The contribution of GJB4 and GJC3 gene variants to hearing impairment in Africa has not yet been studied. Here, we investigated the contribution of these genes to autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment in Ghanaian children. Hearing-impaired children from 141 simplex and 59 multiplex families were enrolled from 11 schools for the deaf in Ghana. The coding regions of GJB4 and GJC3 were amplified, sequenced, and analyzed for the study participants previously found to be negative for GJB2 and GJB6 variants. Seven GJB4 and one GJC3 variants were identified. One out of the seven GJB4 variants was classified as likely pathogenic, while the others were either benign or synonymous. The likely pathogenic variant (p.Asn119Thr/rs190460237) was predicted to be likely associated with hearing impairment. We modeled the wild-type and mutant proteins of this variant (p.Asn119Thr) to evaluate the effect of the mutation on protein structure and ligand-binding properties. The mutant and not the wild type had the potential to bind N-Ethyl-5ʹ-Carboxamido Adenosine (DB03719) which was due to a slight structural change that was observed. No clinically relevant variant was identified in the GJC3 gene. We report for the first time a likely pathogenic GJB4 variant that may be associated with non-syndromic hearing impairment in Ghana; the finding will add to the body of evidence of the contribution of GJB4 to hearing impairment cases around the world.
Impact statement
Although connexins are known to be the major genetic factors associated with HI, only a few studies have investigated GJB4 and GJC3 variants among hearing-impaired patients. This study is the first to report GJB4 and GJC3 variants from an African HI cohort. We have demonstrated that GJB4 and GJC3 genes may not contribute significantly to HI in Ghana, hence these genes should not be considered for routine clinical screening in Ghana. However, it is important to study a larger population to determine the association of GJB4 and GJC3 variants with HI.
MurrayEMcCabePHeardRBallardKJ.Differential diagnosis of children with suspected childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res2015;
58:43–60
2.
VosTBarberRMBellBBertozzi-VillaABiryukovSBolligerICharlsonFDavisADegenhardtLDickerD.Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet2015;
386:743–800
3.
WHO.Deafness and hearing loss.
Fact sheets:
World Health Organization, 2019
4.
OlusanyaBONeumannKJSaundersJE.The global burden of disabling hearing impairment: a call to action. Bull World Health Organ2014;
92:367–73
5.
WonkamANoubiapJJNDjomouFFieggenKNjockRToureGB.Aetiology of childhood hearing loss in Cameroon (Sub-Saharan Africa). Eur J Med Genet2013;
56:20–5
SheffieldAMSmithRJ.The epidemiology of deafness. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med2019;
9:1–16
8.
ZhouYLiCLiMZhaoZTianSXiaHLiuPHanYRenRChenJ.Mutation analysis of common deafness genes among 1,201 patients with non‐syndromic hearing loss in Shanxi province. Mol Genet Genomic Med2019;
7:1–8
9.
WuXGaoXHanPZhouY.Identification of causative variants in patients with non-syndromic hearing loss in the Minnan region, China by targeted next-generation sequencing. Acta Oto laryngol2019;
139:243–50
10.
DiStefanoMTHemphillSEOzaAMSiegertRKGrantARHughesMYCushmanBJAzaiezHBoothKTChapinA.ClinGen expert clinical validity curation of 164 hearing loss gene–disease pairs. Genet Med2019;
21:2239–47
11.
ChakchoukIZhangDZhangZFrancioliLCSantos-CortezRLPSchrauwenILealSM.Disparities in discovery of pathogenic variants for autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment by ancestry. Eur J Hum Genet2019;
27:1456–65
12.
ChanDKChangKW.GJB2‐associated hearing loss: systematic review of worldwide prevalence, genotype, and auditory phenotype. Laryngoscope2014;
124:E34–53
13.
del CastilloIMoreno-PelayoMADel CastilloFJBrownsteinZMarlinSAdinaQCockburnDJPandyaASiemeringKRChamberlinGP.Prevalence and evolutionary origins of the del (GJB6-D13S1830) mutation in the DFNB1 locus in hearing-impaired subjects: a multicenter study. Am J Hum Genet2003;
73:1452–8
14.
del CastilloIVillamarMMoreno-PelayoMAdel CastilloFJAlvarezATelleriaDMenendezIMorenoF.A deletion involving the connexin 30 gene in nonsyndromic hearing impairment. N Engl J Med2002;
346:243–9
15.
SabagADDaganOAvrahamKB.Connexins in hearing loss: a comprehensive overview. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol2005;
16:101–16
16.
KelsellDPDiW-LHousemanMJ.Connexin mutations in skin disease and hearing loss. Am J Hum Genet2001;
68:559–68
LairdDWNausCCLampePD.SnapShot: connexins and disease. Cell2017;
170:1260
19.
Karami-EshkaftakiRAhmadinejadFAghaeiSMoghimHHashemzadeh-ChaleshtoriMJamiM-S.Hearing loss: a review on molecular genetics and epidemiologic aspects. Int J Epidemiol Res2017;
4:166–72
20.
