We present methods for testing hypotheses and estimating confidence sets for structural parameters of economic models in the presence of instabilities and breaks of unknown form. These methods constructively explore information generated by changes in the data-generating process to improve the inference of parameters that remain stable over time. The proposed methods are suitable for models cast in the generalized method of moments framework, which makes their application wide. Moreover, they are robust to the presence of weak instruments. The genstest command in Stata implements these methods to conduct hypothesis tests and to estimate confidence sets.
AndersonT. W., and RubinH.1949. Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics20: 46–63.
2.
AndrewsD. W. K.1993. Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica61: 821–856.
3.
AngristJ. D., and KruegerA. B.1995. Split-sample instrumental variables estimates of the return to schooling. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics13: 225–235.
4.
CameronA. C., and TrivediP. K.2010. Microeconometrics Using Stata.Rev. ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
5.
CanerM.2007. Boundedly pivotal structural change tests in continuous updating GMM with strong, weak identification and completely unidentified cases. Journal of Econometrics137: 28–67.
6.
ChernozhukovV., and HansenC.2008. The reduced form: A simple approach to inference with weak instruments. Economics Letters100: 68–71.
7.
DavidsonR., and MacKinnonJ. G.2003. Econometric Theory and Methods.New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
ElliottG., and MüllerU. K.2006. Efficient tests for general persistent time variation in regression coefficients. Review of Economic Studies73: 907–940.
9.
HallA. R.2005. Generalized Method of Moments.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
HallA. R., and SenA.1999. Structural stability testing in models estimated by generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics17: 335–348.
11.
HansenL. P.1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica50: 1029–1054.
12.
KleibergenF., and MavroeidisS.2009. Weak instrument robust tests in GMM and the new Keynesian Phillips curve. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics27: 293–311.
13.
MagnussonL. M., and MavroeidisS.2010a. Identification using stability restrictions. Working Paper 1116, Department of Economics, Tulane University.http://ideas.repec.org/p/tul/wpaper/1116.html.
14.
MagnussonL. M., and MavroeidisS.2010b. Identification-robust minimum distance estimation of the new Keynesian Phillips curve. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking42: 465–481.
15.
MrozT. A.1987. The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women's hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica55: 765–799.
16.
NeweyW. K., and WestK. D.1994. Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Review of Economic Studies61: 631–653.
17.
PiehlA. M., CooperS. J., BragaA. A., and KennedyD. M.2003. Testing for structural breaks in the evaluation of programs. Review of Economics and Statistics85: 550–558.
18.
SbordoneA. M.2005. Do expected future marginal costs drive inflation dynamics?Journal of Monetary Economics52: 1183–1197.
19.
SowellF.1996. Optimal tests for parameter instability in the generalized method of moments framework. Econometrica64: 1085–1107.
20.
StataCorp.2009. Stata: Release 11.Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
21.
StockJ. H., and WatsonM. W.1996. Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics14: 11–30.
22.
StockJ. H., and WrightJ. H.2000. GMM with weak identification. Econometrica68: 1055–1096.
23.
StockJ. H., WrightJ. H., and YogoM.2002. A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics20: 518–529.
