Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Models in Lower Extremity Wounds

Abstract

Consider a study in which 2 new treatments are being compared with a control group. One way to compare outcomes would simply be to compare the 2 treatments with the control and the 2 treatments against each using 3 Student t tests (t test). If we were to compare 4 treatment groups, then we would need to use 6 t tests. The difficulty with using multiple t tests is that as the number of groups increases, so will the likelihood of finding a difference between any pair of groups simply by change when no real difference exists by definition a Type I error. If we were to perform 3 separate t tests each at α = .05, the experimental error rate increases to .14. As the number of multiple t tests increases, the experiment-wise error rate increases rather rapidly. The solution to the experimental error rate problem is to use analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods. Three basic ANOVA designs are reviewed that give hypothetical examples drawn from the literature to illustrate single-factor ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA, and randomized block ANOVA. `No frills' SPSS or SAS code for each of these designs and examples used are available from the author on request.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Stess RM, Jensen SR, and Mirmiran R. The role of dynamic plantar pressures in diabetic foot ulcers . Diabetes Care 1997;20: 855-858 .

2. Rome K, Campbell R, Flint A, et al. Heel pad thickness—a contributing factor associated with plantar heel pain in young adults . Foot Ankle Int 2002;23: 142-147 .

3. Janda DH, Bir Cynthia, Kedroske B. A comparison of standard vs. breakaway bases: an analysis of a preventative intervention for softball and baseball foot and ankle injuries . Foot Ankle Int 2001;22: 810-816 .

4. Blackwell B, Aldridge R, Jacob S. A comparison of plantar pressure in patients with diabetic foot ulcers using different hosiery . International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 2002;1(3): 174-178 .

5. Grampp J, Willson J, Kernozek T. The plantar loading variations to uphill and downhill gradients during treadmill walking . Foot Ankle Int 2000;21: 227-231 .

6. Hartsell HD, Brand RA, Saltzman CL. Total contact casting: its effect on contralateral plantar foot pressure . Foot Ankle Int 2002;23: 330-334 .

7. Croteau GA, Guffey SE, Flanagan ME, et al. The effect of local exhaust ventilation controls on dust exposures during concrete cutting and grinding activities . American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 2002;63: 458-467 .

8. Storm H, Thomsen C, Pedersen E, et al. Comparison of a carbohydrate-rich diet and diets rich in stearic or palmitic acid in NIDDM patients . Diabetes Care 1997;20: 1807-1813 .