Amputation is a major life event, impacting on all aspects of daily living, and has the goal of achieving maximal patient mobility and independence. The level of cognitive function of those patients who are assigned a prosthesis is an important consideration in the rehabilitation process. Therefore we set out to understand the relationship between cognitive functioning and functional and/or health outcomes following amputation secondary to a vascular condition. This systematic review searched five databases: PsycINFO, Cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL), Scopus, MEDLINE, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed English language articles that met the inclusion criteria. Two authors independently assessed suitability for inclusion, determined biases (Cochrane risk of bias assessment) and extracted data. Results are presented as associations determined on the balance of probabilities. A total of 14 studies were included, with a total of 6891 participants across six domains. Evidence of an association between cognitive function and prosthetic use, mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs) were found. Evidence revealed 83.3% association for cognition and mobility, 66.7% for cognition and ADL, and 62.5% for cognition and prosthetic use. The evidence was indeterminate for an association between cognitive function and living/discharge destination. There was insufficient weight of evidence to determine an association between cognitive function and general health or social participation. The associations found between cognitive function and prosthetic use, mobility and ADL highlight the need for cognitive assessment to form part of the postoperative pathway for vascular amputees.
UnwinN. Epidemiology of lower extremity amputation in centres in Europe, North America and East Asia. Br J Surg. 2000;87(3):328‐337.
2.
AryaSEscobarG. Principles of lower extremity amputation: etiology, goals, limb length decisions, and impact on prosthetic management. In: DavisAKellyBSpiresMC, eds. Prosthetic Restoration and Rehabilitation of the Upper and Lower Extremity. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2014:9-20.
3.
LimTSFinlaysonAThorpeJM, et al.Outcomes of a contemporary amputation series. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(5):300‐305.
4.
HaleC.Physiotherapy for people with major amputation. In: Porter SB, ed. Tidy’s Physiotherapy. 15th ed. Saunders Elsevier; 2013:457‐474.
5.
EngstromBVan de VenC.Therapy for Amputees. 3rd ed.Churchill Livingstone; 1999:352 p.
6.
SpiresMCKellyBMDavisAJ. Prosthetic Restoration and Rehabilitation of the Upper and Lower Extremity. 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2013.
7.
LeeDJCostelloMC. The effect of cognitive impairment on prosthesis use in older adults who underwent amputation due to vascular-related etiology: a systematic review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(2):144‐152.
8.
United Nations. World Population Ageing 2019. Division DoEaSAP; 2019. Contract No.: ST/ESA/SER.A/430.
9.
SalthouseTA. Trajectories of normal cognitive aging. Psychol Aging. 2019;34(1):17‐24.
10.
FletcherDDAndrewsKLButtersMAJacobsenSJRowlandCMHallettJW. Rehabilitation of the geriatric vascular amputee patient: a population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):776‐779.
11.
Lombard-VanceRO’KeeffeFDesmondDCoenRRyallNGallagherP.Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of cognitive functioning of adults with lower limb amputation in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(2):278‐288.e2.
12.
CoffeyLO’KeeffeFGallagherPDesmondDLombard-VanceR. Cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(23):1950‐1964.
13.
ÜlgerÖYıldırım ŞahanTÇelikSE. A systematic literature review of physiotherapy and rehabilitation approaches to lower-limb amputation. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34(11):821‐834.
14.
ResnikLBorgiaMSilverBCancioJ. Systematic review of measures of impairment and activity limitation for persons with upper limb trauma and amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(9):1863‐1892.
15.
SansamKNeumannVO’ConnorRBhaktaB.Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med (Stiftelsen Rehabiliteringsinformation). 2009;41(8):593‐603.
16.
SteinbergNGottliebASiev-NerIPlotnikM. Fall incidence and associated risk factors among people with a lower limb amputation during various stages of recovery—a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(15):1778‐1787.
17.
FleuryAMSalihSAPeelNM. Rehabilitation of the older vascular amputee: a review of the literature. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(2):264‐273.
18.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372(Mar 29th):n71.
19.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistG, et al.GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407‐415.
20.
HigginsJThomasJ, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.3 [updated 2022]. Cochrane; 2022.
21.
SallisJFProchaskaJJTaylorWC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents [Revue des facteurs en relation avec l'activite physique chez les enfants et les adolescents]. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(5):963‐975.
22.
HinkleyTSalmonJOkelyADTrostSG. Correlates of sedentary behaviours in preschool children: a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(1):66.
23.
RidgersNDSalmonJParrishA-MStanleyRMOkelyAD. Physical activity during school recess: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):320-328.
24.
TongeKLJonesRAOkelyAD. Correlates of children’s objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in early childhood education and care services: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2016;89(77):129‐139.
25.
KolteDKennedyKShishehborM, et al.Thirty-day readmissions after endovascular or surgical therapy for critical limb ischemia: analysis of the 2013 to 2014 nationwide readmissions databases. Circulation. 2017;136(2):167‐176.
26.
MillerWCSpeechleyMDeatheB. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1031‐1037.
27.
MillerWCSpeechleyMDeatheB. Balance confidence among people with lower-limb amputations. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):856‐865.
28.
RichardsonCGlennSHorganMNurmikkoT. A prospective study of factors associated with the presence of phantom limb pain six months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Pain. 2007;8(10):793‐801.
29.
