In this article, I introduce the itsa command, which performs interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. In an interrupted time-series analysis, an outcome variable is observed over multiple, equally spaced time periods before and after the introduction of an intervention that is expected to interrupt its level or trend. The itsa command estimates the effect of an intervention on an outcome variable either for a single treatment group or when compared with one or more control groups. Additionally, its options allow the user to control for autocorrelated disturbances and to estimate treatment effects over multiple periods.
AbadieA., DiamondA., and HainmuellerJ.2010. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association105: 493–505.
2.
AbadieA., DiamondA., and HainmuellerJ.2014. synth: Stata module to implement synthetic control methods for comparative case studies. Statistical Software Components S457334, Department of Economics, Boston College.https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457334.html.
3.
BarlowD. H., HayesS. C., and NelsonR. O.1984. The Scientist Practitioner: Research and Accountability in Clinical and Educational Settings.New York: Pergamon Press.
4.
BaumC. F., and SchafferM. E.2013. actest: Stata module to perform Cumby–Huizinga general test for autocorrelation in time series. Statistical Software Components S457668, Department of Economics, Boston College. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457668.html.
5.
BiglanA., AryD., and WagenaarA. C.2000. The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science1: 31–49.
6.
BoxG. E. P., and JenkinsG. M.1976. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control.San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.
7.
BoxG. E. P., and TiaoG. C.1975. Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association70: 70–79.
8.
BriesacherB. A., SoumeraiS. B., ZhangF., TohS., AndradeS. E., WagnerJ. L., ShoaibiA., and GurwitzJ. H.2013. A critical review of methods to evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety22: 986–994.
9.
CampbellD. T., and StanleyJ. C.1966. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research.Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
CrosbieJ.1993. Interrupted time-series analysis with brief single-subject data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology61: 966–974.
12.
CumbyR. E., and HuizingaJ.1992. Testing the autocorrelation structure of disturbances in ordinary least squares and instrumental variables regressions. Econometrica60: 185–195.
13.
GillingsD., MakucD., and SiegelE.1981. Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: An example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care. American Journal of Public Health71: 38–46.
14.
GlassG. V., WillsonV. L., and GottmanJ. M.1975. Design and Analysis of Time-Series Experiments.Boulder, CO: Colorado Associated University Press.
15.
GottmanJ. M.1981. Time-series Analysis: A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists.New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HuitemaB. E., and McKeanJ. W.2000a. Design specification issues in time-series intervention models. Educational and Psychological Measurement60: 38–58.
17.
HuitemaB. E., and McKeanJ. W.2000b. A simple and powerful test for autocorrelated errors in OLS intervention models. Psychological Reports87: 3–20.
18.
ImbensG. W., and LemieuxT.2008. Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics142: 615–635.
19.
KutnerM. H., NachtsheimC. J., NeterJ., and LiW.2005. Applied Linear Statistical Models.New York: McGraw–Hill.
20.
LindenA., and AdamsJ. L.2011. Applying a propensity-score based weighting model to interrupted time series data: Improving causal inference in program evaluation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice17: 1231–1238.
21.
McDowallD., McClearyR., MeidingerE. E., and HayR. A.1980. Interrupted Time Series Analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
22.
McKnightS., McKeanJ. W., and HuitemaB. E.2000. A double bootstrap method to analyze linear models with autoregressive error terms. Psychological Methods5: 87–101.
23.
MullerA.2004. Florida's motorcycle helmet law repeal and fatality rates. American Journal of Public Health94: 556–558.
24.
OrzechowskiW., and WalkerR. C.2005. The Tax Burden on Tobacco. Historical Compilation, vol. 40. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski & Walker.
25.
RamsayC. R., MatoweL., GrilliR., GrimshawJ. M., and ThomasR. E.2003. Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: Lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care19: 613–623.
26.
RileyW. T., GlasgowR. E., EtheredgeL., and AbernethyA. P.2013. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: A call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clinical and Translational Medicine2: 1–6.
27.
ShadishW. R., CookT. D., and CampbellD. T.2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
SimontonD. K.1977b. Erratum to Simonton. Psychological Bulletin84: 1097.
30.
VelicerW. F., and HarropJ.1983. The reliability and accuracy of time series model identification. Evaluation Review7: 551–560.
31.
VelicerW. F., and McDonaldR. P.1991. Cross-sectional time series designs: A general transformation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research26: 247–254.
