Wound healing is an interactive, dynamic 3-phased process. During the formation of granulation tissue, many fibroblastic cells acquire some morphological and biochemical smooth muscle features and are called myofibroblasts. Myofibroblasts participate in both granulation tissue formation and remodeling phases. Excessive scarring, which is a feature of impaired healing, is a serious health problem that may affect the patient's quality of life. The treatment costs of such lesions are high, and often, the results are unsatisfactory. To understand the wound healing process better and to promote improvement in human healing, models are needed that can predict the in vivo situation in humans. In vitro models allow the study of cell behavior in a controlled environment. Such modeling partitions and reduces to small scales behavior perceived in vivo. This article is focused on `fibroblasts.' In vitro models to study wound healing, the role of (myo)fibroblasts, and skin reconstruction in tissue replacement and promotion of wound healing are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Gilltzer R, Goebeler M. Chemokines in cutaneous wound healing . J Leukoc Biol2001 Apr;69: 513-521 .
2.
2. Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing . N Engl J Med1999 Sep;341: 738-746 .
3.
3. Clark RAF. Wound repair, overview and general considerations. In: Clark RAF, editor. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press ; 1996. p. 257-288.
4.
4. Peled ZM, Chin GS, Liu W, et al. Response to tissue injury . Clin Plast Surg2000 Oct;27: 489-500 .
5.
5. Desmoulière A, Gabbiani G. The role of myofibroblasts in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. In: Clark RAF, editor. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. New York: Plenum Press ; 1996. p. 391-423.
6.
6. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, et al. Myofibroblast and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol2002 Sep;3: 349-363 .
7.
7. Sappino AP, Schurch W, Gabbiani G. Differentiation repertoire of fibroblastic cells: expression of cytoskeletal proteins as marker of phenotypic modulations . Lab Invest1990;63: 144-161 .
8.
8. Schürch W, Seemayer TA, Gabbiani G. Myofibroblast. In: Sternberg SS, editor. Histology for pathologists. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven ; 1997. p. 129-165.
9.
9. Desmoulière A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 induces α-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts . J Cell Biol1993;122: 103-111 .
10.
10. Rubbia-Brandt L, Sappino AP, Gabbiani G. Locally applied GMCSF induces the accumulation of α-smooth muscle actin containing myofibroblasts . Virch Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol1991;60: 73-82 .
11.
11. Desmoulière A, Rubbia-Brandt L, Abdiu A, et al. α-smooth muscle actin is expressed in a subpopulation of cultured and cloned fibroblasts and is modulated by γ-interferon . Exp Cell Res1992;201: 64-73 .
12.
12. Desmoulière A, Rubbia-Brandt L, Grau D, et al. Heparin induces α-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts . Lab Invest1992;67: 716-726 .
13.
13. Serini G, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Ropraz P, et al. The fibronectin domain ED-A is crucial for myofibroblastic phenotype induction by transforming growth factor-β1 . J Cell Biol1998 Aug;142: 873-881 .
14.
14. Eckes B, Aumailley M, Krieg T. Collagens and the reestablishment of dermal integrity. In: Clark RAF, editor. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. New York: Plenum Press ; 1996. p. 493-512.
15.
15. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, et al. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling . Mol Cell Biol2002;3: 349-363 .
16.
16. Desmoulière A, Redard M, Darby I, Gabbiani G. Apoptosis mediates the decrease in cellularity during the transition between granulation tissue and scar . Am J Pathol1995;146: 56-66 .
17.
17. Ferguson MW, Whitby DJ, Shah M, et al. Scar formation: the spectral nature of fetal and adult wound repair . Plast Reconstr Surg1996;97: 854-860 .
18.
18. Estes JM, Vande Berg JS, Adzick NS, et al. Phenotypic and functional features of myofibroblasts in sheep fetal wounds . Differentiation1994;56: 173-181 .
19.
19. Moulin V, Plamondon M. Differential expression of collagen integrin receptor on fetal vs. adult skin fibroblasts: implication in wound contraction during healing . Br J Dermatol2002;147: 886-892 .
20.
