Using critical race theory and quantitative criticalist stance, this study examines the construct validity of an engagement survey, Student Experiences in the Research University (SERU) for Latino college students through exploratory factor analysis. Results support the principal seven-factor SERU model. However subfactors exhibited differential structure patterns suggesting sense of agency, initiative-taking, self-competency, and self-efficacy as a means of reflecting potential cultural nuances relative to Latinos. Implications highlight sociocultural values and perspectives to understand engagement based on Latino students’ unique college experiences and meaning making.
AncisJ. R.SedlacekW. E.MohrJ. J. (2000). Student perceptions of campus cultural climate by race. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78(2), 180-185.
2.
AronsonJ.SteeleC. M. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 436-456). New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BensimonE. M. (2004). The diversity scorecard: A learning approach to institutional change. Change, 36(1), 45-52.
5.
CampbellC. M.CabreraA. F. (2011). How sound is NSSE? Investigating the psychometric properties of NSSE at a public, research-extensive institution. Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 77-103.
6.
Center for Studies in Higher Education (2011). Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) survey. Retrieved from http://cshe.berkeley.edu/research/seru/
7.
ChatmanS. (2008). Campus climate and diversity: Checking differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Association for Institutional Research at Pasadena, CA.
8.
ChatmanS. (2009). Factor structure and reliability of the 2008 and 2009 SERU/UCUES questionnaire core. (SERU Project Technical Report). Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
9.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
de CordovaH. G.HerzonC. (2007). From diversity to educational equity: A Discussion of academic integration and issues facing underprepared UCSC students. (Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.16.07). Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
11.
DensonN.ChangM. J. (2009). Racial diversity matters: The impact of diversity-related student engagement and institutional context. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 322-353. doi:10.3102/0002831208323278
12.
DimitrovD. M. (2012). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
13.
DowdA. C.SawatzkyM.KornR. (2011). Theoretical foundations and a research agenda to validate measures of intercultural effort. Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 17-44.
14.
EasleyN.BiancoM.LeechN. (2012). Ganas: A qualitative study examining Mexican heritage students’ motivation to succeed in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11(2), 164-178.
15.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2005). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 12.0 update (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
GloriaA. M.CastellanosJ. (2012). Desafios y bendiciones: A Multiperspective examination of the educational experiences and coping responses of first-generation college Latina students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11(1), 82-99.
17.
HarperS. R.QuayeS. J. (2008). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. London, UK: Routledge.
18.
HelmE. G.SedlacekW. E.PrietoD. O. (1998). The relationship between attitudes toward diversity and overall satisfaction of university students by race. Journal of College Counseling, 1(2), 111-120.
19.
HernandezE. (2012). The journey towards developing political consciousness through activism for Mexican American women. Journal of College Student Development, 53(5), 680-701.
20.
HurtadoS.CarterD. F.SpulerA. (1996). Latino student transition to college: Assessing difficulties and factors in successful college adjustment. Research in Higher Education, 37(2), 135-157.
21.
KimY. K.SaxL. J. (2009). Student-faculty interactions in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437-459.
22.
KuhG. D. (2003). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
23.
KuhG. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.
24.
LaNasaS. M.CabreraA. F.TransgurdH. (2009). The construct validity of student engagement: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 315-332.
25.
LongerbeamS. D.SedlacekW. E.AlatorreH. M. (2004). In their own voices: Latino student retention. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 41(3), 538-550.
26.
MoralesA.HerreraS.MurryK. (2009). Navigating the waves of social and political capriciousness: Inspiring perspectives from DREAM-eligible immigrant students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10(3), 266-283.
27.
NoraA. (2003). Access to higher education for Hispanic students: Real or illusionary? In CastellanosJ.JonesL. (Eds.), The majority in the minority: Expanding the representation of Latina/o faculty, administrators and students in higher education (pp. 47-68). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
28.
NuñezA-M. (2009). Latino students’ transitions to college: A social and intercultural capital perspective. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 22-48.
29.
OlivasM. A. (2011). If you build it, they will assess it (or, and open letter to George Kuh, with love and respect). Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 1-15.
30.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
PikeG. R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40(3), 269-284.
32.
PikeG. R.SchroederC. C.BerryT. R. (1997). Enhancing the educational impact of residence halls: The relationship between residential learning communities and first-year college experiences and persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38(6), 609-621.
33.
PrósperoM.RussellA. C.Vohra-GuptaS. (2012). Effects of motivation on educational attainment: Ethnic and developmental differences among first-generation students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11(1), 100-119.
34.
RankinS. R.ReasonR. D. (2005). Differing perceptions: How students of color and White students perceive campus climate for underrepresented groups. Journal of College Student Development, 46(1), 43-61.
35.
RendónL. I.JalomoR. E.NoraA. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In BraxtonJ. M. (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127-156). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
36.
RoithmayrD. (1999). Introduction to critical race theory in educational research and praxis. In ParkerL.DeyleD.VillenasS. (Eds.), Race is . . . race isn’t—Critical race theory and qualitative studies in education (pp. 1-6). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
37.
SantiagoD.CallanP. (2010). Ensuring America’s future: Benchmarking Latino college completion to meet national goals: 2010-2020. Washington, DC: Excelencia in Education.
38.
SedlacekW. E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
SolórzanoD. G. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 121-136.
41.
SolórzanoD. G.VillalpandoO.OsegueraL. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race theory analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(3), 272-294.
42.
StageF. K. (2007). Answering critical questions using quantitative data. In StageF. K. (Ed.), New directions for institutional research (Vol. 133, pp. 5-16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
StebletonM. J.HuesmanR. L.Jr.KuzhabekovaA. (2010). Do I belong here? Exploring immigrant college student responses on the SERU survey sense of belonging/satisfaction factor. (Research and Occasional Paper Series. CSHE 13.10). Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
44.
SteeleC. M. (1998). Stereotyping and its threat are real. American Psychologist, 53(6), 680-681.
45.
SueD. W.IveyA. E.PedersenP. B. (1996). A theory of multicultural counseling and therapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
46.
TerenziniP. T.PascarellaE. T.BlimlingG. S. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 149-162.
47.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
TiendaM. (2009). Hispanicity and educational inequality: Risks, opportunities and the nation’s future. Princeton, NJ: American Association of Hispanics in Higher Education, Educational Testing Service.
49.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
TorresV. (2009). The developmental dimensions of recognizing racism. Journal of College Student Development, 50(5), 504-520.
51.
TorresV.HernandezE. (2007). The influence of ethnic identity on self-authorship: A longitudinal study of Latino/a college students. Journal of College Student Development, 48(5), 558-573.
52.
TorresV.ReiserA.LePeauL.DavisL.RuderJ. (2006). A model of first-generation Latina/o college students’ approach to seeking academic information. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 26(2), 65-70.
53.
ValdézG. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distance between culturally diverse families and schools, an ethnographic portrait. New York, NY: Teachers College.
54.
Wolf-WendelL.WardK.KinzieJ. (2009). A tangled web of terms: The overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 407-428.
55.
ZhaoC.DouglassJ. A. (2012). The International student diversity effect: A profile of a global movement of talent at a group of major U.S. universities. Higher Education Forum, 9, 29-44.
