Research has shown the benefits of undergraduate research; however, few studies have examined mentors of undergraduate researchers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the practices of mentors who have successfully mentored Hispanic undergraduate researchers. Findings from this study suggested that mentors should focus on interacting with students, listen to and understand students’ interests, be organized, require students to be responsible, and monitor students’ work. Recommendations for practice and research have been provided.
AudS.Wilkinson-FlickerS.KristapovichP.RathbunA.WangX.ZhangJ. (2013). The condition of education 2013 (NCES 2013-037). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
2.
BowmanR. L.BowmanV. E. (1990). Mentoring in a graduate counseling program: Students helping students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 30, 58-65.
3.
BrownM. C.DavisG. L.McClendonS. A. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths, models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74, 105-118.
4.
CampbellT. A.CampbellD. E. (1997). Faculty/student mentor programs: Effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38, 727-742.
5.
CastellanosJ.GloriaA. M. (2007). Research considerations and theoretical application for best practices in higher education: Latina/os achieving success. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6, 378-396. doi:10.1177/1538192707305347
6.
CavendishS. E. (2007). Mentoring matters: The influence of social support and relational maintenance strategies on critical outcomes in doctoral education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington.
7.
ChoM.AugerG. (2013). Exploring determinants of relationship quality between students and their academic department: Perceived relationship investment, student empowerment, and student-faculty interaction. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68, 255-268.
8.
ClewellB. C.De CohenC. C.TsuiL.ForcierL.GaoE.YoungN.. . . WestC. (2005). Final report on the evaluation of the National Science Foundation Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation Program. Washington, DC: Program for Evaluation and Equity Research, The Urban Institute.
9.
ColbyS. L.OrtmanJ. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060 (Current Population Reports, P25-1143). Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
CrispG.CruzI. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research on Higher Education, 50, 525-545.
12.
DalkeyN. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
13.
DalkeyN. C. (2002). Toward a theory of group estimation. In LinstoneH. A.TuroffM. (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (pp. 231-256). Newark, NJ: Institute of Technology.
14.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
15.
FryR. (2004). Latino youths finishing college: The role of selective pathways (Pew Hispanic Center report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485329.pdf
16.
GloriaA. M.RodriguezE. R. (2000). Counseling Latino university students: Psychosociocultural issues for consideration. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 145-154.
17.
GolianL. M.GalbraithM. W. (1996). Effective mentoring programs for professional library development. In WilliamsD. E.GartenE. D. (Eds.), Advances in library administration and organization (Vol. 14, pp. 95-124). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18.
GreeneK. V. (2007). Alumni perceptions of the McNair Scholars Program at Kansas universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan.
19.
GrimmettM. A. S.BlissJ. R.DavisD. M. (1998). Assessing Federal TRIO McNair Program participants’ expectations and satisfaction with project services: A preliminary study. The Journal of Negro Education, 67, 404-415.
20.
HarderA.PlaceN. T.ScheerS. D. (2010). Towards a competency-based extension education curriculum: A Delphi study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 51(3), 44-52. doi:10.5032/jae.2010.03044
21.
HathawayR. S.NagdaB. A.GregermanS. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 614-631.
22.
HelmerO. (1966). Social technology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
23.
HsuC. C.SandfordB. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12, Article 10.
24.
IshiyamaJ. (2007). Expectations and perceptions of undergraduate research mentoring: Comparing first generation, low income White/Caucasian and African American students. College Student Journal, 41, 540-549.
25.
JohnsonW. B. (2007). On being a mentor: A guide for higher education faculty. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
JonesM. T.BarlowA. L.VillarejoM. (2010). Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology. Journal of Higher Education, 81, 82-115.
27.
KramK. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608-625.
28.
LandrumR.NelsenL. R. (2002). The undergraduate research assistantship: An analysis of the benefits. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 15-19.
29.
LlagasC.SnyderT. D. (2003). Status and trends in the education of Hispanics (NCES 2003-008). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
30.
LopattoD. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 23, 139-142.
31.
LopattoD. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3, 270-277. doi:10.0087/cbe.04-07-0045
32.
LopattoD. (2006). Undergraduate research as a catalyst for liberal learning. Peer Review, 8(1), 22-25.
33.
LopattoD. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. Life Sciences Education, 6, 297-306. doi:10:1187/cbe.07-06-0039
34.
LudwigB. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology?Journal of Extension, 35(5), 1-4.
35.
LunaG.CullenD. (1998). Do graduate students need mentoring?College Student Journal, 32, 322-330.
36.
LussierR. N.AchuaC. F. (2010). Leadership: Theory, application, & skill development (4th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
37.
MartinM. J.FritzscheJ. A.BallA. L. (2006). A Delphi study of teachers’ and professionals’ perceptions regarding the impact of the No Child Left Behind legislation on secondary agricultural education programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(1), 100-109. doi:10.5032/jae.2006.01101
38.
MazerJ. P.MurphyR. E.SimondsC. J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56, 1-17. doi:10.1080/03634520601009710
MyersB. E.DyerJ. E.WashburnS. G. (2005). Problems facing beginning agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(3), 47-55. doi:10.5032/jae.2005.03047
42.
MyersW. S. (1995). Teaching through mentoring. Women in Business, 47(6), 38.
43.
NagdaB. A.GregermanS. R.JonidesJ.von HippelW.LernerJ. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Review of Higher Education, 22, 55-72.
44.
National Research Council. (2006). Multiple origins, uncertain destinies: Hispanics and the American future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
45.
NorthouseP. G. (2013). The nature of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T.HibelJ. (1978). Student-faculty interactional settings and their relationship to predicted academic performance. The Journal of Higher Education, 49, 450-463.
47.
RussellS. H.HancockM. P.McCulloughJ. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548-549.
48.
SeymourE.HunterA.LaursenS. L.DeantoniT. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88, 493-534.
49.
ShinnG. C.WingenbachG. J.BriersG. E.LindnerJ. R.BakerM. (2009). Forecasting doctoral–level content in international agricultural and extension education–2010: Viewpoint of fifteen engaged scholars. Journal of International Agricultural & Extension Education, 16, 57-71. doi:10.5191/jiaee.2009.16105
50.
StogdillR. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York, NY: Free Press.
51.
StrausS. E.JohnsonM. O.MarquezC.FeldmanM. D. (2013). Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: A qualitative study across two academic health centers. Academic Medicine, 88, 82-89.
52.
SwailW. S.CabreraA. F.LeeC.WilliamsA. (2005). Latino students and the educational pipeline. Washington, DC: Educational Policy Institute.
53.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
54.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cure of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
TouchstoneA. J. L. (2015). Professional development needs of beginning agricultural education teachers in Idaho. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56, 170-187. doi:10.5032/jae.2015.02170
56.
TuroffM.HiltzS. R. (1996). Computer based Delphi process. In AdlerM.ZiglioE. (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (pp. 56-88). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
57.
UlschakF. L. (1983). Human resource development: The theory and practice of need assessment. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.
58.
WagnerJ. M. (2015). Hispanic minority college students at selective colleges: What matters with degree completion?Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14, 303-326. doi:10.1177/1538192714568807
59.
ZimmermanB. B.PaulD. (2007). Technical communication teachers as mentors in the classroom: Extending an invitation to students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 175-200.