Microphysiologic systems (MPS), including new organ-on-a-chip technologies, recapitulate tissue microenvironments by employing specially designed tissue or cell culturing techniques and microfluidic flow. Such systems are designed to incorporate physiologic factors that conventional 2D or even 3D systems cannot, such as the multicellular dynamics of a tissue–tissue interface or physical forces like fluid sheer stress. The female reproductive system is a series of interconnected organs that are necessary to produce eggs, support embryo development and female health, and impact the functioning of non-reproductive tissues throughout the body. Despite its importance, the human reproductive tract has received less attention than other organ systems, such as the liver and kidney, in terms of modeling with MPS. In this review, we discuss current gaps in the field and areas for technological advancement through the application of MPS. We explore current MPS research in female reproductive biology, including fertilization, pregnancy, and female reproductive tract diseases, with a focus on their clinical applications.
Impact statement
This review discusses existing microphysiologic systems technology that may be applied to study of the female reproductive tract, and those currently in development to specifically investigate gametes, fertilization, embryo development, pregnancy, and diseases of the female reproductive tract. We focus on the clinical applicability of these new technologies in fields such as assisted reproductive technologies, drug testing, disease diagnostics, and personalized medicine.
EddieSLKimJJWoodruffTKBurdetteJE. Microphysiological modeling of the reproductive tract: a fertile endeavor. Exp Biol Med (Maywood)2014; 239: 1192–202.
2.
MathurALoskillPShaoKHuebschNHongSMarcusSGMarksNMandegarMConklinBRLeeLPHealyKE. Human iPSC-based cardiac microphysiological system for drug screening applications. Sci Rep2015; 5: 8883–8883.
3.
LiWXLiangGTYanWZhangQWangWZhouXMLiuDY. Uterus on a microfluidic chip. Chin J Anal Chem2013; 41: 467–72.
4.
MillerPGShulerML. Design and demonstration of a pumpless 14 compartment microphysiological system. Biotechnol Bioeng2016; 113: 2213–27.
5.
OleagaCBernabiniCSmithASSrinivasanBJacksonMMcLambWPlattVBridgesRCaiYSanthanamNBerryBNajjarSAkandaNGuoXMartinCEkmanGEschMBLangerJOuedraogoGCotovioJBretonLShulerMLHickmanJJ. Multi-organ toxicity demonstration in a functional human in vitro system composed of four organs. Sci Rep2016; 6: 20030–20030.
6.
LoskillPMarcusSGMathurAReeseWMHealyKE. muOrgano: a lego(R)-like plug & play system for modular multi-organ-chips. PLoS One2015; 10: e0139587–e0139587.
7.
MaschmeyerILorenzAKSchimekKHasenbergTRammeAPHubnerJLindnerMDrewellCBauerSThomasASamboNSSonntagFLausterRMarxU. A four-organ-chip for interconnected long-term co-culture of human intestine, liver, skin and kidney equivalents. Lab Chip2015; 15: 2688–99.
8.
LimaEASniderRMReisererRSMcKenzieJRKimmelDWEklundSEWikswoJPCliffelDE. Multichamber multipotentiostat system for cellular microphysiometry. Sens Actuators B Chem2014; 204: 536–43.
9.
PaguiriganALPuccinelliJPSuXBeebeDJ. Expanding the available assays: adapting and validating in-cell westerns in microfluidic devices for cell-based assays. Assay Drug Dev Technol2010; 8: 591–601.
10.
LiXLiuX. A microfluidic paper-based origami nanobiosensor for label-free, ultrasensitive immunoassays. Adv Healthc Mater2016; 5: 1326–35.
11.
SanjaySTDouMSunJLiX. A paper/polymer hybrid microfluidic microplate for rapid quantitative detection of multiple disease biomarkers. Sci Rep2016; 6: 30474–30474.
12.
MarascoCCEndersJRSealeKTMcLeanJAWikswoJP. Real-time cellular exometabolome analysis with a microfluidic-mass spectrometry platform. PLoS One2015; 10: e0117685–e0117685.
13.
ZhuJXuYRashediASPavoneMEKimJJWoodruffTKBurdetteJE. Human fallopian tube epithelium co-culture with murine ovarian follicles reveals crosstalk in the reproductive cycle. Mol Hum Reprod2016; 22: 756–67.
14.
KimSBKooKIBaeHDokmeciMRHamiltonGABahinskiAKimSMIngberDEKhademhosseiniA. A mini-microscope for in situ monitoring of cells. Lab Chip2012; 12: 3976–82.
15.
