Personal computer boxes, keyboards, and monitors were placed in routine decontamination
chambers and decontaminated with gaseous formaldehyde. Assessment of decontamination
effectiveness by biological indicator data demonstrated that successful decontamination of
internal spaces was achieved without prior dismantling of the computer components.
References
1.
AbrahamG., Le Blanc SmithP.
M., & NguyenS. (1997). The effectiveness of gaseous formaldehyde
decontamination assessed by biological monitoring. Journal of
the American Biological Safety Association, 2(1), 30–38.
2.
AcklandN. R., HintonM. R., & DenmeadeK.
R. (1980). Controlled
formaldehyde fumigation system. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 39(3), 480–487.
3.
CheneyJ.
E., & CollinsC.
H. (1995). Formaldehyde
disinfection in laboratories: Limitations and hazards. British
Journal of Biomedical Science, 52(3), 195–201.
4.
HoffmanR.
K., & SpinerD.
R. (1970). Effect of
relative humidity on the penetrability and sporicidal activity of
formaldehyde. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 20(4), 616–619.
5.
LachV. H. (1990). A study of conventional formaldehyde fumigation
methods. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 68(5), 471–477.
6.
PhillipsC.
R. (1977). Gaseous
sterilization. In BlockS.
S. (Ed.), Disinfection, sterilization, and
preservation (2nd ed.), pp. 592–610. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
7.
SongerJ. R., BraymenD. T., MathisR. G., & MonroeJ.
W. (1972). The practical
use of formaldehyde vapor for disinfection. Health Laboratory
Science, 9(1), 46–55.
8.
SpicherG., & BorchersU. (1983). Dependency of the microbiological test results of a
formaldehyde gas sterilization procedure on the shape of the objects to be sterilized.
Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie Mikrobiologie und Hygiene. 1. Abt. Originale B, Hygiene, 177(5), 419–435.
9.
TaylorL. A., BarbeitoM., & GremillionG. (1969). Paraformaldehyde for surface sterilization and
detoxification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 17(4), 614–618.