KooshavarDTabatabaiefarMAFarrokhiEAbolhasaniMNoori-DaloiiMRHashemzadeh-ChaleshtoriM.Digenic inheritance in autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss cases carrying GJB2 heterozygote mutations: assessment of GJB4, GJA1, and GJC3. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol2013;
77:189–93
21.
LalehMANaseriMZonouziAAPZonouziAPMasoudiMAhangariNShamsLNejatizadehA.Diverse pattern of gap junction beta-2 and gap junction beta-4 genes mutations and lack of contribution of DFNB21, DFNB24, DFNB29, and DFNB42 loci in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss patients in Hormozgan, Iran. J Res Med Sci2017;
22:1–11
22.
YangJJWangWHLinYCWengHHYangJTHwangCFWuCMLiSY.Prospective variants screening of connexin genes in children with hearing impairment: genotype/phenotype correlation. Hum Genet2010;
128:303–13
23.
RamchanderPVPandaKCPandaAK.Mutations in the connexin 29 gene are not a major cause of nonsyndromic hearing impairment in India. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers2010;
14:539–41
24.
SmithJRHaymanGTWangS-JLaulederkindSJHoffmanMJKaldunskiMLTutajMThotaJNalaboluHSEllankiSL.The year of the rat: the rat genome database at 20: a multi-species knowledgebase and analysis platform. Nucleic Acids Res2020;
48:D731–D42
25.
LandrumMJLeeJMBensonMBrownGRChaoCChitipirallaSGuBHartJHoffmanDJangW.ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res2018;
46:D1062–D67
26.
WangW-HYangJ-JLinY-CYangJ-TLiS-Y.Novel expression patterns of connexin 30.3 in adult rat cochlea. Hear Res2010;
265:77–82
27.
AdadeySMManyisaNMnikaKde KockCNembawareVQuayeOAmedofuGKAwandareGAWonkamA.GJB2 and GJB6 mutations in non-syndromic childhood hearing impairment in Ghana. Front Genet2019;
10:1–10
28.
BrobbyGWMuller-MyhsokBHorstmannRD.Connexin 26 R143W mutation associated with recessive nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness in Africa. N Engl J Med1998;
338:548–50
29.
HamelmannCAmedofuGKAlbrechtKMuntauBGelhausABrobbyGWHorstmannRD.Pattern of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations causing sensorineural hearing impairment in Ghana. Hum Mutat2001;
18:84–5
30.
AdadeySMTingangWETwumasiAEQuansahDAsante-PokuAQuayeOAmedofuGKAwandareGAWonkamA.Enhancing Genetic medicine: rapid and cost-effective molecular diagnosis for a GJB2 founder mutation for hearing impairment in Ghana. Genes2020;
11:1–11
31.
WonkamABoschJNoubiapJJNLebekoKMakubaloNDandaraC.No evidence for clinical utility in investigating the connexin genes GJB2, GJB6 and GJA1 in non-syndromic hearing loss in black Africans. S Afr Med J2015;
105:23–6
32.
Tingang WonkamEChimusaENoubiapJJAdadeySM, JFFWonkamA.GJB2 and GJB6 mutations in hereditary recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment in Cameroon. Genes2019;
10:844
33.
Bosch J, Lebeko K, Nziale JJ, Dandara C, Makubalo N, Wonkam A. OMICS 2014;18(7):481–5.
34.
OkonechnikovKGFursovM.The_UGENE_team. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics2012;
28:1166–7
35.
KopanosCTsiolkasVKourisAChappleCEAlbarca AguileraMMeyerRMassourasA.VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics2019;
35:1978–80
36.
TavtigianSVDeffenbaughAMYinLJudkinsTSchollTSamollowPBde SilvaDZharkikhAThomasA.Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral. J Med Genet2006;
43:295–305
37.
MatheEOlivierMKatoSIshiokaCHainautPTavtigianSV.Computational approaches for predicting the biological effect of p53 missense mutations: a comparison of three sequence analysis based methods. Nucleic Acids Res2006;
34:1317–25
38.
ShihabHAGoughJCooperDNStensonPDBarkerGLEdwardsKJDayINGauntTR.Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden markov models. Hum Mutat2013;
34:57–65
39.
ShihabHAGoughJCooperDNDayINGauntTR.Predicting the functional consequences of cancer-associated amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics2013;
29:1504–10
40.
ShihabHAGoughJMortMCooperDNDayINGauntTR.Ranking non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms based on disease concepts. Hum Genom2014;
8:1–6
41.
RevaBAntipinYSanderC.Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res2011;
39:e118–e18
42.
RevaBAntipinYSanderC.Determinants of protein function revealed by combinatorial entropy optimization. Genome Biol2007;
8:R232.1–R32.15
43.
