Increasingly, colleges and universities value undergraduate educational research experiences, though traditional apprenticeship models may be infeasible due to faculty time and resource limitations. The “embedded researcher” method can provide research experiences to large numbers of students within traditional courses while generating valuable data for faculty. Our implementation of this method at a Hispanic-serving university yielded both high student satisfaction and meaningful research data. Advantages with Hispanic undergraduates, limitations, potential modifications, and future directions are described.
AlfaroE. C.Umaña-TaylorA. J.Gonzales-BackenM. A.BámacaM. Y.ZeidersK. H. (2009). Latino adolescents’ academic success: The role of discrimination, academic motivation, and gender. Journal of adolescence, 32, 941-962.
2.
BaumanS. (2005). The reliability and validity of the brief acculturation rating scale for Mexican Americans–II for children and adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 426-441.
3.
BecerraD. (2010). Differences in perceptions of barriers to college enrollment and the completion of a degree among Latinos in the United States. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 9, 187-201.
CuéllarI.ArnoldB.GonzálezG. (1995). Cognitive referents of acculturation: Assessment of cultural constructs in Mexican Americans. Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 339-356.
6.
DabulA.BernalM.KnightG. (1995). Allocentric and idiocentric self-description and academic achievement among Mexican American and Anglo American adolescents. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 621-630. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
7.
FergusonC. J. (2011). Video games and youth violence: A prospective analysis in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 377-391.
8.
HalgunsethL.IspaJ.RudyD. (2006). Parental control in Latino families: an integrated review of the literature. Child Development, 77, 1282-1297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00934.x
HussM. T.RandallB. A.PatryM.DavisS. F.HansenD. J. (2002). Factors influencing self-rated preparedness for graduate school: A survey of graduate students. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 275-281.
11.
KaufmanK. L. (1993). Sexual history form. Columbus, OH: Children’s Hospital.
12.
KiernieskyN. C. (2005). Undergraduate research in small psychology departments: Two decades later. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 84-90.
13.
ReynoldsW. M. (1982). Development of reliable & valid short forms of the MCSDS. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.
14.
RichardsonC. (1999). Batos, Bolillos, Pochos and Pelados: Class and culture on the South Texas border. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
15.
RichardsonC.ResendizR. (2006). On the edge of the law: Culture, labor and deviance on the South Texas border. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
16.
SadlerT.McKinneyL. (2010). Scientific Research for Undergraduate Students: A Review of the Literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 43-49.
17.
SalganikM. J.HeckathornD. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34, 193-239. doi:10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x
18.
SantiagoD. A. (2011). Excelencia in education: Roadmap for ensuring America’s future by increasing Latino college completion. Washington, DC: Excelencia in Education. Retrieved from http://www.edexcelencia.org/initiatives/EAF/Roadmap
19.
SchindlerV. P. (2011). Using service-learning to teach mental health and research skills. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 25, 54-64. doi:10.3109/07380577.2010.51943010.3109/07380577.2010.519430
20.
SeymourE.HunterA.LaursenS.DeantoniT. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88, 493-534. doi:10.1002/sce.1013110.1002/sce.10131
