Plans are described for creating a Graduate Record Examination (GRE) test for the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines. Previous work showed that a quantitative measure for the STEM disciplines exacerbated group differences beyond those reflected in the current GRE General Test. A test development approach is described that links the development of the GRE STEM as an admissions test with the development of a learning scaffolding that will describe the skills assessed in the new measure. This learning scaffolding can be used with undergraduate students to help prepare them for the GRE STEM, thus making the test an assessment both of and for learning.
Bordogna, J. (2004, October). Remarks presented at the 10-year anniversary celebration of Greater Philadelphia Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation, Philadelphia.
2.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2004). Enrollment survey. Available from http://www.cgsnet.org/Default.aspx?tabid=168
3.
Educational Testing Service. (n.d.). Mission section. Available from http://www.ets.org
4.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
5.
Graduate Record Examinations Board. (2004). 2004-2005 guide to the use of the GRE. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6.
Kuncel, N. R., Hazlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 162-181.
7.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2002). On the roles of task model variables in assessment design. In S. Irvine & P. Kyllonen (Eds.), Generating items for cognitive tests: Theory and practice (pp. 97-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 1, 3-62.
9.
National Research Council. (1993). Science, technology, and the federal government: National goals for a new era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
National Science Board. (2004). Science & engineering indicators 2004 (NSB 04-1). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
11.
National Science Foundation, Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering. (2004). Broadening participation in America’s science and engineering workforce. Retrieved March 1, 2006, from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/
12.
Siegel, L. (2005, January/February). A study of Ph.D. completion at Duke University. Council of Graduate Schools Communicator, 38(7), 1-2, 6-7. Available from Council of Graduate Schools Web site, http://www.cgsnet.org/PublicationsPolicyRes/index.htm
13.
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (in press). Foreign scholars in US science: Contributions and costs. In R. Ehrenberg & P. Stephan (Eds.), Science and the university. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
