A new Stata command, simsum, analyzes data from simulation studies. The data may comprise point estimates and standard errors from several analysis methods, possibly resulting from several different simulation settings. simsum can report bias, coverage, power, empirical standard error, relative precision, average model-based standard error, and the relative error of the standard error. Monte Carlo errors are available for all of these estimated quantities.
BurtonA., AltmanD. G., RoystonP., and HolderR. L.2006. The design of simulation studies in medical statistics. Statistics in Medicine25: 4279–4292.
2.
DoornikJ. A., and HendryD. F.2009. Interactive Monte Carlo Experimentation in Econometrics Using PcNaive 5.London: Timberlake Consultants Press.
3.
KoehlerE., BrownE., and HaneuseS. J.-P. A.2009. On the assessment of Monte Carlo error in simulation-based statistical analyses. American Statistician63: 155–162.
4.
LittleR. J. A., and RubinD. B.2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5.
RoystonP.2004. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal4: 227–241.
6.
RoystonP.2009. Multiple imputation of missing values: Further update of ice, with an emphasis on categorical variables. Stata Journal9: 466–477.
7.
van BuurenS., BoshuizenH. C., and KnookD. L.1999. Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine18: 681–694.
8.
WhiteH.1982. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica50: 1–25.
9.
WhiteI. R., and RoystonP.2009. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Statistics in Medicine28: 1982–1998.
