Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-8
An Application of Behavioral Activation Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder in the Context of Complicated Grief,Low Social-Economic Status,and Ethnic Minority Status
Behavioral activation (BA) has been shown to be an effective treatment for depression, especially for severe and/or chronic depression; however, there is little empirical guidance on how BA can be effectively utilized to treat chronic Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in the context of complicated grief, low socioeconomic status, and ethnic minority status. This case study focuses on the treatment of Ms. X, a 51-year-old African American woman with chronic depression that was exacerbated by complicated grief. This case describes an effective course of a standard BA protocol for MDD in the context of complicated grief, low socioeconomic status, and ethnic minority status and illustrates how a BA protocol can be applied while incorporating important cultural considerations.
AddisM. E.MartellC. R. (2004). Overcoming depression one step at a time: The new behavioral activation approach to getting your life back. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
4.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
5.
BernalG.Scharron-del-RioM. R. (2001). Are empirically supported treatments valid for ethnic minorities? Toward an alternative approach for treatment research. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 74, 328-342.
6.
BleibergK.MarkowitzJ. C. (2008). Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression. In BarlowD. H. (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual (4th ed., pp. 306-327). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
BoelenP. A.van den BoutJ. (2008). Complicated grief and uncomplicated grief are distinguishable constructs. Psychiatric Research, 157, 311-314.
8.
Boyd-FranklinN. (2003). Black families in therapy: Understanding the African American experience. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
CuijpersP.van StratenA.WarmerdamL. (2007). Behavioral activation treatments of depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 318-326.
10.
DillenL.ContainedJ. R. J.Verhofstadt-DeneveL. (2008). Are normal and complicated grief different constructs? A confirmatory factor analytic test. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15, 386-395.
11.
DimidjianS.MartellC. R.AddisM. E.Herman-DunnR. (2008). Behavioral Activation for depression. In BarlowD. H. (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual (4th ed., pp 353-393). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
FersterC. B. (1973). A functional analysis of depression. American Psychologist, 281, 857-870.
13.
FoaE. B.KeaneT. M.FriedmanM. J.CohenJ. A. (2009). Effective treatments for PTSD: Practice guidelines from the international society for traumatic stress studies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
HammenC.AdrianC.GordonD.BurgeD.JaenickeC.HirotoD. (1987). Children of depressed mothers: Maternal strain and symptom predictors of dysfunction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 190-198.
15.
HopkoD. R.LejuezC. W.RuggieroK. J.EifertG. H. (2003). Contemporary behavioral activation treatments for depression: Procedures, principles, and progress. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 699-717.
HylerS. E.RiederR. O.WilliamsJ. B. W.SpitzerR. L.HendlerJ.LyonsM. (1988). The Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire: Development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Disorders, 2, 229-237.
18.
JacobsonN. S.MartellC. R.DimidjianS. (2001). Behavioral activation treatment for depression: Returning to contextual roots. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 255-270.
19.
KaplanD. M.SmithT.CoonsJ. (1995). A validity study of the subjective unit of discomfort (SUD) score. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 27, 195-199.
20.
KazdinA. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146-159.
21.
KendallP. C.Flannery-SchroederE. C.FordJ. D. (1999). Therapy outcome research methods. In KendallP. C.ButcherJ. N.HolmbeckG. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (2nd ed., pp. 330-363). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
KerstingA.BrahlerE.GlaesmerH.WagnerB. (2011). Prevalence of complicated grief in a representative population-based sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 131, 339-343.
23.
KerstingA.KrokerK.HorstmannJ.OhrmannP.BauneB. T.AroltV.SuslowT. (2009). Complicated grief in patients with unipolar depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118, 201-204.
24.
LevyL. B.O’HaraM. W. (2010). Psychotherapeutic interventions for depressed, low-income women: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 934-950.
25.
LewinsohnP. M. (1974). A behavioral approach to depression. In FriedmanR. M.KatzM. M. (Eds.), The psychology of depression: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 157-187). New York, NY: Wiley.
26.
LichtenthalW. G.CruessD. G.PrigersonH. G. (2004). A case for establishing complicated grief as a distinct mental disorder in DSM-V. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 637-662.
27.
MartellC. R.AddisM. E.JacobsonN. S. (2001). Depression in context: Strategies for guided action. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
28.
MazzucchelliT. G.KaneR. T.ReesC. S. (2010). Behavioral activation interventions for well-being: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 105-121.
29.
MontgomeryS. A.AsbergM. (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382-389.
30.
Nagayama HallG. C. (2001). Psychotherapy research with ethnic minorities: Empirical, ethical, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 502-510.
31.
PrigersonH. G.HorowitizM. J.JacobsS. C.ParkesC. M.AslanM.GoodkinK.. . . MaciejewskiP. K. (2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-II. PLoS Medicine, 6, 1-12.
32.
PrigersonH. G.JacobsS. C. (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: A rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW.SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 613-645). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
PrigersonH. G.VanderwerkerL. C.MaciejewskiP. K. (2008). A case for inclusion of prolonged grief disorder in DSM-V. In StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW.SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 165-186). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
RamneroJ.TornekeN. (2008). The ABC’s of human behavior. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
35.
SheehanD. V.LecrubierY.SheehanK. H. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(Suppl. 20), 22-33; quiz 34-57.
36.
SimonN. M.ShearK. M.ThompsonE. H.ZaltaA. K.PerlmanC.. . . SilowashR. (2007). The prevalence and correlates of psychiatric comorbidity in individuals with complicated grief. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48, 395-399.
37.
SungS. C.DrymanM. T.MarksE.ShearM. K.GhesquiereA.FavaM.SimonN. M. (2011). Complicated grief among individuals with major depression: Prevalence, comorbidity, and associated features. Journal of Affective Disorders, 134, 453-458.
38.
TannerB. A. (2012). Validity of global physical and emotional SUDS. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 31-34.
39.
WordenJ. W. (2009). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner. New York, NY: Springer.