ZhangYSRibasJNadhmanAAlemanJSelimovicSLesher-PerezSCWangTManoharanVShinSRDamilanoAAnnabiNDokmeciMRTakayamaSKhademhosseiniA. A cost-effective fluorescence mini-microscope for biomedical applications. Lab Chip2015; 15: 3661–9.
16.
MeseguerMKruhneULaursenS. Full in vitro fertilization laboratory mechanization: toward robotic assisted reproduction?Fertil Steril2012; 97: 1277–86.
17.
AkagiJZhuFHallCJCrosierKECrosierPSWlodkowicD. Integrated chip-based physiometer for automated fish embryo toxicity biotests in pharmaceutical screening and ecotoxicology. Cytometry A2014; 85: 537–47.
18.
ZhangYSBusignaniFRibasJAlemanJRodriguesTNShaeghSAMassaSBaj RossiCTaurinoIShinSRCalzoneGAmaratungaGMChambersDLJabariSNiuYManoharanVDokmeciMRCarraraSDemarchiDKhademhosseiniA. Google glass-directed monitoring and control of microfluidic biosensors and actuators. Sci Rep2016; 6: 22237–22237.
19.
SuarezSSWuM. Microfluidic devices for the study of sperm migration. Mol Hum Reprod.Epub ahead of print 8 July. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaw039.
20.
LiZLiuWQiuTXieLChenWLiuRLuYMitchelsonKWangJQiaoJChengJ. The construction of an interfacial valve-based microfluidic chip for thermotaxis evaluation of human sperm. Biomicrofluidics2014; 8: 024102–024102.
21.
El-SherryTMElsayedMAbdelhafezHKAbdelgawadM. Characterization of rheotaxis of bull sperm using microfluidics. Integr Biol (Camb)2014; 6: 1111–21.
22.
TungCKHuLFioreAGArdonFHickmanDGGilbertROSuarezSSWuM. Microgrooves and fluid flows provide preferential passageways for sperm over pathogen Tritrichomonas foetus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2015; 112: 5431–6.
23.
SakkasD. Novel technologies for selecting the best sperm for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril2013; 99: 1023–9.
24.
ZhangYXiaoRRYinTZouWTangYDingJYangJ. Generation of gradients on a microfluidic device: toward a high-throughput investigation of spermatozoa chemotaxis. PLoS One2015; 10: e0142555–e0142555.
25.
JakabASakkasDDelpianoECayliSKovanciEWardDRevelliAHuszarG. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel selection method for sperm with normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertil Steril2005; 84: 1665–73.
26.
IvicAOnyeakaHGirlingABrewisIAOlaBHammadiehNPapaioannouSBarrattCL. Critical evaluation of methylcellulose as an alternative medium in sperm migration tests. Hum Reprod2002; 17: 143–9.
27.
AinsworthCNixonBAitkenRJ. Development of a novel electrophoretic system for the isolation of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod2005; 20: 2261–70.
28.
SadaniZWacogneBPieralliCRouxCGharbiT. Microsystems and microfluidic device for single oocyte transportation and trapping: toward the automation of in vitro fertilising. Sens Actuators A Phys2005; 121: 364–72.
29.
Sadeghzadeh OskoueiBPashaiaslMHeidariMHSalehiMVeladiHGhaderi PakdelFShahabiPNovinMG. Evaluation of mouse oocyte in vitro maturation developmental competency in dynamic culture systems by design and construction of a lab on a chip device and its comparison with conventional culture system. Cell J2016; 18: 205–13.
30.
WangWHKeefeDL. Spindle observation in living mammalian oocytes with the polarization microscope and its practical use. Cloning Stem Cells2002; 4: 269–76.
31.
ZeringueHCWheelerMBBeebeDJ. A microfluidic method for removal of the zona pellucida from mammalian embryos. Lab Chip2005; 5: 108–10.
32.
ZeringueHBeebeDWheelerM. Removal of cumulus from mammalian zygotes using microfluidic techniques. Biomed Microdevices2001; 3: 219–24.
33.
MatsuuraKUozumiTFuruichiTSugimotoIKodamaMFunahashiH. A microfluidic device to reduce treatment time of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril2013; 99: 400–7.
34.
LeungCLuZEsfandiariNCasperRFSunY. Automated sperm immobilization for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2011; 58: 935–42.
35.
LiuXSunY. Microfabricated glass devices for rapid single cell immobilization in mouse zygote microinjection. Biomed Microdevices2009; 11: 1169–74.
36.
ClarkSGHaubertKBeebeDJFergusonCEWheelerMB. Reduction of polyspermic penetration using biomimetic microfluidic technology during in vitro fertilization. Lab Chip2005; 5: 1229–32.
