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Maryland, College Park.
20.
HarperS. R. (2003). Most likely to succeed: The self-perceived impact of involvement on the experiences of high-achieving African American undergraduate men at predominantly white universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
21.
HayekJ. C.CariniR. M.O’DayP. T.KuhG. D. (2002). Triumph or tragedy: Comparing student engagement levels of members of Greek-letter organizations and other students. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 643-663.
22.
HernandezJ. C. (2002). A qualitative exploration of the first-year experience of Latino college students. NASPA Journal, 40(1), 69-84.
23.
HumphreyS. E.KahnA. S. (2000). Fraternities, athletic teams, and rape: Importance of identification with a risky group. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1313-1322.
24.
HurtadoS.DeyE.TrevinoJ. (1994, April). Exclusion or self-segregation? Interaction across racial/ethnic groups on college campuses. A paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
25.
HurtadoS.EaganM. K.CabreraN. L.LinM. H.ParkJ.LopezM. (2008). Training future scientists: Predicting first-year minority participation in health science research. Research in Higher Education, 49, 126-152.
26.
HurtadoS.HanJ. C.SáenzV. B.EspinosaL. L.CabreraN. L.CernaO. S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Biomedical and behavioral science aspirants’ and minority students’ first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48, 841-887.
27.
HurtadoS.KamimuraM. (2003). Latina/o retention in four-year institutions. In CastellanosJ.JonesL. (Eds.), The majority in the minority: Expanding the representation of Latina/o faculty, administrators, and students in higher education (pp. 139-150). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
28.
KuhG. D.LyonsJ. W. (1990). Fraternities and sororities: Lessons from the College Experiences Study. NASPA Journal, 28(1), 20-29.
29.
KuhG. D.SchuhJ. H.WhittE. J. & Associates. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
MaiselJ. M. (1990). Social fraternities and sororities are not conducive to the educational process. NASPA Journal, 28, 8-12.
31.
MalaneyG. D. (1990). Student attitudes toward fraternities and sororities. NASPA Journal, 28, 37-41.
32.
MartinP. Y.HummerR. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender & Society, 3, 457-473.
33.
MayoJ. R.MurguiaE.PadillaR. V. (1995). Social integration and academic performance among minority university students. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 542-560.
34.
McCabeD. L.BowersW. J. (1996). The relationship between student cheating and college fraternity or sorority membership. NASPA Journal, 33, 280-291.
35.
MilemJ. E. (1994). College, students and racial understanding. Thought & Action, 9(2), 51-92.
36.
MinaL.CabralesJ. A.JuarezC.Rodriguez-VasquezF. (2004). Support programs that work. New Directions for Student Services, 105, 79-88.
37.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
NuwerH. (2001). Wrongs of passage: Fraternities, sororities, hazing, and binge drinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
OlivasM. R. (1996, November). Latina sororities and higher education: The ties that bind. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Studies Association, Montreal, Quebec.
41.
OrozcoV. (2003). Latinas and the undergraduate experience. In CastellanosJ.JonesL. (Eds.), The majority in the minority: Expanding the representation of Latina/o faculty, administrators, and students in higher education (pp. 127-138). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
42.
OrtaD.MurguiaE.CruzC. (2017). From struggle to success via Latina sororities: Culture shock, marginalization, embracing ethnicity, and educational persistence through academic capital. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 18, 41-58. doi:10.1177/1538192717719133
43.
PascarellaE. T.FlowersL.WhittE. J. (2001). Cognitive effects of Greek affiliation in college: Additional evidence. NASPA Journal, 38, 280-301.
44.
PikeG. R. (2000). The influence of fraternity or sorority membership on students’ college experiences and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 41, 117-139.
45.
PikeG. R.AskewJ. W. (1990). The impact of fraternity or sorority membership on academic involvement and learning outcomes. NASPA Journal, 28, 13-19.
46.
PolkinghomeD. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR.HailingS. (Eds.), Existential/phenomenological alternatives in psychology (pp. 41-60). New York, NY: Plenum.
47.
RhoadsR. A. (1995). Whales tales, dog piles, and beer goggles: An ethnographic case study of fraternity life. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26, 306-323.
48.
SidaniusJ.Van LaarC.LevinS.SinclairS. (2004). Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the college campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 96-110.
49.
StorchE. J.StorchJ. B. (2002). Fraternities, sororities, and academic dishonesty. College Student Journal, 36, 247-253.
50.
SuarezS. A.FowersB. J.GarwoodC. S.SzapocznikJ. (1997). Biculturalism, different-ness, loneliness and alienation in Hispanic college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 489-505.
51.
SuttonM. E.LetzringT.TerrellM. C.PoatsL. (2000). Hazing as a form of campus violence. NASPA Journal, 3(1), 34-45.
52.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
53.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). National population estimates, characteristics, national demographic components of change by Hispanic or Latino origin, 2003. Washington, DC: Author.
WechslerH.KuhG.DavenportA. (1996). Fraternities, sororities and binge drinking: Results from a national study of American colleges. NASPA Journal, 33, 260-279.
