This study focuses on Texas Borderland students admitted through the Texas Top 10% admissions policy, which assumes that Top 10% students are college ready for any public university and provides Top 10% high school graduates automatic admission to any 4-year public university in Texas. Using descriptive and inferential statistics, results indicated significant differences between top-tier and Borderland Universities in access and success by ethnicity, gender, family income, and college generation status.
AlonS.TiendaM. (2005). Assessing the “mismatch” hypothesis: Differences in college graduation rates by institutional selectivity. Sociology of Education, 78, 294-315.
2.
AyresI.BrooksR. (2005). Does affirmative action reduce the number of Black lawyers?Stanford Law Review, 57, 1807-1855.
3.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. W.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
ChambersD. L.ClydesdaleT. T.KidderW. C.LempertR. O. (2005). The real impact of eliminating affirmative action in American law schools: An empirical critique of Richard Sander’s study. Stanford Law Review, 57, 1855-1899.
5.
CrottyM. (2004). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London, England: SAGE.
6.
DominaT. (2007). Higher education policy as secondary school reform: Texas public high schools after Hopwood. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 200-217.
7.
FischerM. J.MasseyD. S. (2007). The effects of affirmative action in higher education. Social Science Research, 36, 531-549.
8.
Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 09-50822 (5th Cir. 2014).
9.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
10.
HarrisA.TiendaM. (2010). Minority higher education pipeline: Consequences of changes in college admissions policy in Texas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627, 60-81.
11.
Hopwood v. State of Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir. 1996).
12.
HowellJ. S. (2010). Assessing the impact of eliminating affirmative action in higher education. Journal of Labor Economics, 28, 113-166.
13.
KimY. K.RennickL. A.FrancoM. A. (2014). Latino students at highly selective institutions: A comparison of their college experiences and outcomes to other racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 13, 245-268.
14.
LongM. C.TiendaM. (2008). Winners and losers: Changes in Texas university admissions post-Hopwood. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 255-280.
15.
LULAC v. Richards, 868 S.W.2d 306 (1993).
16.
NiuS.TiendaM.CortesK. E. (2006). College selectivity and the Texas top 10% law. Economics of Education Review, 25, 259-272.
17.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
18.
PernaL. W.ThomasS. L. (2008). Theoretical perspective on student success: Understanding the contributions of the disciplines. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(1), 1-87.
19.
SantiagoD. A. (2007). Choosing Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs): A closer look at Latino students’ college choices. Washington, DC: Excelencia in Education.
SodenD. L. (2006). At the cross roads: US/Mexico border counties in transition. El Paso: The University of Texas, Institute for Policy and Economic Development. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/iped_techrep/27/
23.
Texas House Bill 588, 75th Leg., Education Code §51.801-.807 (1997).
24.
Texas House Bill 3015, 77th Leg., Education Code §54.0513 (2001).
25.
Texas House Bill 1403, 78th Leg., Education Code § 54.052(j) (2003).
26.
Texas Senate Bill 1528, 79th Leg., Education Code §54.052-.056 (2005).
27.
Texas Senate Bill 175, 81st Leg., Education Code §51.801-.807 (2009).
28.
TiendaM.NiuS. (2006). Capitalizing on segregation, pretending neutrality: College admissions and the Texas top 10% law. American Law and Economics Review, 8, 312-346.
29.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2000). Toward an understanding of percentage plans in higher education: Are they effective substitutes for affirmative action? Retrieved from http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/percent/stmnt.htm
ValenciaR. R. (2008). Chicano students and the courts: The Mexican American legal struggle for educational equality. New York: New York University Press.
32.
Vazquez HeiligJ.RodríguezC.SomersP. (2011). Immigrant DREAMs: English learners, the Texas 10% admissions plan, and college academic success. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10, 106-126.
