MortonD.
B. (2000). A systematic
approach for establishing humane endpoints. In Institute for
Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal: Humane Endpoints for Animals Used in
Biomedical Research and Testing, 41(2). Available at: http://dels-old.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarjournal/41_2/Systematic.shtml. Accessed online 2012.
5.
MortonD.
B. (2008). Sheet
A-3. In Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ed.),
Recognition and alleviation of distress in laboratory animals.Washington, DC: The National Academies
Press. Available at: www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11931&page=109. Accessed online 2012.
MortonD.
B. & HauJ. (2011). Welfare assessment and humane
endpoints. In HauJ. & SchapiroS.
J. (eds.), Handbook of laboratory animal
science (3rd ed.), Volume 1. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press.
8.
National Academy of Sciences. (2011). Committee on Animal Models for Assessing Countermeasures to
Bioterrorism Agents.Washington, DC: The National Academies
Press. Available at: www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13233. Accessed online 2012.
9.
RichmondJ.
Y. (2000). Criteria for
humane endpoints. ILAR Journal, 41(2).
10.
RussellW. M.
S. & BurchR.
L. (1959). The principles of
humane experimental technique.London: Methuen. Universities Federation
for Animal Welfare (UFAW) Potters Bar, Herts, UK:
England. Special edition (1992).
11.
The National Centre for the Replacement,
Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs). (2012). Available at: www.nc3rs.org.uk/category.asp?catID=21. Accessed online 2012.
van der MeerM., RollsA., BaumansV. & OliverB. & van
ZutphenL. F. M. (2001). Use of score sheets for welfare assessment of
transgenic mice. Laboratory Animals Ltd., 35, 379–389. Available at: http://la.rsmjournals.com/content/35/4/379.full.pdf. Accessed online 2012.