RommersGMVosLDWGroothoffJWEismaWH. Clinical rehabilitation of the amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1996;20(2):72‐78.
30.
ThompsonDMHaranD. Living with an amputation. Int J Rehabil Res. 1984;7(3):283‐292.
31.
VisserLPrentAvan der LaanMJ, et al.Predicting postoperative delirium after vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(1):183‐189.
32.
MorganSJKellyVEAmtmannDSalemRHafnerBJ. Self-reported cognitive concerns in people with lower limb loss. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(6):912‐918.
33.
AtiçRAydınA. Comparison of the demographic and clinical characteristics, functional status and quality of life of lower extremity amputees to identify the reason for undergoing amputation. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(5):973‐979.
34.
CallaghanBCondieEJohnstonM. Using the common sense self-regulation model to determine psychological predictors of prosthetic use and activity limitations in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008;32(3):324‐336.
35.
KohnKHPerlmanLNeumannMHoE. A multiphasic study of lower-extremity amputees. JAMA. 1967;199(8):537‐542.
RemesLIsoahoRVahlbergTViitanenMKoskenvuoMRautavaP. Quality of life three years after major lower extremity amputation due to peripheral arterial disease. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010;22(5–6):395‐405.
38.
SansamKO’ConnorRJNeumannVBhaktaB. Can simple clinical tests predict walking ability after prosthetic rehabilitation?J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(11):968‐974.
39.
HunterSWBobosPFrengopoulosCMacphersonAVianaRPayneMW. Cognition predicts mobility change in lower extremity amputees between discharge from rehabilitation and 4-month follow-up: a prospective cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(11):2129-2135.
DillinghamTRPezzinLEShoreAD. Reamputation, mortality, and health care costs among persons with dysvascular lower-limb amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):480‐486.
42.
FrengopoulosCBurleyJVianaRPayneMWHunterSW. Association between Montreal cognitive assessment scores and measures of functional mobility in lower extremity amputees after inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3):450‐455.
43.
FrengopoulosCPayneMWVianaRHunterSW. MoCA domain score analysis and relation to mobility outcomes in dysvascular lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(2):314‐320.
44.
KellyVEMorganSJAmtmannDSalemRHafnerBJ. Association of self-reported cognitive concerns with mobility in people with lower limb loss. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(1):96‐103.
45.
LarnerS. Do psychological measures predict the ability of lower limb amputees to learn to use a prosthesis?Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(5):493‐498.
46.
O’NeillBFEvansJJ. Memory and executive function predict mobility rehabilitation outcome after lower-limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(13):1083‐1091.
47.
RemesLIsoahoRVahlbergTViitanenMRautavaP. Predictors for institutionalization and prosthetic ambulation after major lower extremity amputation during an eight-year follow-up. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009;21(2):129‐135.
48.
SchoppenTBoonstraAGroothoffJWde VriesJGöekenLNEismaWH. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(6):803‐811.
49.
Spruit-van EijkMvan der LindeHBuijckBGeurtsAZuidemaSKoopmansR. Predicting prosthetic use in elderly patients after major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36(1):45‐52.
50.
VogelTRPetroskiGFKruseRL. Impact of amputation level and comorbidities on functional status of nursing home residents after lower extremity amputation. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(5):1323‐1330.e1.
51.
WilliamsRMTurnerAPGreenM, et al.Changes in cognitive function from presurgery to 4 months postsurgery in individuals undergoing dysvascular amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(4):663‐669.
52.
WilliamsRMPTurnerAPPGreenMP, et al.Relationship between cognition and functional outcomes after dysvascular lower extremity amputation: a prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(9):707‐717.
53.
ShermanCWBurgioLDKowalkowskiJD.Chapter 10—Assessment of dementia family caregivers. In: LichtenbergPA, ed. Handbook of Assessment in Clinical Gerontology. 2nd ed.Academic Press; 2008:243‐271.
54.
WoodfordHJGeorgeJ. Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods. QJM: Mon J Assoc Physicians. 2007;100(8):469‐484.
55.
International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics. LEAD and COMPASS: Defining Outcome Measures and a Core Dataset for the Lower Limb Prosthetics Sector. United Nations Office for Project Services; 2021.
56.
StephanBCMMinettTMuniz-TerreraGHarrisonSLMatthewsFEBrayneC. Neuropsychological profiles of vascular disease and risk of dementia: implications for defining vascular cognitive impairment no dementia (VCI-ND). Age Ageing. 2017;46(5):755‐760.
57.
StolwykRJ. Cognitive screening following stroke: are we following best evidence-based practice in Australian clinical settings?Aust Psychol. 2016;51(5):360‐365.
58.
StyraRLarsenEDimasMA, et al.The effect of preoperative cognitive impairment and type of vascular surgery procedure on postoperative delirium with associated cost implications. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(1):201‐209.
59.
WillrichAPinzurMMcNeilMJuknelisDLaveryL. Health related quality of life, cognitive function, and depression in diabetic patients with foot ulcer or amputation. A preliminary study. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(2):128‐134.
60.
CoutureMDesrosiersJCaronCD. Cognitive appraisal and perceived benefits of dysvascular lower limb amputation: a longitudinal study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52(1):5‐11.
ResnikLBorgiaM. Reliability of outcome measures for people with lower-limb amputations: distinguishing true change from statistical error. Phys Ther. 2011;91(4):555‐565.
