In settings that exhibit selection on both levels and gains, marginal treatment effects (MTE) allow us to go beyond local average treatment effects and estimate the whole distribution of effects. In this article, I survey the theory behind MTE and introduce the package mtefe, which uses several estimation methods to fit MTE models. This package provides important improvements and flexibility over existing packages such as margte (Brave and Walstrum, 2014, Stata Journal 14: 191–217) and calculates various treatment-effect parameters based on the results. I illustrate the use of the package with examples.
AbadieA., and ImbensG. W.2016. Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica84: 781–807.
2.
AngristJ. D., and ImbensG. W.1995. Two-stage least squares estimation of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity. Journal of the American Statistical Association90: 431–442.
3.
BjörklundA., and MoffittR.1987. The estimation of wage gains and welfare gains in self-selection models. Review of Economics and Statistics69: 42–49.
4.
BraveS., and WalstrumT.2014. Estimating marginal treatment effects using parametric and semiparametric methods. Stata Journal14: 191–217.
5.
BrinchC. N., MogstadM., and WiswallM.2017. Beyond LATE with a discrete instrument. Journal of Political Economy125: 985–1039.
6.
CarneiroP., and HeckmanJ. J.2002. The evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. Economic Journal112: 705–734.
7.
CarneiroP., HeckmanJ. J., and VytlacilE. J.2010. Evaluating marginal policy changes and the average effect of treatment for individuals at the margin. Econometrica78: 377–394.
8.
CarneiroP., HeckmanJ. J., and VytlacilE. J.2011. Estimating marginal returns to education. American Economic Review101: 2754–2781.
9.
CarneiroP., and LeeS.2009. Estimating distributions of potential outcomes using local instrumental variables with an application to changes in college enrollment and wage inequality. Journal of Econometrics149: 191–208.
10.
CarneiroP., LokshinM., and UmapathiN.2017. Average and marginal returns to upper secondary schooling in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Econometrics32: 16–36.
11.
CornelissenT., DustmannC., RauteA., and SchönbergU.2016. From LATE to MTE: Alternative methods for the evaluation of policy interventions. Labour Economics41: 47–60.
12.
CornelissenT., DustmannC., RauteA., and SchönbergU. Forthcoming. Who benefits from universal child care? Estimating marginal returns to early child care attendance. Journal of Political Economy.
13.
FelfeC., and LaliveR.2014. Does early child care help or hurt children's development? Discussion Paper No. 8484, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).http://ftp.iza.org/dp8484.pdf.
14.
HeckmanJ. J., UrzuaS., and VytlacilE. J.2006a. Web supplement to understanding instrumental variables in models with essential heterogeneity: Estimation of treatment effects under essential heterogeneity.http://jenni.uchicago.edu/underiv/documentation_2006_03_20.pdf.
15.
HeckmanJ. J., UrzuaS., and VytlacilE. J.2006b. Understanding instrumental variables in models with essential heterogeneity. Review of Economics and Statistics88: 389–432.
16.
HeckmanJ. J., and VytlacilE. J.1999. Local instrumental variables and latent variable models for identifying and bounding treatment effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences96: 4730–4734.
17.
HeckmanJ. J., and VytlacilE. J.2001. Local instrumental variables. In Nonlinear Statistical Modeling: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics: Essays in Honor of Takeshi Amemiya, ed. HsiaoC., MorimuneK., and PowellJ. L., 1–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HeckmanJ. J., and VytlacilE. J.2005. Structural equations, treatment effects, and econometric policy evaluation. Econometrica73: 669–738.
19.
HeckmanJ. J., and VytlacilE. J.2007. Econometric evaluation of social programs, part II: Using the marginal treatment effect to organize alternative econometric estimators to evaluate social programs, and to forecast their effects in new environments. In Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 6B, ed. HeckmanJ. J., and LeamerE. E., 4875–5143. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20.
ImbensG. W., and AngristJ. D.1994. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica62: 467–475.
21.
KleinR. W., and SpadyR. H.1993. An efficient semiparametric estimator for binary response models. Econometrica61: 387–421.
22.
LokshinM., and SajaiaZ.2004. Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching regression models. Stata Journal4: 282–289.
23.
MaestasN., MullenK. J., and StrandA.2013. Does disability insurance receipt discourage work? Using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects of SSDI receipt. American Economic Review103: 1797–1829.
24.
MatzkinR. L.2007. Nonparametric identification. In Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 6B, ed. HeckmanJ. J., and LeamerE. E., 5307–5368. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25.
MogstadM., and TorgovitskyA.2017. Identification and extrapolation with instrumental variables. Unpublished manuscript.
