Quantifying the Uptake of user-written Commands over Time

Abstract

A major factor in the uptake of new statistical methods is the availability of user-friendly software implementations. One attractive feature of Stata is that users can write their own commands and release them to other users via Statistical Software Components at Boston College. Authors of statistical programs do not always get adequate credit, because programs are rarely cited properly. There is no obvious measure of a program's impact, but researchers are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the impact of their work to funders. In addition to encouraging proper citation of software, the number of downloads of a user-written package can be regarded as a measure of impact over time. In this article, we explain how such information can be accessed for any month from July 2007 and summarized using the new ssccount command.

Keywords

dm0086 ssccount SSC impact

References

Brueton

V. C.

, Vale

C. L.

, Choodari-Oskooei

, Jinks

, and Tierney

J. F.

2014. Measuring the impact of methodological research: A framework and methods to identify evidence of impact. Trials 15: 464.

Cox

D. R.

1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34: 187–220.

Kalbfleisch

J. D.

, and Prentice

R. L.

1980. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York: Wiley.

Leuven

, and Sianesi

2003. psmatch2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Statistical Software Components S432001, Department of Economics, Boston College. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.

Morris

T. P.

, White

I. R.

, and Royston

2014. Tuning multiple imputation by predictive mean matching and local residual draws. BMC Medical Research Methodology 14: 75.

Pullenayegum

E. M.

, Platt

R. W.

, Barwick

, Feldman

B. M.

, Offringa

, and Thabane

2016. Knowledge translation in biostatistics: A survey of current practices, preferences, and barriers to the dissemination and uptake of new statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine 35: 805–818.

Rezvan

P. H.

, Lee

K. J.

, and Simpson

J. A.

2015. The rise of multiple imputation: A review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 15: 30.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

, and Rubin

D. B.

1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 41–55.

Royston

2004. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal 4: 227–241.

10.

Rubin

D. B.

1978. Multiple imputations in sample surveys: A phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse. In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 20–34.

11.

Rubin

D. B.

1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.

12.

van Buuren

, and Oudshoorn

C. G. M.

2000. Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations: MICE V1.0 User's Manual. Leiden, The Netherlands: Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research.