Abstract

The article “A comprehensive set of postestimation measures to enrich interrupted time-series analysis”, by Ariel Linden (Stata Journal 17: 73–88), contains the following errors.
The formula for computing the treatment group’s difference in trends between the preintervention period and the second-intervention period is incorrectly written as β
3 + β
5 +β
7 +β
9 +β
11, which appears in the eleventh sentence of paragraph 2 on page 77 and in table 1 on page 81. The correct formula is β
3 + β
7 + β
9 + β
11, and the corresponding generic
where trp = treatment period.
The formula for computing the difference between the treatment and control group in the differences in trends of the preintervention period and the second-intervention period is incorrectly written as β
5 + β
7 + β
11, which appears in the last sentence of paragraph 2 on page 77 and in table 1 on page 81. The correct formula is β
7 + β
11, and the corresponding generic
where trp = treatment period.
The changes in these two formulas affect the results of the example, which are presented in table 2 on page 85. The correct
The correct
To clarify how these two estimates are derived, I reproduce figure 1 from Linden (2017) and add text to show the

Multiple-group interrupted time-series analysis with Newey–West standard errors and two intervention periods; added text presents the
The treatment group’s difference in trends between the second-intervention period and the preintervention period is
However,
The difference between the treatment and control group in the differences in trends of the second-intervention period and the preintervention period is
which shortens to
Footnotes
1 Acknowledgment
I thank Kao Ching-yuan for bringing these errors to my attention.