SchwarzJMCooperDNSchuelkeMSeelowD.MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods2014;
11:361–2
44.
ChoiYSimsGEMurphySMillerJRChanAP.Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One2012;
7:1–13
45.
ChoiY.A fast computation of pairwise sequence alignment scores between a protein and a set of single-locus variants of another protein. Proc ACM Conf Bioinform Comput Biol Biomed2012:414–7
46.
ChoiYChanAP.PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics2015;
31:2745–7
47.
AdzhubeiIASchmidtSPeshkinLRamenskyVEGerasimovaABorkPKondrashovASSunyaevSR.A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.Nat Methods2010;
7:248–9
48.
KumarPHenikoffSNgPC.Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc2009;
4:1073–81
NgPCHenikoffS.Accounting for human polymorphisms predicted to affect protein function. Genome Res2002;
12:436–46
51.
NgPCHenikoffS.SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res2003;
31:3812–4
52.
Ionita-LazaIMcCallumKXuBBuxbaumJD.A spectral approach integrating functional genomic annotations for coding and noncoding variants. Nat Genet2016;
48:214–20
53.
SundaramLGaoHPadigepatiSRMcRaeJFLiYKosmickiJAFritzilasNHakenbergJDuttaAShonJ.Predicting the clinical impact of human mutation with deep neural networks. Nat Genet2018;
50:1161–70
54.
LiQWangK.InterVar: clinical interpretation of genetic variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP guidelines. Am J Hum Genet2017;
100:267–80
55.
DeLanoWL.Pymol: an open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newslett Protein Crystallograph2002;
40:82–92
Shen MySaliA.Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci2006;
15:2507–24
58.
ShinW-HLeeGRHeoLLeeHSeokC.Prediction of protein structure and interaction by GALAXY protein modeling programs. Bio Design2014;
2:1–11
59.
KoJParkHHeoLSeokC.GalaxyWEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement. Nucleic Acids Res2012;
40:W294–W97
60.
MahmoodKJungC-hPhilipGGeorgesonPChungJPopeBJParkDJ.Variant effect prediction tools assessed using independent, functional assay-based datasets: implications for discovery and diagnostics. Hum Genom2017;
11:10
61.
LeongIUStuckeyALaiDSkinnerJRLoveDR.Assessment of the predictive accuracy of five in silico prediction tools, alone or in combination, and two metaservers to classify long QT syndrome gene mutations. BMC Med Genet2015;
16:34
62.
WingardJCZhaoH-B.Cellular and deafness mechanisms underlying connexin mutation-induced hearing loss–a common hereditary deafness. Front Cell Neurosci2015;
9:202
63.
WongSHWangWHChenPHLiSYYangJJ.Functional analysis of a nonsyndromic hearing loss-associated mutation in the transmembrane II domain of the GJC3 gene. Int J Med Sci2017;
14:246–56
64.
Lopez-BigasNMelchiondaSGaspariniPBorraganAArbonesMLEstivillX.A common frameshift mutation and other variants in GJB4 (connexin 30.3): analysis of hearing impairment families. Hum Mutat2002;
19:458
EibergerJKibschullMStrenzkeNSchoberABüssowHWessigCDjahedSReucherHKochDALautermannJ.Expression pattern and functional characterization of connexin29 in transgenic mice. Glia2006;
53:601–11
Zheng-FischhöferQSchnichelsMDereEStrotmannJLoscherNMcCullochFKretzMDegenJReucherHNagyJI.Characterization of connexin30. 3-deficient mice suggests a possible role of connexin30. 3 in olfaction. Eur J Cell Biol2007;
86:683–700
69.
AlexandrinoFde OliveiraCAMagalhaesRFFlorenceMEde SouzaEMSartoratoEL.Connexin mutations in Brazilian patients with skin disorders with or without hearing loss. Am J Med Genet A2009;
149a:681–4
70.
CommonJEO’TooleEALeighIMThomasAGriffithsWAVenningVGrabczynskaSPerišZKanskyAKelsellDP.Clinical and genetic heterogeneity of erythrokeratoderma variabilis. J Invest Dermatol2005;
125:920–7
71.
Pérez-PalmaEMayPIqbalSNiestrojL-MDuJHeyneHOCastrillonJAO’Donnell-LuriaANürnbergPPalotieA.Identification of pathogenic variant enriched regions across genes and gene families. Genome Res2020;
30:62–71
72.
KnoxCLawVJewisonTLiuPLySFrolkisAPonABancoKMakCNeveuV.DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for ‘omics’ research on drugs. Nucleic Acids Res2010;
39:D1035–D41
73.
LebonGWarneTEdwardsPCBennettKLangmeadCJLeslieAGTateCG.Agonist-bound adenosine a 2A receptor structures reveal common features of GPCR activation. Nature2011;
474:521–5
74.
HuangSALieJD.Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors in the management of erectile dysfunction. Pharm Ther2013;
38:414–9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
