Loneliness and Belonging: A Reflection on the Meanings and Values of Social Networks in the Wake of the Virginia Tech Shootings

Abstract

This reflection draws on the author's personal and professional interest in social networks, social capital, and community to explore the implications of losing significant members of one's social network to catastrophic events such as the April 16, 2007, Virginia Tech (VT) shootings. Social theorists posit that the strength of weak ties comes from the opportunities that they present. Weak ties offer opportunities to meet others, expand networks, and become more embedded in our communities. Therefore, for the author, the events of 4/16 represent not only the loss of a friend but also a loss of opportunity. The VT shootings have pushed him to consider whether personal relationships and social networks can be objectified to the point that they may be managed. On a second analytical level, the shootings have pushed him to ask how local governments may incorporate social networks, community, and social capital into emergency planning and recovery efforts.

Keywords

social networks community social capital terror management theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bender, T. (1978). Community and social change in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Bliss, J.C. , & Flick, W.A. (1994). With a saw and a truck: Alabama Pulpwood Producers . Journal of Forest and Conservation History, 38, 79-89.

Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.

Gervich, C.D. (2004). Strengthening community by linking businesses: Forest dependent entrepreneurship in a Vermont town. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Vermont, Burlington.

Gervich, C.D. (2007, July 20). Learning from loss at Virginia Tech. The Chronicle of Higher Education, LIII, Number 46, p. B5.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.

Hinrichs, C.C. (1998). Sideline and lifeline: The cultural economy of maple syrup production. Rural Sociology, 63, 507-532.

Kemmis, D. (1996). Barn raising. In W. Vitek & W. Jackson (Eds.), Rooted in the land: Essays on community and place (pp. 166-175). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Lin, N. , Cook, K. , & Burt, R.S. (2001). Social capital theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

10.

McGoodwin, J. (1990). Crisis in the world's fisheries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

11.

Poplin, D. (1972). Community: A series of theories and methods. New York: Macmillan.

12.

Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster .

13.

Pyszczynski, T. , Solomon, S. , & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

14.

Raab, J. , & Milward, B. (2003). Dark networks as problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 413-439.

15.

Scherer, J. (1972). Contemporary community: Sociological illusion or reality? London: Tavistock.

16.

Steger, C.W. (2007, May). Virginia Tech Magazine Memorial Issue, 29(3), 1.

17.

Stokowski, P.A. (1994). Leisure in society: A network structural perspective . London: Mansell Publishers.

18.

Wasserman, S. , & Faust, K. (1994). Social networks analysis: Methods and application . Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Wilmott, P. (1986). Social networks, informal care, and public policy . London: Policy Studies Institute .