LaFolletteMC.Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science, 1910–1955. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
2.
McDonaldKA.Too many co-authors? Chron Higher Ed41:A35-A36, 1995.
3.
LockS, WellsF.Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (2nd ed). London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1996.
4.
SpencerF.Piltdown: A scientific forgery. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
5.
WeinerJS.The Piltdown Forgery. New York: Oxford University Press, 1955.
6.
LaFolletteMC.Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Other Misconduct in Scientific Publishing. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
7.
HixsonJ.The Patchwork Mouse. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press/Doubleday, p220, 1976.
8.
McBrideG.The Sloan-Kettering affair: Could it have happened anywhere?JAMA229:1391-1410, 1974.
9.
RelmanAS.Lessons from the Darsee affair. N Engl J Med308:1415-1417, 1983.
10.
U.S. House of Representatives.Fraud in Biomedical Research, 1981: Hearings Before the Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, 97th Cong., 1st Sess., 1981.
11.
LaFolletteMC.A foundation of trust: Scientific misconduct, Congressional oversight, and the regulatory response. In: Braxton JM, Ed. Perspectives on Scholarly Misconduct in the Sciences. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, pp11–41, 1999.
12.
AberbachJD.Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1990.
13.
U.S. House of Representatives.Scientific fraud and misconduct and the federal response, 1988: Hearing of the Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations, 100th Cong., 1st Sess., 11 April, 1988.
14.
U.S. House of Representatives.Scientific Fraud and Misconduct in the National Institutes of Health Biomedical Grant Programs, 1988: Hearing of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 100th Cong., 1st Sess., 12 April, 1988.
15.
KevlesDJ.The Baltimore Affair: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character. New York: WW Norton & Co, 1998.
16.
SarasohnJ.Science On Trial: The Whistle Blower, the Accused, and the Nobel Laureate. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993.
17.
ValentinePW.Drug therapy researcher is indicted. Wash Post111:A1, A14, 1988.
18.
WheelerDL.Researcher is indicted for falsifying data and impeding investigation of his work. Chron Higher Ed34:A4, A12, 1988.
19.
ZurerPS.Researcher criminally charged with fraud. Chem Eng News66:5, 1988.
20.
GarfieldE, Welljams-DorofA.The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature: The Stephen E. Breuning case. In: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Chicago, IL, 10–12 May 1989. Chicago: Council of Biology Editors, p 53, 1991.
21.
AngellM, RelmanAS.A time for congressional restraint. N Engl J Med318:1462-1463, 1988.
22.
SteneckNH.Research universities and scientific misconduct: History, policies, and the future. J Higher Ed65:310-330, 1994.
23.
DaltonR.Journals slow to retract Slutsky research errors. The Scientist2:1, 4, 1988.
24.
HostetierAJ.Fear of suits blocks retractions. The Scientist1:1-2, 1987.
25.
U.S. House of Representatives.Scientific Fraud and Misconduct: The Institutional Response, 1989: Hearing of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 101st Cong., 1st Sess., 9 May, 1989.
26.
U.S. House of Representatives.Scientific Fraud, 1990: Hearing of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess., 14 May, 1990.
27.
U.S. House of Representatives.Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, 1990: Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Research, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess., 1990.
28.
BuzzelliDE.The definition of misconduct in science: A view from NSF. Science259:584-585, 647–648, 1993.
29.
BulgerRE, HeitmanE, ReiserSJ.The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
30.
PeekRP, NewbyGB.Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.
31.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Retraction of research findings. BMJ296:400, 1988.
32.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Retraction of research findings. BMJ302:338-341, 1991.
33.
ArmstrongJA.Research and competitiveness: Problems of a new rationale. The Bridge23:3-10, 1993.
34.
SmithBLR. The accountability of science. Minerva34:45-56, 1996.