Research conducted since the early 1990s has suggested that elections designed to delimit the rights of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals carry the potential for significant negative psychological consequences. Research has also suggested that some LGB people use these elections as opportunities for positive individual and social change. Virtually all of the research on the psychological impact of anti-LGB elections has focused on the immediate aftermath of these political events. This article reports results from a qualitative study designed to explore community members’ perceptions of the longer term impact of the full cycle of Colorado’s Amendment 2, including the campaign, election, and judicial reversal. The results from interviews with a purposive sample of LGB and heterosexual informants offer commentaries on the enduring impact of Amendment 2 at the levels of individuals, the LGBT community, and the broader community.
ArmJ. R.HorneS. G.LevittH. M. (2009). Negotiating connection to GLBT experience: Family members’ experience of anti-GLBT movements and policies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 82-96.
2.
BallC. A. (2006). The backlash thesis and same-sex marriage: Learning from Brown v. Board of Education and its aftermath. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 14, 1-48.
3.
BrownL. S. (2008). Cultural competence in trauma therapy: Beyond the flashback. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
BullisC.BachB. W. (1996). Feminism and the disenfranchised: Listening beyond the “other.” In RayE. B. (Ed.), Communication and disenfranchisement: Social health issues and implication (pp. 3-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (1999). Facilitating posttraumatic growth: A clinician’s guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
ConradC. (1983). The rhetoric of the moral majority: An analysis of romantic form. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 159-170.
8.
DonovanT.BowlerS. (1997). Direct democracy and minority rights: Opinions on anti-gay and lesbian ballot initiatives. In WittS. L.McCorkleS. (Eds.), Anti-gay rights: Assessing voter initiatives (pp. 107-125). Westport, CT: Praeger.
9.
DouglassD. (1997). Taking the initiative: Anti-homosexual propaganda of the Oregon Citizens’ Alliance. In WittS. L.McCorkleS. (Eds.), Anti-gay rights: Assessing voter initiatives (pp. 17-32). Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
EastlandL. S. (1996). The reconstruction of identity: Strategies of the Oregon Citizens’ Alliance. In RayE. B. (Ed.), Communication and disenfranchisement: Social health issues and implication (pp. 59-75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
EsterbergK.LonghoferJ. (1998). Researching the radical right: Responses to anti-lesbian/gay initiatives. In RistockJ. L.TaylorC. G. (Eds.), Inside the academy and out: Lesbian/gay/queer studies and social action (pp. 183-198). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12.
GambleB. S. (1997). Putting civil rights to a popular vote. Journal of Political Science, 41, 245-269.
13.
GergenK. G. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
14.
HermanD. (1993). Beyond the rights debate. Social and Legal Studies, 2, 25-43.
15.
HermanD. (1997). The antigay agenda: Orthodox visions and the Christian Right. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
HerekG. M. (1998). Bad science in the service of stigma: A critique of the Cameron group’s survey studies. In HerekG. M. (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation (pp. 223-255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Human Rights Campaign. (2009). Statewide marriage prohibition. Retrieved November 1, 2009, from http://www.hrc.org/state_laws
18.
Janoff-BullmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.
19.
LevittH. M.OureboE.AndersonM. B.LeoneC.JeongJ. Y.ArmJ. R.. (2009). Balancing dangers: GLBT experience in a time of anti-GLBT legislation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 67-81.
MeyerI. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 3, 38-56.
22.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674-697.
23.
MeyerI. H. (2007). Prejudice and discrimination as social stressors. In MeyerI. H.NorthridgeM. E. (Eds.), The health of sexual minorities: Public health perspectives in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations (pp. 242-267). New York: Springer.
24.
OlesonV. (2005). Early millennial feminist qualitative research: Challenges and cautions. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 235-278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
RiggleE. D. B.ThomasJ. D.RostoskyS. S. (2005). The marriage debate and minority stress. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38, 221-224.
26.
RiggleE. D. B.RostoskyS. S. (2007). The consequences of marriage policy for same-sex couple well-being. In RimmermanC.WilcoxC. (Eds.), The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 65-84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
RootM. P. P. (1992). Reconstructing the impact of trauma on personality. In BrownL. S.BallouM. (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 229-265). New York: Guilford.
28.
RostoskyS. S.RiggleE. D. B.HorneS. G.MillerA. D. (2009). Marriage amendments and psychological distress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 56-66.
29.
RostoskyS. S.RiggleE. D. B.HorneS. G.DentonF. N.HuellemeierJ. D. (in press). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals’ psychological reactions to amendments denying access to civil marriage. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.
30.
RussellG. M. (2000). Voted out: The psychological consequences of anti-gay politics. New York: New York University Press.
31.
RussellG. M.BohanJ. S. (2007). Liberating psychology: Liberation psychology and psychotherapy with LGBT clients. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 11, 59-75.
32.
RussellG. M.BohanJ. S.LillyD. (2000). Queer youth: Old stories, new stories. In JonesS. (Ed.), A sea of stories: The shaping power of narrative in gay and lesbian cultures (pp. 69-92). New York: Harrington Park Press.
33.
RussellG. M.RichardsJ. A. (2003). Stressor and resilience factors for lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals confronting antigay politics. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 313-328.
34.
SmithR. R.WindesR. R. (1997). The progay and antigay issue culture: Interpretation, influence, and dissent. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83, 28-48.
35.
SmithR. R.WindesR. R. (2000). Progay/antigay: The rhetorical war over sexuality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
SternA. (2001). The stranger next door: The story of a small community’s battle over sex, faith, and civil rights. Boston: Beacon.
38.
WhillockR. K. (1995). The use of hate as a strategy for achieving political and social goals. In WhillockR. K.SlaydenD. (Eds.), Hate speech (pp. 28-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
WieskoffC. (2002). Naming, blaming, and claiming in public disputes: The 1998 Maine referendum in civil rights protection for gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 44, 61-82.
