Though relatively understudied, trauma exposure and resulting posttraumatic stress symptoms are common in college students. Web-based surveys allow for private, cost-effective, and time-efficient assessment of trauma and its sequelae in this at-risk population. This study examines two issues pertinent to Internet assessment of trauma and posttraumatic stress: (a) the reliability of the Internet compared with paper-and-pencil and interview assessments and (b) the acceptability of this assessment modality to students. College students (N = 38) completed a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) clinical interview and paper-and-pencil and online versions of trauma and PTSD questionnaires. Results showed in-person and online trauma and PTSD assessments to be significantly associated with each other and with the clinical interview. Participants reported positive reactions to the online survey. Findings suggest that the Internet can reliably and unobtrusively assess potentially sensitive topics in college students.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Amir, M., & Sol, O. (1999). Psychological impact and prevalence of traumatic events in a student sample in Israel: The effect of multiple traumatic events and physical injury. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 12, 139-154.
4.
Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist , 55, 469-480.
5.
Becker-Blease, K.A., & Freyd, J.J. (2006). Research participants telling the truth about their lives: The ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. American Psychologist, 61, 218-226.
6.
Bernat, J.A., Ronfeldt, H.M., Calhoun, K.S., & Arias, I. (1998). Prevalence of traumatic events and peritraumatic predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms in a nonclinical sample of college students. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11, 645-664.
7.
Blake, D.D., Weathers, F.W., Nagy, L.M., Kaloupek, D.G., Gusman, F.D., Charney, D.S., et al. (1995). The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 75-90.
8.
Blanchard, E.B., Jones-Alexander, J., Buckley, T.C., & Forneris, C.A. (1996). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behavior Research and Therapy , 34, 669-673.
9.
Butler, L.D., Blasey, C.M., Garlan, R.W., McCaslin, S.E., Azarow, J., Chen, X.H., et al. (2005). Posttraumatic growth following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001: Cognitive, coping, and trauma symptom predictors in an internet convenience sample. Traumatology, 11, 247-267.
10.
Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
11.
Keane, T.M., Newman, E., & Orsillo, S.M. (1995). Assessment of military-related posttraumatic stress disorder. In J. P. Wilson & T. M. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. New York: Guilford Press.
12.
Kubany, E.S., Haynes, S.Y., Leisen, M.B., Owens, J.A., Kaplan, A.S., Watson, S.B., et al. (2000). Development and preliminary validation of a brief broad-spectrum measure of trauma exposure: The Traumatic Life Events Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 12, 210-224.
13.
Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D.G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 383-394.
14.
Parks, K.A., Pardi, A.M., & Bradizza, C.M. (2006). Collecting data on alcohol use and alcohol-related victimization: A comparison of telephone and web-based survey methods. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 318-323.
15.
Prins, A., Ouimette, P., Kimerling, R., Cameron, R., Hugleshofer, D., Shaw-Hegwar, J., et al. (2003). The Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD): Development and operating characteristics. Primary Care Psychiatry , 9, 9-14.
16.
Purves, D.G., & Erwin, P.G. (2002). A study of posttraumatic stress in a student population . Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 89-96.
17.
Ruggiero, K.J., Del Ben, K., Scotti, J.R., & Rabalais, A.E. (2003). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 495-502.
18.
Schlenger, W.E., Caddell, J.M., Ebert, L., Jordan, B.K., Rourke, K.M., Wilson, M.S., et al. (2002). Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 581-588.
19.
Schlenger, W.E., & Silver, R.C. (2006). Web-based methods in terrorism and disaster research . Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 185-193.
20.
Schulenberg, J., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., Wadsworth, K.N., & Johnston, L.D. (1996). Getting drunk and growing up: Trajectories of frequent binge drinking during the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 289-304.
21.
Silver, R.C., Holman, E.A., McIntosh, D.N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1235-1244.
22.
Vrana, S., & Lauterbach, D. (1994). Prevalence of traumatic events and post-traumatic psychological symptoms in a nonclinical sample of college students. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 289-302.
23.
Walker, E.A., Newman, E., Koss, M., & Bernstein, D. (1997). Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims? General Hospital Psychiatry, 19, 403-410.
24.
Weathers, F.W., Huska, J.A., & Keane, T.M. (1991). The PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). Available from F. W. Weathers, National Center for PTSD, Boston VAMC, Boston.
25.
Weathers, F.W., Litz, B.T., Herman, D.S., Huska, J.A., & Keane, T.M. (1993, October). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TX.
