This article examines how high-stakes testing policies can constrain the way teachers at predominately Latina/o high schools teach literacy and subsequently influence the success of Latina/o students at college. It is based on a year and a half study of seven Latina/o students making transition from a high school to a community college or university on the U.S.–Mexico border.
AbediJ. (2004). The no child left behind act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4-14.
2.
AbediJ.HofstetterC. H.LordC. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 1-28.
3.
AssafL. (2006). One reading specialist’s response to high-stakes testing pressures. The Reading Teacher, 60(2), 158-167.
4.
AmbrosioJ. (2004). No child left behind: The case of Roosevelt High School. The Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 709-712.
5.
BeckS. W.JefferyJ. V. (2007). Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence. Assessing Writing, 12, 60-79.
6.
Booher-JenningsJ. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 231-268.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1986). The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. In CollinsR.CurranJ.GarnhamN.ScannellP.SchelsingerP.SparksC. (Eds.), Media, culture, and society: A critical reader (pp. 131-163). London, UK: Sage.
Causey-BushT. (2005). Keep your eye on Texas and California: A look at testing, school reform, no child left behind, and implications for students of color. Journal of Negro Education, 74, 332-343.
11.
DeeT. S.JacobB. (2011). The impact of no child left behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 418-446.
12.
DesimoneL. M.SmithT. M.FrisvoldD. (2007). Has NCLB improved teacher and teaching quality for disadvantaged students? In GamoranA. (Ed.), Standards-based reform and the poverty gap: Lessons for no child left behind (pp. 89-119). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
FarkasG.DurhamR. E. (2007). The role of tutoring in standards-based reform. In GamoranA. (Ed.), Standards-based reform and the poverty gap: Lessons for no child left behind (pp. 201-228). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
15.
FryR. A. (2005). The high schools Hispanics attend: Size and other key characteristics. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
16.
GebhardM.DemersJ.Castillo-RosenthalZ (2008). Teachers as critical text analysts: L2 literacies and teachers’ work in the context of high-stakes school reform. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 274-291.
17.
HamiltonL. S. (2007). Standards-based accountability under No Child Left Behind: Experiences of teachers and administrators in three states. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
18.
HardyC. (2008). Hysterisis. In GrenfellM. (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 131-48). Durham, UK: Acumen.
19.
IrizarryJ. G. (2012). Los caminos: Latino/a youth forging pathways in pursuit of higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11, 291-309.
20.
JimenezR. T. (2003). Literacy and Latino students in the United States: Some considerations, quesitons, and new directions. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 122-128.
21.
KirstM.VeneziaA. (2001). Bridging the great divide between secondary schools and postsecondary education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 92-97.
22.
LeeJ.WongK. K. (2004). The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 797-832.
23.
LekiI. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
MatonK. (2008). Habitus. In GrenfellM. (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 49-66). Durham, UK: Acumen.
25.
McCartheyS. J. (2008). The impact of No Child Left Behind on teachers’ writing instruction. Written Communication, 25, 462-505.
26.
National Council of Teachers of English Executive Committee. (2007). NCLB: Key components of informed debate and action. Language Arts, 84, 486-489.
27.
National Education Association. (n.d.). Our positions & actions on NCLB. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/1213.htm
28.
OlivaM. (2008). Latino access to college: Actualizing the promise and potential of K-16 partnerships. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7(2), 119-130.
29.
PaulD. G. (2004). The train has left: The No Child Left Behind Act leaves Black and Latino literacy learners waiting at the station. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47, 648-656.
30.
PenningtonJ. L. (2007). Reviewing NCLB through the figured worlds of policy and teaching: Creating a space for teacher agency and improvisation. Language Arts, 84, 465-474.
31.
RobertsS. (2008, August14). In a generation, minorities may be the U.S. majority. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
32.
RueckerT. (2012). Writing across institutions: Studying the curricular and extracurricular journeys of Latina/o students transitioning from high school to college (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com
SternglassM. (1997). Time to know them. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
StringfieldS. C.Yakimowski-SrebnickM. E. (2005). Promise, progress, problems, and paradoxes of three phases of accountability: A longitudinal case study of the Baltimore City public schools. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 43-75.
36.
SuskindD. C. (2007). Going public: NCLB and literacy practices in teacher education. Language Arts, 84, 450-455.
ThomsonP. (2008). Field. In GrenfellM. (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 67-81). Durham, UK: Acumen.
39.
TrimburJ. (1991). Literacy and the discourse of crisis. In BullockR.TrimburJ. (Eds.), The politics of writing instruction: Postsecondary (pp. 277-295). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
40.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Population and housing profile: 2005-2009 (American Community Survey). Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov
41.
ZimmerR.GillB.BookerK.LockwoodJ. R.III. (2007). State and local implementation of the “No Child Left Behind Act.”Volume I—Title I school choice, supplemental educational services, and student achievement. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