37.
MaRXieLHanCSuKQiuTWangLHuangGXingWQiaoJWangJChengJ. In vitro fertilization on a single-oocyte positioning system integrated with motile sperm selection and early embryo development. Anal Chem2011; 83: 2964–70.
38.
da RochaAMSmithGD. Culture systems: fluid dynamic embryo culture systems (microfluidics). Methods Mol Biol2012; 912: 355–65.
39.
HuangHYShenHHTienCHLiCJFanSKLiuCHHsuWSYaoDJ. Digital microfluidic dynamic culture of mammalian embryos on an electrowetting on dielectric (EWOD) chip. PLoS One2015; 10: e0124196–e0124196.
40.
HickmanDLBeebeDJRodriguez-ZasSLWheelerMB. Comparison of static and dynamic medium environments for culturing of pre-implantation mouse embryos. Comp Med2002; 52: 122–6.
41.
HeoYSCabreraLMBormannCLShahCTTakayamaSSmithGD. Dynamic microfunnel culture enhances mouse embryo development and pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod2010; 25: 613–22.
42.
HeoYSCabreraLMBormannCLSmithGDTakayamaS. Real time culture and analysis of embryo metabolism using a microfluidic device with deformation based actuation. Lab Chip2012; 12: 2240–6.
43.
UrbanskiJPJohnsonMTCraigDDPotterDLGardnerDKThorsenT. Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single preimplantation embryos. Anal Chem2008; 80: 6500–7.
44.
HuangSHHuangKSYuCHGongHY. Metabolic profile analysis of a single developing zebrafish embryo via monitoring of oxygen consumption rates within a microfluidic device. Biomicrofluidics2013; 7: 64107–64107.
45.
PyneDGLiuJAbdelgawadMSunY. Digital microfluidic processing of mammalian embryos for vitrification. PLoS One2014; 9: e108128–e108128.
46.
SteeleMWBregWRJr. Chromosome analysis of human amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet1966; 1: 383–5.
ShenFDuWKreutzJEFokAIsmagilovRF. Digital PCR on a slipchip. Lab Chip2010; 10: 2666–72.
49.
VanInsbergheMHeyriesKAHansenCL. Should genetic testing go digital?Expert Rev Mol Diagn2012; 12: 111–4.
50.
FanHCBlumenfeldYJChitkaraUHudginsLQuakeSR. Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2008; 105: 16266–71.
51.
TsuiNBKadirRAChanKCChiCMellarsGTuddenhamEGLeungTYLauTKChiuRWLoYM. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia by microfluidics digital PCR analysis of maternal plasma DNA. Blood2011; 117: 3684–91.
52.
BarrettANMcDonnellTCChanKCChittyLS. Digital PCR analysis of maternal plasma for noninvasive detection of sickle cell anemia. Clin Chem2012; 58: 1026–32.
53.
TsuiNBHylandCAGardenerGJDanonDFiskNMMillardGFlowerRLLoYM. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping by microfluidics digital PCR using maternal plasma from two alloimmunized women with the variant RHD(IVS3+1G>A) allele. Prenat Diagn2013; 33: 1214–6.
54.
HahnTDreseKSO’SullivanCK. Microsystem for isolation of fetal DNA from maternal plasma by preparative size separation. Clin Chem2009; 55: 2144–52.
55.
Kersaudy-KerhoasMKavanaghDMDhariwalRSCampbellCJDesmulliezMP. Validation of a blood plasma separation system by biomarker detection. Lab Chip2010; 10: 1587–95.
56.
HuangRBarberTASchmidtMATompkinsRGTonerMBianchiDWKapurRFlejterWL. A microfluidics approach for the isolation of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) from the peripheral blood of pregnant women. Prenat Diagn2008; 28: 892–9.
57.
KavanaghDMKersaudy-KerhoasMDhariwalRSDesmulliezMP. Current and emerging techniques of fetal cell separation from maternal blood. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci2010; 878: 1905–11.
58.
LeeDSukumarPMahyuddinAChoolaniMXuG. Separation of model mixtures of epsilon-globin positive fetal nucleated red blood cells and anucleate erythrocytes using a microfluidic device. J Chromatogr A2010; 1217: 1862–6.
59.
MohamedHTurnerJNCagganaM. Biochip for separating fetal cells from maternal circulation. J Chromatogr A2007; 1162: 187–92.
60.
HoSSChuaCGoleLBiswasAKoayEChoolaniM. Same-day prenatal diagnosis of common chromosomal aneuploidies using microfluidics-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn2012; 32: 321–8.
61.
