This study aimed to evaluate the impact of diabetic foot care training delivered using the Pecha Kucha (20*20) presentation method on the knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior levels of patients with Type 2 diabetes. Conducted between December 10, 2023, and October 7, 2024, this randomized controlled experimental study included 125 diabetic individuals, with 62 in the experimental group and 63 in the control group. The experimental group received diabetic foot care education using the Pecha Kucha method, while the control group received conventional education. Data were collected using the Patient Assessment Form, Diabetes Foot Knowledge Questionnaire, Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale. Statistical analyses revealed that the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scores in knowledge and self-efficacy compared to the control group (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was found in self-care behavior scores (p > 0.05). The results suggest that the Pecha Kucha method effectively enhances diabetic individuals’ knowledge and self-efficacy regarding foot care. However, further research is needed to explore its long-term impact on behavior changes. The study was registered in Clinical Trials (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06768645) with the registration number of “NCT06768645”.
YuenLSaeediPRiazM, et al.Projections of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in 2019 and beyond: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107841.
2.
HermanWHPetersenMKalyaniRR. Response to comment on American diabetes association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2017. Diabetes Care 2017; 40 (Suppl. 1): S1–S135. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(7):e94-e95. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci17-0007
3.
Turkish Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications. Bayt Scientific Research Press and Publishing Ltd. Co.; 2017.
4.
UitewaalPHoesAThomasS. Diabetes education on Turkish immigrant diabetics: Predictors of compliance. Patient Educ Couns.2005;57(2):158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.009
5.
ValensiPGirodIBaronFMoreau-DafergesTGuillonP. Quality of life and clincal correlates in patients with diyabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab. 2005;31(3):263-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70193-3Get rights and content.
6.
HaasLMaryniukMBeckJ, et al.National standards for diabetes self-management education and support – 2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;38(5):619-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721712455997
7.
EldorRRazIBenYABoultonAJ. New and experimental approaches to treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A comprehensive review of emerging treatment strategies. Diabet Med. 2004;21(11):1161-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01358.x
8.
ShokoohiMNedjatSMajdzadehR. A social network analysis on clinical education of diabetic foot. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013;12(44):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6581-12-44
9.
SchaperNCvan NettenJJApelqvistJ, et al.Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev.2020;63(2):e3266. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3266
10.
BusSAMonteiro-SoaresMGameF, et al.Standards for the development and methodology of the 2023 IWGDF guidelines. Diabetes Metab Res Rev.2024;40(3):e3656. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3656
11.
ArmstrongDGBoultonAJBusSA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med.2017;376(24):2367-2375.
12.
Yıldırım AyazEDıncerBOğuzA. The effect of foot care education for patients with diabetes on knowledge, self-efficacy and behavior: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Low Extrem Wounds.2022;21(3):234-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734622110904
13.
SetberthJHMillanziWCSeifSA. Enhancing nursing student presentation competences using Facilitatory Pecha kucha presentation pedagogy: A quasi-experimental study protocol in Tanzania. BMC Med Educ.2023;23(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04628-z
Ramos-RincónJMSempere-SelvaTSSRomero-NietoM, et al.Pecha Kucha presentations by medical students in Spain. Int J Med Educ.2018;9:244-245. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5b92.52e3
17.
DincerBBahçecikN. The effect of a mobile application on the foot care of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled study. Health Educ J.2021;80(4):425-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896920981617
18.
BiçerEKEnçN. Evaluation of foot care and self-efficacy in patients with diabetes in Turkey: An interventional study. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries.2016;36(3):334-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-016-0464-y
19.
GarciaAAVillagomezETBrownSA, et al.The starr county diabetes education study: Development of the Spanish-language diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(1):16-21. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.1.16
20.
QuarlesBE. Educational Methods Increasing Self-Efficacy for the Management of Foot Care in Adults with Diabetes and Implementation of Foot Care Behaviours. University of Kentucky; 2005.
Yıldırım AyazEDıncerBOğuzA. The effect of foot care education for patients with diabetes on knowledge, self-efficacy and behavior: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Low Extrem Wounds.2022;21(3):234-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734622110904
23.
SharonıAKhuzaimahSMinhatHSShariff-GhazaliSAzman OngMH. The effects of self-efficacy enhancing program on foot self-care behaviour of older adults with diabetes: A randomised controlled trial in elderly care facility, peninsular Malaysia. PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0192417.
24.
BahadorRSAfrazandehSSGhanbarzehiNEbrahimiM. The impact of three-month training programme on foot care and self-efficacy of patients with diabetic foot ulcers. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2017;11(7):1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/29025.10261
25.
VakilianPMahmoudiMOskouieFFirouzianAAKhachianA. Investigating the effect of educational intervention based on the Pender’s health promotion model on lifestyle and self- efficacy of the patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A clinical trial. J Educ Health Promot.2021;10(12):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1301_20
26.
SeyyedrasooliAParvanKValizadehLRahmaniAZareMIzadiT. Self-efficacy in foot-care and effect of training: A single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery.2015;3(2):141-149.
27.
JiangLLiuSLiHXieLJiangY. The role of health beliefs in affecting patients’ chronic diabetic complication screening: A path analysis based on the health belief model. J Clin Nurs.2021;30(19–20):2948-2959. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15802
28.
BriscoeCAboudF. Behaviour change communication targeting four health behaviours in developing countries: A review of change techniques. Soc Sci Med.2012;75(4):612-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.016
SaracogluKTYilmazMTuranAZKusAColakTSaracogluA. Pecha Kucha with part-task training improves airway management in fresh frozen cadavers: A case-control observational study. Med Princ Pract.2020;29(6):532-537. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506597
31.
KatiforiATsitouFPichouM, et al.Exploring the potential of visually-rich animated digital storytelling for cultural heritage. In: LiarokapisFVoulodimosADoulamisN, et al. eds. Visual computing for cultural heritage. Springer; 2020:325-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37191-3_17.
