This study draws on panel data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey (N = 1,128) to examine whether and how family and friends living close-by are associated with individuals’ interneighborhood residential mobility. Additional analyses tap into why individuals’ proportion of nearby kin and friends are linked to their mobility. The results suggest that individuals’ perceptions of their neighborhood are patterned by whether or not they have family—and to a lesser extent friends—who live locally. The absence of nearby family is associated with leaving the neighborhood, but the direct effects do not hold for nearby friends. However, the role of friends does become important in the absence of family ties. The results also indicate that having nearby friends moderates the relationship between neighborhood satisfaction and moving away.
AntonioAnthony Lising. 2004. “The Influence of Friendship Groups on Intellectual Self Confidence and Educational Aspirations in College.” Journal of Higher Education75:446–71.
2.
BelotMichèleErmischJohn. 2009. “Friendship Ties and Geographical Mobility: Evidence from Great Britain.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A172:427–42.
3.
BreenRichardKarlsonKristian BerntHolmAnders. 2013. “Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Logit and Probit Models.” Sociological Methods & Research42:164–91. doi:10.1177/0049124113494572.
4.
BucknerJohn C.1988. “The Development of an Instrument to Measure Neighborhood Cohesion.” American Journal of Community Psychology16:771–91.
5.
ConnerlyCharles E.1986. “The Impact of Neighborhood Social Relations on Prospective Mobility.” Social Science Quarterly67:186–94.
6.
CroweJessica. 2010. “Community Attachment and Satisfaction: The Role of a Community’s Social Network Structure.” Journal of Community Psychology38:622–44.
7.
DawkinsCasey J.2006. “Are Social Networks the Ties That Bind Families to Neighborhoods?” Housing Studies21:867–81. doi:10.1080/02673030600917776.
8.
De GiorgiGiacomoPellizzariMicheleRedaelliSilvia. 2007. Be as Careful of the Books You Read as of the Company You Keep: Evidence on Peer Effects in Educational Choices. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
9.
FischerClaude S.1982. To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
FischerPeter A.MalmbergGunnar. 2001. “Settled People Don’t Move: On Life Course and (Im-)mobility in Sweden.” International Journal of Population Geography7:357–71.
11.
FitzBrittany M.LyonLarryDriskellRobyn. 2015. “Why People Like Where They Live: Individual- and Community-Level Contributors to Community Satisfaction.” Social Indicators Research126:1209–24.
12.
GeistClaudiaMcManusPatricia A.2008. “Geographical Mobility over the Life Course: Motivations and Implications.” Population, Space and Place14:283–303.
13.
GillespieBrian JosephLeverJanetFrederickDavidRoyceTracy. 2015. “Close Adult Friendships, Gender, and the Life Cycle.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships32:709–36. doi:10.1177/0265407514546977.
14.
GillespieBrian JosephMulderClara H.2020. “Nonresident Family as a Motive for Migration.” Demographic Research42:399–410. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.13.
15.
GillespieBrian JosephMulderClara H.von ReichertChristiane. 2021. “The Role of Family and Friends in Return Migration and Its Labor Market Outcomes.” Population Research and Policy Review. Published electronically April 1 2021. doi:10.1007/s11113-021-09650-x.
16.
GranovetterMark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
17.
HedmanLina. 2013. “Moving Near Family? The Influence of Extended Family on Neighbourhood Choice in an Intra-Urban Context.” Population, Space and Place19:32–45.
18.
JonesAntwanDantzlerPrentiss. 2021. “Neighbourhood Perceptions and Residential Mobility.” Urban Studies58:1792–810. doi:10.1177/0042098020916440.
19.
KasardaJohn D.JanowitzMorris. 1974. “Community Attachment in Mass Society.” American Sociological Review39:328–39.
20.
KohlerUlrichKarlsonKristian BerntHolmAnders. 2011. “Comparing Coefficients of Nested Nonlinear Probability Models.” The Stata Journal11:420–38.
21.
LandaleNancy S.GuestAvery M.1985. “Constraints, Satisfaction and Residential Mobility: Speare’s Model Reconsidered.” Demography22:199–222.
22.
