Biomaterials for tissue engineering provide scaffolds to support cells and guide tissue regeneration. Despite significant advances in biomaterials design and fabrication techniques, engineered tissue constructs remain functionally inferior to native tissues. This is largely due to the inability to recreate the complex and dynamic hierarchical organization of the extracellular matrix components, which is intimately linked to a tissue’s biological function. This review discusses current state-of-the-art strategies to control the spatial presentation of physical and biochemical cues within a biomaterial to recapitulate native tissue organization and function.
TibbittMWRodellCBBurdickJAAnsethKS. Progress in material design for biomedical applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2015; 112: 14444–51.
9.
LutolfMPHubbellJA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol2005; 23: 47–55.
10.
BajajPSchwellerRMKhademhosseiniAWestJLBashirR. 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng2014; 16: 247–76.
11.
BurdickJAMurphyWL. Moving from static to dynamic complexity in hydrogel design. Nat Commun2012; 3: 1269–1269.
12.
AbbahSADelgadoLMAzeemAFullerKShologuNKeeneyMBiggsMJPanditAZeugolisDI. Harnessing hierarchical nano- and micro-fabrication technologies for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Adv Healthcare Mater2015; 4: 2488–99.
WylieRGAhsanSAizawaYMaxwellKLMorsheadCMShoichetMS. Spatially controlled simultaneous patterning of multiple growth factors in three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater2011; 10: 799–806.
17.
DeForestCAAnsethKS. Cytocompatible click-based hydrogels with dynamically tunable properties through orthogonal photoconjugation and photocleavage reactions. Nat Chem2011; 3: 925–31.
18.
PashuckETStevensMM. Designing regenerative biomaterial therapies for the clinic. Sci Transl Med2012; 4: 160sr4–160sr4.
19.
RiceJJMartinoMMDe LaporteLTortelliFBriquezPSHubbellJA. Engineering the regenerative microenvironment with biomaterials. Adv Healthcare Mater2012; 2: 57–71.
20.
KyburzKAAnsethKS. Synthetic mimics of the extracellular matrix: how simple is complex enough?Ann Biomed Eng2015; 43: 489–500.
21.
JansonIAPutnamAJ. Extracellular matrix elasticity and topography: material-based cues that affect cell function via conserved mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res2015; 103: 1246–58.
22.
CharrasGSahaiE. Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol2014; 15: 813–24.
23.
PelhamRJWangYL. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1997; 94: 13661–5.
HuebschNAranyPRMaoASShvartsmanDAliOABencherifSARivera-FelicianoJMooneyDJ. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater2010; 9: 518–26.
BaeHChuHEdalatFChaJMSantSKashyapAAhariAFKwonCHNicholJWManoucheriSZamanianBWangYKhademhosseiniA. Development of functional biomaterials with micro- and nanoscale technologies for tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2014; 8: 1–14.
33.
KimD-HProvenzanoPPSmithCLLevchenkoA. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J Cell Biol2012; 197: 351–60.
34.
GuvendirenMBurdickJA. Stem cell response to spatially and temporally displayed and reversible surface topography. Adv Healthcare Mater2013; 2: 155–64.
35.
HuJHardyCChenC-MYangSVoloshinASLiuY. Enhanced cell adhesion and alignment on micro-wavy patterned surfaces. PLoS One2014; 9: e104502–e104502.
36.
McCullenSDAutefageHCallananAGentlemanEStevensMM. Anisotropic fibrous scaffolds for articular cartilage regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A2012; 18: 2073–83.
37.
CaliariSRHarleyBAC. The effect of anisotropic collagen-GAG scaffolds and growth factor supplementation on tendon cell recruitment, alignment, and metabolic activity. Biomaterials2011; 32: 5330–40.
38.
CaliariSRHarleyBAC. Structural and biochemical modification of a collagen scaffold to selectively enhance MSC tenogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation. Adv Healthcare Mater2014; 3: 1086–96.
39.
HuebschNLippensELeeKMehtaMKoshySTDarnellMCDesaiRMMadlCMXuMZhaoXChaudhuriOVerbekeCKimWSAlimKMammotoAIngberDEDudaGNMooneyDJ. Matrix elasticity of void-forming hydrogels controls transplanted-stem-cell-mediated bone formation. Nat Mater2015; 14: 1269–77.
NguyenLHKudvaAKSaxenaNSRoyK. Engineering articular cartilage with spatially-varying matrix composition and mechanical properties from a single stem cell population using a multi-layered hydrogel. Biomaterials2011; 32: 1–7.
47.
ChowLWArmgarthASt-PierreJ-PBertazzoSGentiliniCAurisicchioCMcCullenSDSteeleJAMStevensMM. Peptide-directed spatial organization of biomolecules in dynamic gradient scaffolds. Adv Healthcare Mater2014; 3: 1381–6.
48.
KhademhosseiniALangerRBorensteinJVacantiJP. Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2006; 103: 2480–7.
CustódioCAFriasAMdel CampoAReisRLManoJF. Selective cell recruitment and spatially controlled cell attachment on instructive chitosan surfaces functionalized with antibodies. Biointerphases2012; 7: 1–9.
56.
DaveySKAungAAgrawalGLimHLKarMVargheseS. Embedded 3D photopatterning of hydrogels with diverse and complex architectures for tissue engineering and disease models. Tissue Eng Part C Methods2015; 21: 1188–96.
