This study investigated differences in educational motivation among Hispanic and non-Hispanic first-generation students (FGS). Participants were 315 high school and college students who completed a revised academic motivation survey that measured participants’ educational motivation (intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation). The study found that extrinsic and amotivation were significant predictors of grade point averages (GPAs) among FGS. In addition, high school FGS and Hispanic students were more likely to report higher intrinsic motivation than college FGS and non-Hispanic students. Implications for higher education are discussed.
AlbaneseM. (2000). Problem-based learning: Why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical Education34, 729-738.
2.
AllenD. (1999). Desire to finish college: An empirical link between motivation and persistence. Research and Higher Education, 40, 461-485.
3.
AndermanL. H.MidgleyC. (1998). Motivation and middle school students. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 421281)
4.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review64, 359-375.
6.
BadiozamaniM. G. (1995). Academic intrinsic motivation and achievement related to the home environment of Hispanic children. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: The Humanities and Social Sciences55(11-A), 3448.
7.
BallS. (1984). Student motivation: Some reflections and projections. In AmesR.AmesC. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (pp. 313-326). New York, NY: Academic.
8.
BerryT. H. (2003). Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in a sample of Latino children attending an after-school enrichment program. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: The Sciences and Engineering64(5-B), 2416.
9.
BlackA. E.DeciE. (2000). The effects of instructors’ support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
10.
BrodkinP.WeissM. R. (1990). Developmental differences in motivation for participating in competitive swimming. Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychology12, 248-263.
11.
ChoyS. (2001). Essay: Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED448899)
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CrispG.NoraA.TaggartA. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 924-942.
14.
CrossK. P. (1998, June). Opening windows on learning. Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 356)
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1996). When paradigms clash: Comments on Cameron & Pierce’s claim that rewards do not undermine intrinsic motivation. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 33-38.
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
18.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA.MidgleyC.ReumanD.MacIverD.FeldlauferH. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students’ motivation. Elementary School Journal93, 553-574.
19.
Esprivalo-HarrellP.ForneyW. S. (2003). Ready or not, here we come: Retaining Hispanic and first-generation students in postsecondary education. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 27, 147-156.
20.
ForteirM. S.VallerandR. J.GuayF. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 257-274.
21.
FridayS. S.FridayE. (2003). Racioethnic perceptions of job characteristics and job satisfaction. Journal of Management Development22, 426-442.
22.
GagneM.RyanR. M.BargmanK. (2002). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology15, 372-390.
23.
GándaraP. (1995). Over the ivy walls: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
HudleyC. (1997). Supporting achievement beliefs among ethnic minority adolescents: Two case examples. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7, 133-152.
25.
IshitaniT. T. (2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first-generation students: Time varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44, 433-449.
26.
KarsentiT. P.ThibertG. (1995, April). What type of motivation is truly related to school achievement? A look at 1428 high-school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
27.
LandryJ. B. (2004). Using self-determination theory to understand African-American women’s physical activity patterns. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: The Humanities and Social Sciences65(5-A), 1683.
28.
LewisJ. J. (2004). The independent learning contract system: Motivating students enrolled in college reading courses. Reading Improvement41, 188-194.
29.
McConnellP. J. (2000). ERIC review: What community colleges should do to assist first-generation students. Community College Review, 28(3), 75-88.
30.
McKenzieK.GowK.SchweitzerR. (2004). Exploring first-year academic achievement through structural equation modeling. Higher Education Research & Development23(1), 95-112.
31.
NapolesG. F. (2009, June). Factors associated with engagement levels among entering and returning Hispanic college students (doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest LLC. ISBN: 978-1-1096-1834-1
32.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 235)
NaumannW. C.BandalosD.GutkinT. B. (2003). Identifying variables that predict college success for first-generation students. Journal of College Admission, 181, 4-9.
35.
NomiT. (2005). Faces of the future. A portrait of first-generation college students. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.
36.
NunezA. M.Cuccaro-AlaminS. (1998). First generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education (NCES 98-082). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
37.
OlenchakF. R.HebertT. P. (2002). Endangered academic Talent: Lessons learned from gifted first-generation college males. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 195-212.
38.
OliveT. (2008). Desire for higher education in first-generation Hispanic college students enrolled in an academic support program: A phenomenological analysis. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 39(1), 81-110.
39.
PascarellaE. T.PiersonC. T.WolniakG. C.TerenziniP. T. (2004). First-generation students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 249-284.
40.
PrósperoM.Vohra-GuptaS. (2007). First-generation students: College motivation, integration, & academic achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(12), 963-975.
41.
ReibmanS. E. (2003). Achievement motivation in Latino college students: The role of personality characteristics, acculturation, and familism. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: The Sciences and Engineering63(8-B), 3970.
42.
RumenbergerR. W.GhatakR.PoulosG.RitterP. L.DornbuschS. M. (1990). Family influences on dropout behavior in one California high school. Sociology of Education, 63, 283-299.
43.
SchultzG. F. (1993). Socioeconomic advantage and achievement motivation: Important mediators of academic performance in minority children in urban schools. Urban Review25, 221-232.
44.
StansburyS. L. (1998). The effect of parental education, prior achievement, self-efficacy, goal orientation, and effort of the undergraduate science performance of Latinos and Caucasians. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: The Humanities and Social Sciences59(5-A), 1461.
45.
TerenziniP. T.SpringerL.YaegerP. M.PascarellaE. T.NoraA. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1-21.
46.
ThorneY. M. (1995). Achievement motivation in high achieving Latina women. Roeper Review, 18(1), 44-50.
47.
TsengV. (2004). Family interdependence and academic adjustment in college: Youth from immigrant and U.S.-born families. Child Development75, 966-984.
U. S. Department of Education. (1996). Application for grants under the student support services program. Washington, DC: Author.
50.
ValasH.SovikN. (1993). Variables affecting students’ intrinsic motivation for school mathematics: Two empirical studies on Deci & Ryan’s theory on motivation. Learning and Instruction, 3, 281-298.
51.
VallerandR. J.BissonneteR. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599-620.
52.
VallerandR. J.FortierM.GuayF. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 1161-1176.
53.
VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.BlaisM. R.BriéreN. M.SenécalC.VattiéresE. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017.
54.
VansteenkisteM.LensW.DeciE. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal-contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19-31.
55.
VansteenkisteM.SimonsJ.LensW.SheldonK. M.DeciE. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic role of intrinsic goals and autonomy-support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260.
56.
VansteenkisteM.SimonsJ.LensW.SoenensB.MatosL. (2005). Examining the impact of extrinsic versus intrinsic goal framing and internally controlling versus autonomy- supportive communication style upon early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development, 76, 485-501.
57.
WardP.LundbergN.EllisG.BerrettK. (2010). Adolescent peer followership: A self- determination theory perspective. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(2), 20-35.
58.
YoungA.JohnsonG.HawthorneM.PughJ. (2011). Cultural predictors of academic motivation and achievement: A self-deterministic approach. College Student Journal, 45(1), 151-163.
