This study draws on sociocultural perspectives of identity to understand the ways in which Mexican-origin undergraduate students are recruited into the “figured world” of engineering. The analysis of in-depth, ethnographically situated interviews with 14 participants revealed three sets of recurrent discourses in students’ accounts of their pathways to engineering: discourses about the family and the “choice” to study engineering, discourses about childhood activities tied to engineering aspirations, and discourses about teacher support to become an engineer.
Arbelo-MarreroF.MilacciF. (2016). A phenomenological investigation of the academic persistence of undergraduate Hispanic nontraditional students at Hispanic Serving Institutions. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 15, 22-40.
2.
AudS.FoxM. A.KewalRamaniA. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups (NCES 2010-015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010015.pdf
3.
BartlettL. (2007). Bilingual literacies, social identification, and educational trajectories. Linguistics in Education, 18, 215-231.
4.
BecerraD. (2010). Differences in perceptions of barriers to college enrollment and the completion of a degree among Latinos in the United States. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 9, 187-201.
5.
CamachoM. M.LordS. M. (2013a). The borderlands of education: Latinas in engineering. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
CamachoM. M.LordS. M. (2013b). Latinos and the exclusionary space of engineering education. Latino Studies, 11, 103-112.
7.
CarterD. F. (2006). Key issues in the persistence of underrepresented minority students. New Directions for Institutional Research, 130, 33-46.
8.
DeAngeloL.FrankeR.HurtadoS.PryorJ. H.TranS. (2011). Completing college: Assessing graduation rates at four-year institutions. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.
9.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
FisherT. A.PadmawidjajaI. (1999). Parental influences on career development perceived by African American and Mexican American college students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 27, 136-152.
11.
GeeJ. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: An introduction. Journal of Education, 17, 5-17.
12.
GeeJ. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
13.
GeeJ. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis (2nd edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
HollandD.LachicotteW.SkinnerD.CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
KinzieJ.GonyeaR.ShoupR.KuhG. D. (2008). Promoting persistence and success of underrepresented students: Lessons for teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 115, 21-38.
17.
KolmosA.MejlgaardN.HaaseS.HolgaardJ. E. (2013). Motivational factors, gender, and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38, 340-358.
LandivarL. C. (2013). Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin (American Community Survey Reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
20.
LordS. M.CamachoM. M.LaytonR. A.LongR. A.OhlandM. W.WasburnM. H. (2009). Who’s persisting in engineering? A comparative analysis of male and female Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15, 167-290.
21.
MillerJ. D.KimmelL. G. (2012). Pathways to a STEMM profession. Peabody Journal of Education, 87, 26-45.
22.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
23.
NugentG.BarkerB.WelchG.GrandgenettN.WuC.NelsonC. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1067-1088.
24.
PascarellaE. T.PiersonC. T.WolniakG. T.TerenziniP. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 249-284.
25.
PearsonW.MillerJ. D. (2012). Pathways to an engineering career. Peabody Journal of Education, 87, 46-61.
26.
StevensR.O’ConnorB.GarrisonL.JocunsA.AmosD. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 355-368.
27.
TrustyJ.PlataM.SalazarC. F. (2003). Modeling Mexican Americans’ educational expectation: Longitudinal effects of variables across adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 131-153.
28.
UrrietaL. (2007). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to the special issue. Urban Review, 39, 107-116.
29.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
30.
WhistonS. C.KellerB. K. (2004). The influences of the family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 493-568.
