An understudied topic is the social experiences of college Latinos. In this study, six men shared their experience of brotherhood or hermandad. Individual interviews yielded qualitative data that were subjected to inductive coding resulting in seven descriptive themes conveying the essence of brotherhood. The findings and implications are discussed in light of extant literature. Study limitations precede discussion on future scholarship that is focused on the postsecondary success of a highly underrepresented student population.
ArciniegaG. M.AndersonT. C.Tovar-BlankZ. G.TraceyT. G. (2008). Towards a fuller conception of machismo: Development of a traditional machismo and caballerismo scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 19-33. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.19
2.
ArredondoP.Gallardo-CooperM.Delgado-RomeroE. A.ZapataA. L. (2014). Culturally responsive counseling with Latinas/os. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
3.
AtkinsonR.FlintJ. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html
4.
BrockiJ. M.WeardenA. J. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 21, 87-108. doi:10.1080/14768320500230185
5.
CerezoA.LydaJ.BeristianosM.EnriquezA.ConnorM. (2013). Latino men in college: Giving voice to their struggles and triumphs. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 352-362. doi:10.1037/a0029646
6.
CharmazK. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook in qualitative research (pp. 359-380). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
ChickeringA. W.ReisserL. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
ClarkM. A.PonjuanL.OrrockJ.WilsonT.FloresG. (2013). Support and barriers for Latino male students’ educational pursuits: Perceptions of counselors and administrators. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91, 458-466. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00118.x
Collins Spanish Dictionary. (2009). Collins Spanish unabridged dictionary (9th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
DarderA. (2012). Culture and power in the classroom: Educational foundation for the schooling of bicultural students. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
13.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
EstradaF.ArciniegaG. M. (2015). Positive masculinity among Latino men and the direct and indirect effects on well-being. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 43, 191-205. doi:10.1002/jmcd.12014
15.
Excelencia in Education. (2015). The conditions of Latinos in education: 2015 factbook. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
GarrodA.KilkennyR.GomezC. (2007). Mi voz, mi vida: Latino college students tell their life stories. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
GriefG. L. (2006). Male friendships: Implications from research for family therapy. Family Therapy, 33, 1-15.
18.
GriffithD. M.GunterK.WatkinsD. C. (2012). Measuring masculinity in research on men of color: Findings and future directions. American Journal of Public Health, 102(Suppl. 2), S187-S194. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300715
19.
GuardiaJ. R.EvansN. J. (2008). Factors influencing the ethnic identity development of Latino fraternity members at a Hispanic serving institution. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 163-181. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0011
20.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
HarperS. R.HarrisF., III. (Eds.). (2010). College men and masculinities: Theory, research, and implications for practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
HaysD. G.SinghA. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in educational and clinical settings (1st ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
23.
HillC. E. (2009). Helping skills: Facilitating exploration, insight, and action (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (2012). Future research on Hispanic students: What have we yet to learn? “and” What new and diverse perspectives are needed to examine Latino success in higher education? [White paper]. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537725.pdf
KaplanD.RosenmannA. (2014). Toward an empirical model of male homosocial relatedness: An investigation of friendship in uniform and beyond. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15, 12-21. doi:10.1037/a0031289
27.
KaplanD.YanayN. (2006). Fraternal friendships and commemorative desire. Social Analysis, 50, 127-146. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23181945
28.
KiselicaM. S.Englar-CarlsonM. (2010). Identifying, affirming, and building upon male strengths: The positive psychology/positive masculinity model of psychotherapy with boys and men. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 276-278. doi:10.1037/a0021159
29.
KvaleS. (1996). The researcher as learner. In RossmanG. B.RallisS. F. (Eds.), Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 33-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
LakerJ.DavisJ. (2011). Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
LeCompteM. D.SchensulJ. J. (2010). Designing and conducting ethnographic research: An introduction (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
32.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
MahalikJ. R.GoodG. E.Englar-CarlsonM. (2010). Masculinity scripts, presenting concerns, and help seeking: Implications for practice and training. In HarperS. R.HarrisF. (Eds.), College men and masculinities: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 77-96). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
MillsG. E.GayL. R. (2016). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (11th ed.). Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Pearson.
35.
MitchellD. (Ed.). (2014). Intersectionality and higher education: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
36.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Higher education: Gap in access and persistence study. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012046.pdf
OjedaL.NavarroR. L.MoralesA. (2011). The role of la familia on Mexican American men’s college persistence intentions. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12, 216-229. doi:10.1037/a0020091
42.
O’NeilJ. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of research on men’s gender role conflict using the Male Gender Role Conflict Scale: New research paradigms and implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 358-445. doi:10.1177/0011000008317057
43.
Piña-WatsonB.OjedaL.CastellonN. E.DornheckerM. (2013). Familismo, ethnic identity, and bicultural stress as predictors of Mexican American adolescents’ positive psychological functioning. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 1, 204-217. doi:10.1037/lat0000006
44.
RossmanG. B.RallisS. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
45.
Santiago-RiveraA. L.ArredondoP.Gallardo-CooperM. (2002). Multicultural Aspects of Counseling Series, 17: Counseling Latinos and la familia: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
SmithJ. A.OsbornM. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53-80). London, England: SAGE.
47.
SueD. W.SueD. (Eds.). (2012). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
