CamenischPF.Grounding Professional Ethics in a Pluralistic Society. New York: Haven, p48, 1983.
2.
PavalkoRM.Sociology of Occupations and Professions. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock, p25, 1971.
3.
TouhyCJ, WolfsonAD.The political economy of professionalism: A perspective. In: Four Aspects of Professionalism. Ottawa: Consumer Research Council, p67, 1977.
4.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Scientific Conduct, p2, 1994.
5.
U.S. Department of Health, Human Services. Public Health Service.Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science. Fed Regist54:32446-32451, 1989.
6.
U.S. National Science Foundation.Misconduct in science and engineering: Final rule. Fed Regist56:22287-22290, 1991.
7.
American Association for the Advancement of Science.Citation on the Scientific Freedom and Responsibility Award presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, CA, 1989.
8.
SwazeyJP, AndersonMS, LewisKS.Ethical problems in academic research. Am Sci81:542-553, 1993.
9.
LubalinJS, ArdiniME, MathesonJL.Consequences of Whistleblowing for the Whistleblower in Misconduct in Science Cases. Final Report. Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute, pp18–24, 1995.
10.
Commission on Research Integrity.Integrity and Misconduct in Science. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, pp22–24, 1995.