20. White P, Thomas DW, Fong S, et al. Deletion of the homeobox gene PRX-2 affects fetal but not adult fibroblast wound healing responses . J Invest Dermatol2003;120: 135-144 .
21.
21. Liu W, Cao Y, Longaker MT. Gene therapy of scarring: a lesson learned from fetal scarless wound healing . Yonsei Med J2001;42: 634-645 .
22.
22. Linares HA. Pathophysiology of the burn scar. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. 1st ed. London: Saunders ; 1996. p. 383-397.
23.
23. Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, et al. International clinical recommendations on scar management . Plast Reconst Surg2002;110: 560-571 .
24.
24. Costa AMA, Desmoulière A. Mechanisms and factors involved in development of hypertrophic scars . Eur J Plast Surg1998;21: 19-23 .
25.
25. Ehrlich HP, Desmoulière A, Diegelman RF, et al. Morphological and immunohistochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar . Am J Pathol1994;145: 105-113 .
26.
26. Rheinwald JG, Green H. Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells . Cell1975;6: 331-343 .
27.
27. Freshney RI. Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss ; 1994. p. 127-147.
28.
28. Ehrman RL, Gey GO. The growth of cells on a transparent gel of reconstituted rat tail collagen . J Natl Acad Sci1956;16: 1375 .
29.
29. Kleinman HK, Rohrbach DH, Terranova VP, et al. Collagenous matrices as determinants of cell function. In: Furthmayr H, editor. Immunochemistry of extracellular matrix. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press ; 1982. p. 151-174.
30.
30. Elsdale T, Bard J. Collagen substrata for studies on cell behaviour . J Cell Biol1972 Sep;54: 626-637 .
31.
31. Bell E, Sher S, Hull B, et al. The reconstitution of a living skin . J Invest Dermatol1983;81: 2s-10s .
32.
32. Bell E, Ivarsson B, Merrill C. Production of tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potencial in vitro . Proc Natl Acad Sci1979 Mar;76: 1274-1278 .
33.
33. Coulomb B, Dubertret L, Bell E, Touraine R. The contractility of fibroblasts in a collagen lattice is reduced by corticosteroids . J Invest Dermatol1984;82: 341-344 .
34.
34. Friedl P, Brocker EB. The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix . Cell Mol Life Sci2000;57: 41-64 .
35.
35. Asselineau D, Bell E. Prolylhydroxylase activation in IMR 90 fibroblasts: state of differentiation rather than population doubling level determines requirements for enzyme activation . Mech Ageing Dev1984;25: 257-266 .
36.
36. Nusgens B, Merrill C, Lapière C, Bell E. Collagen biosynthesis by cells in a tissue equivalent matrix in vitro . Collagen Rel Res1984;4: 351-364 .
37.
37. Dubertret L, Brunner-Ferber F, Misiti J, et al. Activities of human acidic growth factor in an in vitro dermal equivalent model . J Invest Dermatol1991;97: 793-798 .
38.
38. Coulomb B, Lebreton C, Mathieu N, Morlière P. UVA-induced oxidative damage in fibroblasts cultured in a three dimensional collagen matrix . Exp Dermatol1996;5: 161-167 .
39.
39. Coulomb B, Dubertret L, Bell E, et al. Endogenous peroxidases in normal human dermis: a marker of fibroblast differentiation . J Invest Dermatol1983;81: 75-78 .
40.
40. Vozenin MC, Lefaix JL, Ridi R, et al. The myofibroblast markers α-SM actin and β-actin are differentially expressed in 2 and 3-D culture models of fibrotic and normal skin . Cytotechnology1998;26: 29-38 .
41.
41. Chaussain-Miller C, Godeau G, Lebreton-DeCoster C, et al. Validation of a morphometric method for evaluating fibroblast numbers in normal and pathological tissues . Exp Dermatol2003;12: 1-9 .
42.
42. Bell E, Ehrlich P, Buttle DJ, et al. Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent of full-thickness . Science1981;221: 1052-1054 .
43.
43. Coulomb B, Saiag Ph, Bell E, et al. A new method for studying epidermalization in vitro . Br J Dermatol1986;114: 91-101 .