LoganJohn R.SpitzeGlenna D.1994. “Family Neighbors.” American Journal of Sociology100:453–76.
23.
MarmarosaDavidSacerdoteBruce. 2002. “Peer and Social Networks in Job Search.” European Economic Review46:870–79.
24.
MasseyDouglas S.EspinosaKristin E.1997. “What’s Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology4:939–99.
25.
MeschGustavo S.ManorOrit. 1997. “Social Ties, Environmental Perception, and Local Attachment.” Environment and Behavior30(4):504–19.
26.
MulderClara H.2018. “Putting Family Centre-Stage: Ties to Non-Resident Family, Internal Migration, and Immobility.” Demographic Research39:1151–80.
27.
MulderClara H.CookeThomas J.2009. “Family Ties and Residential Locations.” Population, Space and Place15:299–304.
28.
MulderClara H.GillespieBrian Joseph. 2021. “De Magneetwerking Van Familie in Verhuizingen over Lange Afstand [The Magnetizing Effect of the Family for Long-Distance Moves].” Demos: Bulletin on Population & Society37:8.
29.
MulderClara H.LundholmEmmaMalmbergGunnar. 2020. “Young Adults’ Return Migration from Large Cities in Sweden: The Role of Siblings and Parents.” Population, Space and Place26:e2354. doi:10.1002/psp.2354.
30.
MyersGeorge C.McGinnisRobertMasnickGeorge. 1967. “The Duration of Residence Approach to Dynamic Stochastic Model of Internal Migration: A Test of the Axiom of Cumulative Inertia.” Eugenics Quarterly14:121–26.
31.
MyersScott M.2000. “The Impact of Religious Involvement on Migration.” Social Forces79:755–83.
32.
NiedomyslThomas. 2011. “How Migration Motives Change over Migration Distance: Evidence on Variation across Socio-Economic and Demographic Groups.” Regional Studies45:843–55.
33.
OhJoong-Hwan. 2003. “Social Bonds and the Migration Intentions of Elderly Urban Residents: The Mediating Effect of Residential Satisfaction.” Population Research and Policy Review22:127–46.
34.
PetersonChristine E.PebleyAnne R.SastryNarayan. 2007. The Los Angeles Neighborhood Services and Characteristics Database: Codebook. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
35.
PetersonChristine E.PebleyAnne R.SastryNarayanYuhasKarenAnnBonnie Ghosh-DastidarHaasC.GregoryJesseBitlerMarianne P.2011. Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey, Wave 2: Users’ Guide and Codebook. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
36.
RosenSherwin. 1986. “The Theory of Equalizing Differences.” Pp. 641–92 in Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, edited by AshenfelterO.LayardP.New York: Elsevier.
37.
RossiAliceRossiPeter H.1990. Of Human Bonding: Parent Child Relations across the Life Course. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
38.
RossiPeter H.1980. Why Families Move. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
39.
SampsonRobert J.MorenoffJeffrey D.EarlsFelton. 1999. “Beyond Social Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children.” American Sociological Review64:633–60.
40.
SastryNarayanGhosh-DastidarBonnieAdamsJohnPebleyAnne R.2006. “The Design of a Multilevel Survey of Children, Families, and Communities: The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey.” Social Science Research35:1000–24. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.08.002.
41.
SharpGregoryWarnerCody. 2018. “Neighborhood Structure, Community Social Organization, and Residential Mobility.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World4:1–14. doi:10.1177/2378023118797861.
42.
SpeareAldenJr.1974. “Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility.” Demography11:173–88.
43.
SpringAmyAckertElizabethCrowderKyleSouthScott J.2017. “Influence of Proximity to Kin on Residential Mobility and Destination Choice: Examining Local Movers in Metropolitan Areas.” Demography54:1277–304. doi:10.1007/s13524-017-0587-x.
44.
ThomasMichaelGillespieBrian JosephLomaxNik. 2019. “Variations in Migration Motives over Distance.” Demographic Research40:1097–110. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.38.
45.
WellmanBarryWortleyScot. 1990. “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support.” American Journal of Sociology93:558–88.
46.
WolpertJulian. 1965. “Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate.” Papers in Regional Science15:159–69.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
