This article examines the challenges associated with improving outcomes in higher education for Latino students. The author reviews data on the underrepresentation of Latinos among top high school students and among top undergraduate students. A discussion of the lack of strategies for increasing the number of high-achieving Hispanic students on the undergraduate level is presented along with a review of strategies that are being developed to increase the number of high achieving Latino undergraduates.
America’s best colleges and universities. (2003). U.S. News & World Report.
2.
Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Braswell, J. S., Lutkus, A. D., Grigg, W. S., Santapau, S. L., Tay-Lim, B., & Johnson, M. (2001). The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
4.
Building Engineering and Science Talent. (2004). A bridge for all: Higher education design principles to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Retrieved from www.bestworkforce.org
5.
Cole, S., & Barber, E. (2003). Increasing faculty diversity: The occupational choices of high-achieving students. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
6.
College Board. (1997). 1997 AP national summary reports. Retrieved from www.apcentral.collegeboard.com
7.
College Board. (2000a). 2000 college-bound seniors: Ethnic and gender profile of SAT and Achievement Test takers for the nation. New York: Author.
8.
College Board. (2000b). 1988 college-bound seniors (recentered): Ethnic and gender profile of SAT and Achievement Test takers for the nation. New York: Author.
9.
College Board. (2003a). Data tables. Retrieved December 1, 2003, from www.collegeboard.com/counselors/hs/sat/scorereport/scoredata.html
10.
College Board. (2003b). 2003 college-bound seniors: A profile of SAT program test takers. New York: Author.
11.
College Board. (2003c). May 2003 administrative date for AP, table for school AP grade distribution by national total for all students and ethnic group. Retrieved from www.apcentral.collegeboard.com
12.
Gándara, P., & Maxwell-Jolly, J. (1999). Priming the pump. New York: National Task Force on Minority High Achievement, College Board.
13.
Grigg, W. S., Daane, M. C., & Campbell, J. R. (2002). The nation’s report card: Reading 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
14.
Horn, L., Peter, K., & Rooney, K. (2002). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. post-secondary educational institutions: 1999-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
15.
Hrabowski, F. A., III, & Maton, K. I. (1995). Enhancing the success of African American students in the sciences: Freshman year outcomes. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 19-27.
16.
Hrabowski, F. A., III, Maton, K. I., & Greif, G. L. (1998). Beating the odds: Raising academically successful African American males. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Klitgaard, R. (1985). Choosing elites. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Lapp, M. S., Grigg, W. S., & Tay-Lin, B. S. H. (2001). The nation’s report card: U.S. history 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
19.
Lutkus, A. D., Weiss, A. R., Campbell, J. R., Mazzeo, J., & Lazer, S. (1999). The NAEP 1998 civics report card for the nation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
20.
Maton, K. I., Hrabowski, F. A., III, & Schmitt, C. L. (2000). African American college students excelling in the sciences: College and postcollege outcomes in the Meyerhoff scholars program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 629-654.
21.
Miller, L. S. (1999). A proposal for improving the quality of AP curriculum and teaching strategies and AP teacher professional development during a period of rapid AP expansion. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from the author at millerls@asu.edu)
22.
Miller, L. S. (2000, September 21). Addressing the minority high achievement and the minority-within-class-achievement gaps. Paper presented at the “Millennium Conference: Achieving High Academic Achievement for All, ” held by the National Academy of Sciences and U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
23.
Miller, L. S. (2004). Promoting sustained growth in the representation of African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans among top students in the United States at all levels of the education system. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
24.
Morgan, R., & Ramist, L. (1998). Advanced placement students in college: An investigation of course grades in 21 colleges. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
25.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2003). Digest of education statistics 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
26.
National Task Force on Minority High Achievement, College Board. (1999). Reaching the top. New York: Author.
27.
O’Sullivan, C. Y., Lauko, M. A., Grigg, W. S., Qian, J., & Zhang, J. (2003). The nation’s report card: Science 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
28.
Persky, H. R., Daane, M. C., & Yin, Y. (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
29.
Ramist, L., Lewis, C., & McCamley-Jenkins, L. (1994). Student group differences in predicting college grades: Sex, language, and ethnic groups. New York: College Board.
30.
Schmidt, P. (2004). Not just for minority students anymore. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved March 19, 2004, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i28/28a01701.htm
31.
Weiss, A. R., Lutkus, A. D., Hildebrant, B. S., & Johnson, M. S. (2001). The nation’s report card: Geography 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
32.
Whittington, D. (2004, April 5). The achievement gap: Should we rely on SAT scores to tell us anything about it?Education and Policy Analysis Archives, 12(12). Retrieved April 15, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n12/