AkagiJKhoshmaneshKEvansBHallCJCrosierKECooperJMCrosierPSWlodkowicD. Miniaturized embryo array for automated trapping, immobilization and microperfusion of zebrafish embryos. PLoS One2012; 7: e36630–e36630.
62.
ZhuFWighAFriedrichTDevauxABonySNugegodaDKaslinJWlodkowicD. Automated lab-on-a-chip technology for fish embryo toxicity tests performed under continuous microperfusion (muFET). Environ Sci Technol2015; 49: 14570–8.
63.
BlundellCTessERSchanzerASCoutifarisCSuEJParrySHuhD. A microphysiological model of the human placental barrier. Lab Chip2016; 16: 3065–73.
64.
LeeJSRomeroRHanYMKimHCKimCJHongJSHuhD. Placenta-on-a-chip: a novel platform to study the biology of the human placenta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2016; 29: 1046–54.
65.
SiegelRLMillerKDJemalA. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin2016; 66: 7–30.
66.
ShadfanBHSimmonsARSimmonsGWHoAWongJLuKHBastRCJrMcDevittJT. A multiplexable, microfluidic platform for the rapid quantitation of a biomarker panel for early ovarian cancer detection at the point-of-care. Cancer Prev Res (Phila)2015; 8: 37–48.
67.
ZhaoZYangYZengYHeM. A microfluidic ExoSearch chip for multiplexed exosome detection towards blood-based ovarian cancer diagnosis. Lab Chip2016; 16: 489–96.
68.
WangCHWengCHCheYJWangKLeeGB. Cancer cell-specific oligopeptides selected by an integrated microfluidic system from a phage display library for ovarian cancer diagnosis. Theranostics2015; 5: 431–42.
69.
HuaSWilliamsCCDimapasocLMRoGSOzcanSMiyamotoSLebrillaCBAnHJLeiserowitzGS. Isomer-specific chromatographic profiling yields highly sensitive and specific potential N-glycan biomarkers for epithelial ovarian cancer. J Chromatogr A2013; 1279: 58–67.
70.
HungLYWangCHHsuKFChouCYLeeGB. An on-chip Cell-SELEX process for automatic selection of high-affinity aptamers specific to different histologically classified ovarian cancer cells. Lab Chip2014; 14: 4017–28.
71.
PetersonVMCastroCMChungJMillerNCUllalAVCastanoMDPensonRTLeeHBirrerMJWeisslederR. Ascites analysis by a microfluidic chip allows tumor-cell profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2013; 110: E4978–86.
DasTMeunierLBarbeLProvencherDGuenatOGervaisTMes-MassonAM. Empirical chemosensitivity testing in a spheroid model of ovarian cancer using a microfluidics-based multiplex platform. Biomicrofluidics2013; 7: 11805–11805.
74.
AstolfiMPeantBLateefMARoussetNKendall-DupontJCarmonaEMonetFSaadFProvencherDMes-MassonAMGervaisT. Micro-dissected tumor tissues on chip: an ex vivo method for drug testing and personalized therapy. Lab Chip2016; 16: 312–25.
75.
LienKYChuangYHHungLYHsuKFLaiWWHoCLChouCYLeeGB. Rapid isolation and detection of cancer cells by utilizing integrated microfluidic systems. Lab Chip2010; 10: 2875–86.
76.
ChenZDaiYDongZLiMMuXZhangRWangZZhangWLangJLengJJiangX. Co-cultured endometrial stromal cells and peritoneal mesothelial cells for an in vitro model of endometriosis. Integr Biol (Camb)2012; 4: 1090–5.
77.
ChenCHMillerMASarkarABesteMTIsaacsonKBLauffenburgerDAGriffithLGHanJ. Multiplexed protease activity assay for low-volume clinical samples using droplet-based microfluidics and its application to endometriosis. J Am Chem Soc2013; 135: 1645–8.
78.
KimHJLeeJChoiJHBahinskiAIngberDE. Co-culture of living microbiome with microengineered human intestinal villi in a gut-on-a-chip microfluidic device. J Vis Exp2016; 114: e54344–e54344.
79.
MaBForneyLJRavelJ. Vaginal microbiome: rethinking health and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol2012; 66: 371–89.
80.
ChaseDGoulderAZenhausernFMonkBHerbst-KralovetzM. The vaginal and gastrointestinal microbiomes in gynecologic cancers: a review of applications in etiology, symptoms and treatment. Gynecol Oncol2015; 138: 190–200.
81.
BrotmanRMShardellMDGajerPFadroshDChangKSilverMIViscidiRPBurkeAERavelJGravittPE. Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause2014; 21: 450–8.