44.
44. Coulomb B, Lebreton C, Dubertret L. Influence of human dermal fibroblasts on epidermalization . J Invest Dermatol1989;92: 122-125 .
45.
45. Saiag P, Coulomb B, Lebreton C, et al. Psoriatic fibroblasts induce hyperproliferation of normal keratinocytes in a skin equivalent model in vitro . Science1985;230: 669-672 .
46.
46. Sanquer S, Coulomb B, Lebreton C, Dubertret L. Human dermal fibroblasts modulate the effects of retinoids on epidermal growth . J Invest Dermatol1990;95: 700-704 .
47.
47. Werner S, Smola H, Liao X, et al. The function of KGF in morphogenesis of epithelium and reepithelisation of wounds . Science1994;266: 819-822 .
48.
48. Mochitake K, Pawelek P, Grinnell F. Stress-relaxation of contracted collagen gels: disruption of actin filament bundles, release of cell surface fibronectin, and down regulation of DNA and protein synthesis . Exp Cell Res1991;193: 198-207 .
49.
49. Grinnell F. Signal transduction pathways active during fibroblast contraction of collagen matrices. In: Desmoulière A, Tuchwebwer B, editors. Tissue repair and fibrosis: the role of the myofibroblast. Berlin: Springer ; 1999. p. 61-73.
50.
50. Le Panse R, Bouchard B, Lebreton C, Coulomb B. Modulation of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) mRNA expression in human dermal fibroblasts grown in monolayer or within a collagen matrix . Exp Dermatol1996;5: 108-114 .
51.
51. Schaefer T, Roux M, Stuhlsatz, Het al. Glycosaminoglycans modulate cell-matrix interactions of human fibroblasts endothelial cells in vitro . J Cell Sci1996;109: 479-488 .
52.
52. Besseau L, Coulomb B, Lebreton-Decoster C, Giraud-Guille MM. Production of ordered collagen matrices for three-dimensional cell culture . Biomaterials2002;23: 27-36 .
53.
53. Contard P, Jacobs L, Perlish JS, Fleischmajer R. Collagen fibrilligenesis in a three-dimensional fibroblasts cell culture system . Cell Tissues Res1993;273: 571-575 .
54.
54. Cukiernam E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, et al. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension . Science2001 Nov;294: 1708-1712 .
55.
55. Falanga V, Isaacs C, Paquette D, et al. Wounding of bioengineered skin: cellular and molecular aspects after injury . J Invest Dermatol2002;119: 653-660 .
56.
56. Turchi L, Chassot A, Rezzonico R, et al. Dynamic characterization of the molecular events during in vitro epidermal wound healing . J Invest Dermatol2002;119: 56-63 .
57.
57. Bessou-Touya S, Picardo M, Maresca V, et al. Chimeric human skin reconstructs to study the role of melanocytes and keratinocytes in pigmentation and photoprotection . J Invest Dermatol1998;111: 1103-1108 .
58.
58. Régnier M, Staquet MJ, Schmitt D, Schmidt R. Integration of Langerhans cells into a pigmented reconstructed human epidermis . J Invest Dermatol1997;109: 510-512 .
59.
59. Gallico GG, O'Connor NE, Compton CC, et al. Permanent coverage of large burn wounds with autologous cultured human epithelium . N Engl J Med1984;311: 448-451 .
60.
60. Cuono CB, Langdon R, Birchall N, et al. Composite autologousallogenic skin replacement: development and clinical application . Plast Reconst Surg1987;80: 626-635 .
61.
61. Compton CC, Gill JF, Bradford DA, et al. Skin regenerated from cultured epithelial autografts on full-thickness burn wounds from 6 days to5 years after grafting . Lab Invest1989;60: 600-612 .
62.
62. Neveux Y, Rives JM, Lebreton Ch, et al. Clinical interest of cutaneous models reproduced in vitro for severe burn treatment: histopathologic and ultrastructural study . Cell Biol Toxicol1995;11: 173-178 .
63.
