Utilizing the notion of community cultural wealth, this study focuses on the various forms of capital that Mexican American students from the South Texas Border draw upon within their community to navigate the college choice process. Findings indicate that neighbors, church members, and in one case, a physician, served as sources of social capital, while students drew upon resistant and aspirational capital to deal with racial and ethnic stereotypes and negative perceptions of local/regional universities.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
2.
BourdieuP. (1980). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
3.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: SAGE.
4.
CabreraA.La NasaS. (2000). Understanding the college-choice process. New Direction for Institutional Research, 107, 5-22.
5.
CejaM. (2001). Applying, choosing, and enrolling in higher education: Understanding the college choice process of first-generation Chicana students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
6.
CejaM. (2004). Chicana college aspirations and the role of parents: Developing resiliency. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(4), 338-362.
7.
CejaM. (2006). Understanding the role of parents and siblings as information sources in the college choice process of Chicana students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 87-104.
8.
ChoyS. P. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (NCES 2001-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
FloresL. Y.ObasiE. M. (2005). Mentors’ influence on Mexican American students’ career and educational development. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33, 146-164.
12.
GonzálezK.StonerC.JovelJ. (2003). Examining the role of social capital in access to college for Latinas: Toward a college opportunity framework. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 2(1), 246-170.
13.
HamptonE. (2005). Standardized or sterilized? Differing perspectives on the effects of high-stakes testing in West Texas. In ValenzuelaA. (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 179-200). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
Hurtado-OrtizM.GauvainM. (2007). Postsecondary education among Mexican American youth: Contributions of parents, siblings, acculturation, and generational status. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 29(2), 181-191.
15.
KurlaenderM. (2006). Choosing community college: Factors affecting Latina/o college choice. New Directions for Community Colleges, 133, 7-16.
16.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
MillerM. (1982). Economic growth and change along the U.S.-Mexican border. Austin, TX: Bureau of Business Research.
19.
NuñezA.-M.Cuccaro-AlaminS. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education (NCES 98-082). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
20.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2004). Brown at 50: King’s dream and Plessy’s nightmare. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
21.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
22.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
23.
PerezP. (2007). Social capital and chain migration: The college choice process of Chicana and Chicano community college, transfer and university students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
24.
PerezP.McDonoughP. (2008). Understanding Latina and Latina/o college choice: A social capital and chain migration analysis. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7(3), 249-265.
25.
PersonA.RosenbaumJ. E. (2006). Chain enrollment and college enclaves: Benefits and drawbacks of Latina/o college students’ enrollment decisions. New Directions for Community Colleges, 133, 51-60.
26.
RosasM.HamrickF. (2002). Postsecondary enrollment and academic decision making: Family influences on women college students of Mexican descent. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(1), 59-69.
27.
SantiagoD. A. (2008a). Accelerating Latino student success at Texas border institutions: Possibilities and challenges. Washington, DC: Excelencia in Education.
28.
SantiagoD. A. (2008b). Top 25 colleges & universities enrolling Latinos. Washington, DC: Excelencia in Education.
29.
SantiagoD. A. (2008c). Top 25 institutions awarding bachelor’s degrees to Latinos. Washington, DC: Excelencia in Education.
30.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
31.
SharpJ. (1998). Bordering the future: Challenge and opportunity in the Texas border region. A report by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from http://www.window.state.tx.us/border/border.html
32.
SloanK. (2005). Playing to the logic of the Texas Accountability system: How focusing on “ratings”—not children—undermines quality and equity. In ValenzuelaA. (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability Fails Latino youth (pp. 153-178). Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
Stanton-SalazarR. D.SpinaS. U. (2003). Informal mentors and role models in the lives of urban Mexican-origin adolescents. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 34(3), 231-254.
34.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury, Park, CA: SAGE.
35.
Talavera-BustillosV. H. (1998). Chicana college choice and resistance: An exploratory study of first-generation Chicana college students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
36.
TaylorS.BogdanR. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
Texas State Data Center. (2010). Age, sex, and race/ethnicity population projections by migration scenario for Texas counties and regions: Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, Willacy. Retrieved September 8, 2011, from http://idserportal.utsa.edu/sdc/projections/default.aspx
40.
TornatskyL.CutlerR.LeeJ. (2002). College knowledge: What Latina/o parents need to know and why they don’t know it. Los Angeles, CA: The Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.
Vela-GudeL.CavazosJ.Jr.JohnsonM. S.FieldingC.CavazosA. G.CamposL.RodriguezI. (2009). My counselors were never there: Perceptions from Latino college students. Professional School Counseling, 12(4).
46.
ValenzuelaA. (2005). Introduction: The accountability debate in Texas: Continuing the conversation. In ValenzuelaA. (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 1-32). Albany: State University of New York Press.
47.
YamamuraE. K.MartinezM. A.SáenzV. B. (2010). Moving beyond high school expectations: Examining stakeholders’ responsibility for increasing Latina/o students’ college readiness. The High School Journal, 93(3), 126-148.
48.
YossoT. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 8(1), 69-91.
49.
YucelM. (2001). The border economy: Introduction. Dallas, TX: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
