This article describes updates of the meta-analysis command metan and options that have been added since the command's original publication (Bradburn, Deeks, and Altman, metan – an alternative meta-analysis command, Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 8, pp. 86–100). These include version 9 graphics with flexible display options, the ability to meta-analyze precalculated effect estimates, and the ability to analyze subgroups by using the by() option. Changes to the output, saved variables, and saved results are also described.
BradburnM. J., DeeksJ. J., and AltmanD. G.1998. sbe24: metan – an alternative meta-analysis command. Stata Technical Bulletin44: 4–15. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 8, pp. 86–100. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
2.
BreslowN. E., and DayN. E.1980. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Volume I-The Analysis of Case-Control Studies.Lyon, UK: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
3.
ColditzG. A., BrewerT. F., BerkeyC. S., WilsonM. E., BurdickE., FinebergH. V., and MostellerF.1994. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. Journal of the American Medical Association271: 698–702.
4.
DeeksJ. J., AltmanD. G., and BradburnM. J.2001. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context, ed. EggerM., SmithG. D., and AltmanD. G., 285–321.
5.
FineP. E.1995. Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity. Lancet346: 1339–1345.
6.
HarbordR. M., and HigginsJ. P. T.2008. Meta-regression in Stata. Stata Journal. Forthcoming.
7.
HigginsJ. P. T., and ThompsonS. G.2001. Presenting random effects meta-analyses: where are we going wrong? In 9th International Cochrane Colloquium.Lyon, France.
8.
HigginsJ. P. T.2004. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine23: 1663–1682.
9.
HigginsJ. P. T., ThompsonS. G., DeeksJ. J., and AltmanD. G.2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal327: 557–560.
10.
KirkwoodB. R., and SterneJ. A. C.2003. Essential Medical Statistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
11.
LunnD. J., ThomasA., BestN., and SpiegelhalterD.2000. WinBUGS – A Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure and extensibility. Statistics and Computing10: 325–337.
12.
PooleC., and GreenlandS.1999. Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative. American Journal of Epidemiology150: 469–475.
13.
ReisI., HirjiK. F., and AfifiA.1999. Exact and asymptotic tests for homogeneity in several 2 x 2 tables. Statistics in Medicine18: 893–906.
14.
SharpS., and SterneJ.1997. sbe16: Meta-analysis. Stata Technical Bulletin38: 9–14. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 7, pp. 100–106. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
15.
SterneJ. A. C., GavaghanD., and EggerM.2000. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology53: 1119–1129.
16.
SweetingM. J., SuttonA. J., and LambertP. C.2004. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of rare events. Statistics in Medicine23: 1351–1375.
17.
WarnD. E., ThompsonS. G., and SpiegelhalterD. J.2002. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Statistics in Medicine21: 1601–1623.