63. Coulomb B, Dubertret L. In vitro reconstructed skin for grafting in human. In: Lapière C, Krieg T, editors. Connective tissue diseases of the skin. New York: Marcel Dekker ; 1993. p. 349-360.
64.
64. Coulomb B, Friteau L, Baruch J, et al. Advantage of the presence of living dermal fibroblasts within in vitro reconstructed skin for grafting in humans . Plast Reconst Surg1998;101: 1891-1903 .
65.
65. Lamme E, van Leeuwen R, Jonker A, et al. Living skin substitutes: survival and function of fibroblasts seeded in a dermal substitute in experimental wounds . J Invest Dermatol1998;111: 989-995 .
66.
66. Velazquez OC, Snyder R, Liu Z, et al. Fibroblast-dependent differentiation of human microvascular endothelial cells into capillary-like 3-dimensional networks . FASEB J2002 Aug;16: 1316-1318 .
67.
67. Burke JF, Yannas IV, Quinby WC, et al. Successful use of a physiologically acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive burn injury . Ann Surg1981;194: 413-428 .
68.
68. Boyce S, Kagan R, Meyer N, et al. Cultured skin substitutes combined with Integra artificial skin to replace native skin autograft and allograft for the closure of excised full-thickness burns . J Burn Care Rehabil1999;20: 453-461 .
69.
69. Leigh IM, Purkis PE, Navsaria HA, Phillips TJ. Treatment of chronic venous ulcers with sheets of cultured allogenic keratinocytes . Br J Dermatol1987;117: 591-597 .
70.
70. Eaglstein WH, Alvarez OM, Auletta M, et al. Acute excisional wounds treated with a tissue-engineered skin (Apligraf) . Dermatol Surg1999;25: 195-201 .
71.
71. Falanga V, Margollis D, Alvarez O, et al. Rapid healing of venous ulcers and lack of clinical rejection with an allogeneic cultured human skin equivalent . Arch Dermatol1998;134: 293-299 .
72.
72. Hull BE, Finley RK, Miller SF. Coverage of full-thickness burns with bilayered skin equivalents: a preliminary clinical trial . Surgery1990;107: 496-501 .
73.
73. Chang HY, Chi JT, Dudoit S, et al. Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts . Proc Natl Acad Sci2002;99: 12877-12882 .
74.
74. Komuro T. Re-evaluation of fibroblasts and fibroblast-like cells . Anat Embryol1990;182: 103-112 .
75.
75. Chaussain-Miller C, Septier D, Bonnefoix N, et al. Human dermal and gingival fibroblasts in a three-dimensional culture: a comparative study on matrix remodeling . Clin Oral Invest2002;6(1): 39-50 .
76.
76. Sorrell JM, Carrino DA, Baber MA, et al. A monoclonal antibody recognizes a glycosaminoglycan epitope in both dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans of human skin . Histochem J1999;31: 549-558 .
77.
77. Bucala R, Spiegel LA, Chesney L, et al. Circulating fibrocytes define a new leukocyte subpopulation that mediates tissue repair . Mol Med1994;1: 71-81 .
78.
78. Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues . Science1997;276: 71-74 .
79.
79. Abe R, Donnelly SC, Peng T, et al. Peripheral bood fibrocytes: differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites . J Immunol2001;166: 7556-7562 .
80.
80. Yang L, Scott PG, Giuffre J, et al. Peripheral blood fibrocytes from burn patients: identification and quantification of fibrocytes in adherent cells cultured from peripheral blood mononuclear cells . Lab Invest2002;82: 1183-1192 .
81.
81. Boyer B, Valles AM, Edme N. Induction and regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions . Biochem Pharmacol2000;60: 1091-1099 .
82.
82. Strutz F, Okada H, Lo CW, et al. Identification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1 . J Cell Biol1995;130: 393-405 .
83.
83. Ng YY, Huang TP, Yang WC, et al. Tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis in 5/6 nephrectomized rats . Kidney Int1998 Sep;54: 864-876 .
84.
84. Iwano M, Plieth D, Danoff T, et al. Evidence that fibroblast derive from epithelium during tissue fibrosis . J Clin Invest2002 Aug;110: 341-350 .
