Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2001-2
Comments to the Editor Concerning the Paper Entitled “Reproductive Malformation of the Male Offspring Following Maternal Exposure to Estrogenic Chemicals” by C. Gupta
NagelSC, vom SaalFS, ThayerKA, DharMG, BoechlerM, WelshonsWV. Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol. Environ Health Perspect105:(1):70–76, 1997.
2.
AshbyJ, TinwellH, HasemanJ.Lack of effects for low dose levels of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on the prostate gland of CF1 mice exposed in ulero. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol30: 156–166, 1999.
3.
CagenSZ, WaechterJMJr., DimondSS, BreslinWJ, ButalaJH, JekalFW, JoinerRL, ShiotsukaRN, VeenstraGE, HarrisLR. Normal reproductive organ development in CF-1 mice following prenatal exposure to bisphenol A. Toxicol Sci50: 36–44, 1999.
4.
vom SaalFS, TimmsBG, MontanoMM, PalanzaP, ThayerKA, NagelSC, MinatiDD, GanjamVK, ParmigianiS, WelshonsWV. Prostate enlargement in mice due to fetal exposure to low doses of estradiol or diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA94: 2056–2061, 1997.
5.
GuptaC.Reproductive malformation of the male offspring following maternal exposure to estrogenic chemicals. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med224: 61–68, 2000.
6.
WeilCS. Selection of the valid number of sampling units and a consideration of their combination in toxicological studies involving reproduction, teratogenesis or carcinogensis. Fd Cosmet Toxicol8: 177–182, 1970.
7.
HasemanJK, HoganMD. Selection of the experimental unit in teratology studies. Teratology12(2):65–171, 1975.
8.
TamuraRN, Buelke-SamJ.The use of repeated measures analysis in developmental toxicology studies. Ncurotox Teratol14: 205–210, 1992.
9.
ClarkeRL. Endpoints of reproductive system development. In: DastonG, KimmelC, Eds. An Evaluation and Interpretation of Reproductive Endpoints for Human Health Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: ILSI Press, pp 10–27, 1998.
10.
GallavanRHJr., HolsonJF, StumpDG, KnappJF, ReynoldsVL. Interpreting the toxicologic significance of alterations in anogenital distance: potential for confounding effects of progeny body weights. Reprod Toxicol13: 383–390, 1999.
11.
ShirleyE.The analysis of organ weight data. Toxicology8: 13–22, 1977.
12.
ShirleyE, NewnhamP.The choice between analysis of variance and analysis of covariance with special reference to the analysis of organ weights in toxicology studies. Stat Med3: 85–91, 1984.
13.
MeiselR, WardI.Fetal female rats are masculinized by male litter-mates located caudally in the uterus. Science213: 239–242, 1981.
14.
vom SaalFS, BronsonFH. In utero proximity of female mouse fetuses to males: Effect on reproductive performance during later life. Biol Reprod19: 842–853, 1978.
15.
VandendberghJG, HuggeltCL. The anogenital distance index, a predictor of the intrauterine position effects on reproduction in female house mice. Lab Anim Sci45:(5):567–573, 1995.
16.
ElswickBA, WelschF, JanszenDB. Effect of different sampling designs on outcome of endocrine disruptor studies. Reprod Toxicol14: 359–367, 2000.
17.
LarsonDA. Analysis of variance with just summary statistics as input. Amer Statist46: 151–152, 1993.