Mathematical Methods Relevant to the Study of Wound Healing

Abstract

Over recent years there has been a growing interest in the application of mathematical techniques and methods to improve understanding of clinical problems. Mathematical methods permit accurate description and quantification of observations and processes. Wound healing is a clinical problem that needs support in order to improve management and understanding of the mechanisms that may disarrange healing processes. This article attempts to provide an overview of currently available methods that have a direct relevance to the management of lower extremity wounds. Mathematics can provide valuable assistance and insight to clinical understanding, but only if applied correctly. It is hoped that examples of good practice will promote the utilization of this versatile tool.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Pettet G, Byrne H, Mcelwain D, et al. A model of wound-healing angiogenesis in soft tissue. Math Biosci 1996;136:35-63.

2. Olsen L, Sherratt J, Maini P. A mathematical model for fibroproliferative wound healing disorders. Bull Math Biol 1996;58:787-808.

3. Dallon J, Sherratt J, Maini P. Modeling the effects of transforming growth factor-beta on extracellular matrix alignment in dermal wound repair. Wound Repair Regeneration 2001;9:278-286.

4. Dale P, Sherratt J, Maini P. A mathematical model for collagen fibre formation during foetal and adult dermal wound healing. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996;263:653-660.

5. Dale P, Sherratt J, Maini P. Role of fibroblast migration in collagen fiber formation during foetal and adult dermal wound healing. Bull Math Biol 1997;59:1077-1100.

6. Adam J. A simplified model of wound healing (with particular reference to the critical size defect). Math Comput Model 1999; 30:23-32.

7. Arnold J. A simplified model of wound healing III—the critical size defect in three dimensions. Math Computer Modelling 2001;34:385-392.

8. Digges K, Bedewi P, Bahouth G, et al. Determination and modeling of ankle injury causation. Presented at: International Conference on Pelvic and Lower Extremity Injuries; 1995; Washington, DC.

9. Mani R. Transcutaneous measurements of oxygen tension in venous ulcer disease. Vasc Med Rev 1995;6:121-131.

10.

10. Moffatt C. Compression bandaging: the state of the art. J Wound Care 1992;1:45-50.

11.

11. Kunimoto B. Management and prevention of venous leg ulcers: a literature-guided approach. OstomyWound Manage 2001;47: 36-49.

12.

12. Skalak T, Schmid-Schönbein G. Viscoelastic properties of miscrovessels in rat spinotrapezius muscle. ASME J Biomech Eng 1986;108:193-200.

13.

13. Fung Y. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissue. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.

14.

14. Chomard D, Habault P, Eveno D, et al. Criteria predictive of limb viability at 1 year in patients with chronic severe ischemia-TcPO2 and demographic parameters. Angiology 2000;51:765-776.

15.

15. Skene A, Smith J, Dore C, et al. Venous leg ulcers: a prognostic index to predict time to healing. BMJ 1992;305:1119-1121.

16.

16. Lossius K, Eriksen M, Walloe L. Fluctuations in blood-flow to acral skin in humans—connection with heart-rate and blood pressure variability. J Physiol 1993;460:641-655.