This article explains two components in the review process of a university’s principal preparation program. A superintendents’ focus group session and an analysis of other universities’ program profiles revealed a need to eliminate dated courses, include certification in the degree requirements, update the program curriculum with best practice, standards-based content and skills sets needed to succeed in the predominantly Hispanic schools, and create flexible schedules to accommodate the students’ home and professional lives.
ArcherJ. (2005). Study blasts leadership programs. Education Week, 24(27), 1-18.
2.
AzzamA. (2005). The unprepared administrator. Educational Leadership, 62(8), 88-89.
3.
BanksJ. A.BanksC. A. (2010). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
4.
BartonP. E. (2004). Why does the gap persist?Educational Leadership, 62(3), 8-13.
5.
BernhardtV. L. (2009). Data, data everywhere: Bringing all the data together for continuous school improvement. New York, NY: Eye on Education.
6.
BetsJ. R.ZauA. C.RiceA. A. (2003). Determinants of student achievement: New evidence from San Diego. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
7.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
8.
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
9.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD.OrrM. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Executive summary. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
10.
DiPaolaM. F.HoyW. F. (2008). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
11.
FarkasS.JohnsonJ.DuffettA. (2003). Rolling up their sleeves: Superintendents and principals talk about what’s needed to fix public schools. New York, NY: Public Agenda.
12.
FergusonR. (2001). Cultivating new routines that foster high achievement for all students: How researchers and practitioners can collaborate to reduce the minority achievement gap. Educational Research Service Spectrum, 19(4), 34-41.
13.
FullerE. (2001). Inequality of educational opportunity? The distribution of Properly certified teachers in Texas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin, TX.
14.
GlickmanC. D. (2002). Leadership for learning: How to help teachers succeed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
15.
GlickmanC. D.GordonS. P.Ross-GordonJ. M. (2009). The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
MartinG. E.PapaR. (2008). Examining the principal preparation and practice gap. Principal, 88(1), 12-14.
20.
MarzanoR. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21.
MarzanoR. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22.
MarzanoR. J.WatersT.McNultyB. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Status and trends in the education of Hispanics (NCES 2003-008). Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
24.
OrrM. T. (2006). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nations’s schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 492-499.
RazikT. A.SwansonA. D. (2010). Fundamental concepts of educational and management. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
27.
ReamesE. (2010, October). Shifting paradigms: Redesigning a principal preparation program’s curriculum. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5, (12.5) 436-459.
28.
RobertsM. B. (2008). Instructional practices conducive to the high achievement of Hispanic limited English proficient students on the Texas assessment of knowledge and skills (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, TX.
29.
RostJ. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Praeger.
30.
RumbergerR. W.PalardyG. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative measures of school performance. American Education Research Journal, 42, 1-42.
31.
SchmokerM. (2006). Results now: How we can achieve unprecedented improvement in teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32.
SkrlaL. (2001). Accountability, equity, and complexity. Educational Researcher, 30(4), 15-21.
ValdesG. (2001). Learning and not learning English. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39.
ValladaresM. (2003). Rising to the challenge: Finding solutions to the Hispanic education crisis. Hispanic, 16(7/8), 26-30.
40.
ValverdeL. A.ScribnerK. P. (2001). Latino students: Organizing schools For greater achievement. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 85, 22-31.
41.
WhiteR.LippittR. (1990). Leader behavior and reaction in three “social climates.” In HallJ. (Ed.), Models for management; The structure of competence (2nd ed., pp. 146-172). The Woodlands, TX: Woodstead Press.
42.
YuklG. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
