Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Motor vehicle incidents (MVIs) cause more death and injury than wars, acts of terrorism, and disasters put together. Their major cause is human error. The posttraumatic effects on victims of such errors have been well researched, but effects on the causers have not. The hypotheses of this study were that victims and causers of MVIs could be clinically distinguished and that such distinctions might be useful in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of MVIs. The results indicated two victim and two causer categories. The victim group contained posttraumatic-stress and vulnerable subgroups. The causer group contained antisocial and process-neurotic subgroups. Examples of each subgroup are provided. Clinical distinctions between victims and causer groups and subgroups can help to understand the variety of post-MVI symptoms and to achieve more sophisticated approaches to MVI treatment and prevention. It is emphasized that this is a pilot clinical study.

Keywords

motor vehicle accidents motor car accidents motor vehicle incidents posttraumatic stress disorder perpetrators vulnerability motor vehicle accident causation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blanchard, E.B. , & Hickling, E.J. (1997). After the crash: Assessment and treatment of motor vehicle accident survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bloom, S.L. (1999). The complex web of causation: Motor vehicle accidents, comorbidity and PTSD. In E. J. Hickling & E. B. Blanchard (Eds.), The international handbook of road traffic accidents and psychological trauma: Current understanding, treatment and law (pp. 155-184). Killington, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

Chan, A.W.K. (1987). Factors affecting the drinking driver. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 19, 99-119.

Ehlers, A. , Mayou R.A. , & Bryant, B. (1998). Psychological predictors of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder after motor vehicle accidents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 508-519.

Ford, C.V. (1978). A type of disability neurosis: The Humpty Dumpty syndrome. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine , 8, 285-294.

Hirschfeld, A.H. , & Behan, R.C. (1969). Disability. International Psychiatry Clinics, 6, 239-248.

Isherwood, J. , Adam, K.S. , & Hornblow, A.R. (1982). Life event stress, psychosocial factors, suicide attempt and auto-accident proclivity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 26, 371-383.

Norris, F.H. , Matthews, B.A. , & Riad, J.K. (2000). Characterological, situational, and behavioral risk factors for motor vehicle accidents: A prospective study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32, 505-515.

New York State Governor's Traffic Safety Committee. (2000). Aggressive driving. Available at http://www.nysgtsc.state.ny.us/aggr-ndx.htm

10.

Ohberg, A. , Penttila, A. , & Lonnqvist, J. (1997). Driver suicides. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 468-472.

11.

Richter, E.D. (1991). Fewer injuries but more deaths from road accidents during the Persian Gulf War. Israeli Journal of Medical Science , 27, 631-635.

12.

Simon, F. , & Corbett, C. (1996). Road traffic offending, stress, age, and accident history among male and female drivers. Ergonomics, 39, 757-780.

13.

Stewart, A.E. , & Lord, J.H. (2002). Motor vehicle crash versus accident: A change in terminology is necessary. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 333-335.

14.

Stewart, A.E. , & Lord, J.H. (2003). Some crashes are more unintentional than others: A reply to Blanchard, Hickling, and Kuhn. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 529-530.

15.

Valent, P. (1984). The Ash Wednesday bushfires in Victoria. Medical Journal of Australia, 141, 291-300.

16.

Wells-Parker, E. , Cosby, P.J. , & Landrum, J.W. (1986). A typology for drinking driving offenders: Methods for classification and policy implications. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 18, 443-453.

Clinical Observations of Causers and Victims of Motor Vehicle Incidents: Brief Report

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References