Concentration indices are frequently used to measure inequality in one variable over the distribution of another. Most commonly, they are applied to the measurement of socioeconomic-related inequality in health. We introduce the user-written command conindex, which provides point estimates and standard errors of a range of concentration indices. The command also graphs concentration curves (and Lorenz curves) and performs statistical inference for the comparison of inequality between groups. We offer an accessible introduction to the various concentration indices that have been proposed to suit different measurement scales and ethical responses to inequality. We also demonstrate the command's capabilities and syntax by analyzing wealth-related inequality in health and health care in Cambodia.
BleichrodtH., and van DoorslaerE.2006. A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement. Journal of Health Economics25: 945–957.
2.
BosmansK. Forthcoming. Consistent comparisons of attainment and shortfall inequality: A critical examination. Health Economics.
3.
ChenZ. A.2007. concindc: Stata module to calculate concentration index with both individual and grouped data. Statistical Software Components S456802, Department of Economics, Boston College. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456802.html.
4.
ChowG. C.1960. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica28: 591–605.
5.
ClarkeP. M., GerdthamU.-G., JohannessonM., BingeforsK., and SmithL.2002. On the measurement of relative and absolute income-related health inequality. Social Science and Medicine55: 1923–1928.
6.
CloggC. C., PetkovaE., and HaritouA.1995. Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology100: 1261–1293.
7.
DecosterA., and OogheE.2003. Weighting with individuals, equivalent individuals or not weighting at all. Does it matter empirically? In Inequality, Welfare and Poverty: Theory and Measurement, ed. AmielY., and BishopJ. A., vol. 9, 173–190. Amsterdam: JAI.
8.
EdbertU.1997. Social welfare when needs differ: An axiomatic approach. Economica64: 233–244.
9.
ErreygersG.2009a. Can a single indicator measure both attainment and shortfall inequality?Journal of Health Economics28: 885–893.
10.
ErreygersG.2009b. Correcting the concentration index. Journal of Health Economics28: 504–515.
11.
ErreygersG.2009c. Correcting the concentration index: A reply to Wagstaff. Journal of Health Economics28: 521–524.
12.
ErreygersG., ClarkeP., and Van OurtiT.2012. “Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who in this land is fairest of all?”—Distributional sensitivity in the measurement of socioeconomic inequality of health. Journal of Health Economics31: 257–270.
13.
ErreygersG., and Van OurtiT.2011a. Putting the cart before the horse. A comment on Wagstaff on inequality measurement in the presence of binary variables. Health Economics20: 1161–1165.
14.
ErreygersG., and Van OurtiT.2011b. Measuring socioeconomic inequality in health, health care and health financing by means of rank-dependent indices: A recipe for good practice. Journal of Health Economics30: 685–694.
15.
FilmerD., and PritchettL. H.2001. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography38: 115–132.
16.
JenkinsS. P.1988. Calculating income distribution indices from micro-data. National Tax Journal41: 139–142.
17.
JenkinsS. P.1999. ineqdeco: Stata module to calculate inequality indices with decomposition by subgroup. Statistical Software Components S366002, Department of Economics, Boston College. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s366002.html.
18.
JolliffeD., and KrushelnytskyyB.1999. sg115: Bootstrap standard errors for indices of inequality. Stata Technical Bulletin51: 28–32. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 9, pp. 191–196. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
19.
KakwaniN., WagstaffA., and van DoorslaerE.1997. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation, and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics77: 87–103.
20.
KakwaniN. C.1977. Measurement of tax progressivity: An international comparison. Economic Journal87: 71–80.
21.
KakwaniN. C.1980. Income Inequality and Poverty: Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
KjellssonG., and GerdthamU.-G.2013a. Lost in translation: Rethinking the inequality equivalence criteria for bounded health variables. In Research on Economic Inequality, Volume 21: Health and Inequality, ed. DiasP. R., and O'DonnellO., 3–32. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
23.
KjellssonG., and GerdthamU.-G.2013b. On correcting the concentration index for binary variables. Journal of Health Economics32: 659–670.
24.
KolmS.-C.1976. Unequal inequalities. I. Journal of Economic Theory12: 416–442.
25.
LambertP., and ZhengB.2011. On the consistent measurement of attainment and shortfall inequality. Journal of Health Economics30: 214–219.
26.
Lopez-FeldmanA.2005. descogini: Stata module to perform Gini decomposition by income source. Statistical Software Components S456001, Department of Economics, Boston College. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456001.html.
27.
O'DonnellO., van DoorslaerE., WagstaffA., and LindelowM.2008. Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation.Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
28.
PereiraJ. A.1998. Inequality in infant mortality in Portugal, 1971–1991. In Developments in Health Economics and Public Policy, Volume 6: Health, the Medical Profession, and Regulation, ed. ZweifelP., 75–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29.
ShorrocksA. F.1983. Ranking income distributions. Econometrica50: 3–17.
30.
TownsendP., and DavidsonN., eds. 1982. Inequalities in Health: The Black Report.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
31.
van KermP., and JenkinsS. P.2007. Software Updates: Generalized Lorenz curves and related graphs: Update for Stata 7. Stata Journal7: 280.
32.
Van OurtiT.2004. Measuring horizontal inequity in Belgian health care using a Gaussian random effects two part count data model. Health Economics13: 705–724.
33.
WagstaffA.2002. Inequality aversion, health inequalities and health achievement. Journal of Health Economics21: 627–641.
34.
WagstaffA.2005. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Economics14: 429–432.
35.
WagstaffA.2009. Correcting the concentration index: A comment. Journal of Health Economics28: 516–520.
36.
WagstaffA.2011a. The concentration index of a binary outcome revisited. Health Economics20: 1155–1160.
37.
WagstaffA.2011b. Reply to Guido Erreygers and Tom Van Ourti's comment on ‘The concentration index of a binary outcome revisited’. Health Economics20: 1166–1168.
38.
WagstaffA., PaciP., and van DoorslaerE.1991. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Social Science and Medicine33: 545–557.
39.
YitzhakiS.1983. On an extension of the Gini inequality index. International Economic Review24: 617–628.
