A Call to Encourage Participation in the Reviewing Process: The REFEREE Acrostic

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tvina

Spellecy

Palatnik

. Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(6):1081-1083. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260

Papanas

Mikhailidis

. Alice through the looking-glass: can we improve peer review? Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2022 Mar 7:15347346221084784. doi: 10.1177/15347346221084784. Online ahead of print.

Lazarides

Georgiadis

Papanas

. Do’s and don’ts for a good reviewer of scientific papers: a beginner’s brief decalogue. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2020;19(3):227-229. doi:10.1177/1534734620924349

Derraik

JGB

Butler

ÉM

Rerkasem

. Publishing without perishing: a guide to the successful reporting of clinical data. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019;18(3):219-227. doi:10.1177/1534734619865860

Derraik

JGB

Parklak

Albert

Boonyapranai

Rerkasem

. Fundamentals of data collection in clinical studies: simple steps to avoid “garbage in, garbage out”. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2021;20(3):183-187. doi:10.1177/1534734620938234

Lazarides

Gougoudi

Papanas

. Pitfalls and misconducts in medical writing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019;18(4):350-353. doi:10.1177/1534734619870083

Lazarides

Lazaridou

Papanas

. Review article: the flagship of evidence-based medicine. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2021;20(2):83-87. doi:10.1177/1534734621995636