The study categorizes cultural background knowledge used by Latino students as they read history texts. The analysis revealed that participants made a large amount of connections attributed to their cultural experiential knowledge. The study also suggests reading ability does not limit the amount and quality of connections students make to their culture. The findings can help social studies teachers looking for additional ways to make social studies relevant and engaging for Latino students.
BrozoW. G.Cantu ValerioP.SalazarM. M. (1996). A walk through Gracie’s garden: Literacy and cultural explorations in a Mexican American junior high school. Journal of Adolescent Literacy, 40, 164-170.
2.
Delgado BernalD. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders of and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1) 105-126.
3.
EpsteinT. (2001). Racial identity and young people’s perspectives on social education. Theory Into Practice, 40(1), 42-47.
4.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
FryE. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 265-271.
6.
GarciaS. B.GuerraP. L. (2004). Deconstructing deficit thinking: Working with educators to create more equitable learning environments. Education and Urban Society, 36, 150-168.
7.
GarnerR. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Greenwood.
8.
GonzalezN.MollL. C.AmantiC. (2005). Fund of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
HavilandD.Rodriguez-KiinoD. (2009). Closing the gap: The impact of professional development on faculty attitudes toward culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8, 197-212.
10.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and lessons. Theory Into Practice, 3(2), 132-141.
11.
OughtonH. (2010). Funds of knowledge: A conceptual critique. Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(1), 63-78.
12.
PappamihielN. E.MorenoM. (2011). Retaining Latino students: Culturally responsive instruction in colleges and universities. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10, 331-344.
13.
PressleyM.AfflerbachP. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
ReynoldsR. E.TaylorM.SteffensenM. S.ShireyL. L.AndersonR. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 353-366.
15.
RumelhartD. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In SpiroR.BruceB.BrewerW. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16.
VillenasS.DeyhleD. (1999). Critical race theory and ethnographies challenging the stereotypes: Latino families, schooling, resilience, and resistance. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 413-434.
17.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 8(1), 69-91.
18.
YossoT. J. (2006). Critical race counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline. London, UK: Routledge.
19.
ZipinL. (2009). Dark funds of knowledge, deep funds of pedagogy: Exploring boundaries between lifeworlds and schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30, 317-331.