57.
MosiewiczKAKolbLvan der VliesAJMartinoMMLienemannPSHubbellJAEhrbarMLutolfMP. In situ cell manipulation through enzymatic hydrogel photopatterning. Nat Mater2013; 12: 1072–8.
58.
LeeTTGarcíaJRPaezJISinghAPhelpsEAWeisSShafiqZShekaranAdel CampoAGarcIaAJ. Light-triggered in vivo activation of adhesive peptides regulates cell adhesion, inflammation and vascularization of biomaterials. Nat Mater2015; 14: 352–60.
59.
AizawaYWylieRShoichetM. Endothelial cell guidance in 3D patterned scaffolds. Adv Mater Weinheim2010; 22: 4831–5.
60.
AzagarsamyMAAnsethKS. Bioorthogonal click chemistry: an indispensable tool to create multifaceted cell culture scaffolds. ACS Macro Lett2012; 2: 5–9.
61.
TangWBeckerML. “Click” reactions: a versatile toolbox for the synthesis of peptide-conjugates. Chem Soc Rev2014; 43: 7013–39.
62.
DeForestCASimsEAAnsethKS. Peptide-functionalized click hydrogels with independently tunable mechanics and chemical functionality for 3D cell culture. Chem Mater2010; 22: 4783–90.
63.
DeForestCAAnsethKS. Photoreversible patterning of biomolecules within click-based hydrogels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl2012; 51: 1816–9.
HartgerinkJD. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science2001; 294: 1684–8.
71.
HartgerinkJDBeniashEStuppSI. Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: a versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2002; 99: 5133–8.
72.
ZhangSGreenfieldMAMataAPalmerLCBittonRManteiJRAparicioCla Cruz deMOStuppSI. A self-assembly pathway to aligned monodomain gels. Nat Mater2010; 9: 594–601.
73.
McClendonMTStuppSI. Tubular hydrogels of circumferentially aligned nanofibers to encapsulate and orient vascular cells. Biomaterials2012; 33: 5713–22.
74.
CapitoRMAzevedoHSVelichkoYSMataAStuppSI. Self-assembly of large and small molecules into hierarchically ordered sacs and membranes. Science2008; 319: 1812–6.
75.
CarvajalDBittonRManteiJRVelichkoYSStuppSIShullKR. Physical properties of hierarchically ordered self-assembled planar and spherical membranes. Soft Matter2010; 6: 1816–1816.
76.
ChowLWBittonRWebberMJCarvajalDShullKRSharmaAKStuppSI. A bioactive self-assembled membrane to promote angiogenesis. Biomaterials2011; 32: 1574–82.
77.
BittonRChowLWZhaRHVelichkoYSPashuckETStuppSI. Electrostatic control of structure in self-assembled membranes. Small2013; 10: 500–5.
78.
VelichkoYSManteiJRBittonRCarvajalDShullKRStuppSI. Electric field controlled self-assembly of hierarchically ordered membranes. Adv Funct Mater2011; 22: 369–77.
79.
GasiorowskiJZCollierJH. Directed intermixing in multicomponent self-assembling biomaterials. Biomacromolecules2011; 12: 3549–58.
80.
HudallaGASunTGasiorowskiJZHanHTianYFChongASCollierJH. Gradated assembly of multiple proteins into supramolecular nanomaterials. Nat Mater2014; 13: 829–36.
81.
CaliariSRWeisgerberDWGrierWKMahmassaniZBoppartMDHarleyBAC. Collagen scaffolds incorporating coincident gradations of instructive structural and biochemical cues for osteotendinous junction engineering. Adv Healthcare Mater2015; 4: 831–7.
82.
CaldwellDJRaoRRStegemannJP. Assembly of discrete collagen-chitosan microenvironments into multiphase tissue constructs. Adv Healthcare Mater2013; 2: 673–7.
TayiASPashuckETNewcombCJMcClendonMTStuppSI. Electrospinning bioactive supramolecular polymers from water. Biomacromolecules2014; 15: 1323–7.
85.
WadeRJBassinEJGramlichWMBurdickJA. Nanofibrous hydrogels with spatially patterned biochemical signals to control cell behavior. Adv Mater Weinheim2015; 27: 1356–62.
86.
SundararaghavanHGBurdickJA. Gradients with depth in electrospun fibrous scaffolds for directed cell behavior. Biomacromolecules2011; 12: 2344–50.
87.
HarrisonRHSteeleJChapmanRGormleyAJChowLWMahatMMPodhorskaLPalgraveRGPayneDJHettiaratchySPDunlopIEStevensMM. Modular and versatile spatial functionalization of tissue engineering scaffolds through fiber-initiated controlled radical polymerization. Adv Funct Mater2015; 25: 5748–57.
HighleyCBRodellCBBurdickJA. Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv Mater Weinheim2015; 27: 5075–9.
90.
HintonTJJalleratQPalcheskoRNParkJHGrodzickiMSShueH-JRamadanMHHudsonARFeinbergAW. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv2015; 1: e1500758–8.
91.
ColosiCShinSRManoharanVMassaSCostantiniMBarbettaADokmeciMRDentiniMKhademhosseiniA. Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink. Adv Mater Weinheim2016; 28: 677–84.
