We report the case of an 11-year-old boy with autism who displayed aggressive behavior and required aggression-contingent physical restraint (protective holding) to protect peers and teachers from injury. During a baseline phase, teachers implemented the boy’s behavior support plan and applied protective holding according to a behavior-contingent release (BCR) criterion in which they maintained physical contact with him until he was “calm” for a minimum of 30 consecutive seconds. In the intervention phase, baseline procedures remained in effect, but the teachers terminated protective holding with the boy according to a fixed-time release (FTR) criterion that was independent of his behavior during protective holding and faded (decreased) systematically over time. In contrast to BCR, FTR fading was associated with less exposure to and fewer applications of protective holding. Post-intervention and follow-up results revealed that protective holding was no longer required. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings.
American Psychological Association. (1994). Guidelines on effective treatment for persons with mental retardation and developmental disabilities: A resolution by APA division 33. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/divisions/div33/effectivetreatment.html
2.
Association of Professional Behavior Analysts. (2010). Position statement on the use of restraint and seclusion as interventions for dangerous and destructive behaviors: Supporting research and practice guidelines. Retrieved from : http://www.apbahome.net/Restraint_Seclusion%20.pdf
3.
BijouS. W.PetersonR. F.AultM. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175-191.
4.
CipaniE.SchockK. M. (2011). Functional behavioral assessment, diagnosis, and treatment: A complete system for education and mental health settings. New York, NY: Springer.
5.
CunninghamJ.McDonnellA.EastonS.SturmeyP. (2003). Social validation data on three methods of physical restraint: Views of consumers, staff, and students. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 307-316.
6.
DiGennaro ReedF.CoddingR. S. (2011). Intervention integrity assessment. In LuiselliJ. K. (Ed.), Teaching and behavior support for children and adults with autism spectrum disorder: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 38-47). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
DonatD. C. (1998). Impact of a mandatory behavioral consultation on seclusion/restraint utilization in a psychiatric hospital. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 29, 13-19.
8.
FavellJ. E.McGimseyJ. F.JonesM. L. (1978). The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 225-241.
HarrisJ. (1996). Physical restraint procedures for managing challenging behaviors presented by mentally retarded adults and children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 99-134.
11.
HillJ.SpreatS. (1987). Staff injury rates associated with the implementation of contingent restraint. Mental Retardation, 25, 141-145.
12.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
KleinmannA. E.LuiselliJ. K.DiGennaroF. D.PaceG. M.LangoneS. R.CochranC. (2009). Systems-level assessment of interobserver agreement (IOA) for implementation of protective holding (therapeutic restraint) in a behavioral healthcare setting. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21, 473-483.
14.
LennoxD.GerenM.RourkeD. (2011). Emergency physical restraint: Considerations for staff training and supervision. In LuiselliJ. K. (Ed.), The handbook of high-risk challenging behaviors in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 271-292). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
15.
LermanD. C.IwataB. A.ShoreB. A.DeLeonI. G. (1997). Effects of intermittent punishment on self-injurious behavior: An evaluation of schedule thinning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 187-201.
16.
LuiselliJ. K. (2008). Effects of fixed-time release (FTR) fading on implementation of physical restraint. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1-6.
17.
LuiselliJ. K. (2009). Physical restraint of people with intellectual disability: A review of implementation reduction and elimination procedures. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 126-134.
18.
LuiselliJ. K. (2011). Therapeutic implementation of physical restraint. In LuiselliJ. K. (Ed.), Handbook of high-risk challenging behavior s in people with intellectual and developmental disability (pp. 243-256). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
19.
LuiselliJ. K.DunnE. K.PaceG. M. (2005). Antecedent assessment and intervention to reduce physical restraint (protective holding) of children and adolescents with acquired brain injury. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 51-65.
20.
LuiselliJ. K.KaneA.TremlT.YoungN. (2000). Behavioral intervention to reduce physical restraint of adolescents with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 15, 317-330.
21.
LuiselliJ. K.PaceG. M.DunnE. K. (2006). Effects of behavior-contingent and fixed-time release contingencies on frequency and duration of therapeutic restraint. Behavior Modification, 30, 442-455.
22.
LuiselliJ. K.TremlT.KaneA.YoungN. (2004). Physical restraint intervention: Case report of an implementation-reduction strategy and long term outcome. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 7, 91-96.
23.
MageeS. K.EllisJ. (1988). The detrimental effects of physical restraint as a consequence for inappropriate classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 501-504.
24.
ReedD. D.DiGennaro ReedF. D.LuiselliJ. K. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of crisis intervention and developmental disabilities. New York, NY: Springer.
25.
ReedD. D.LuiselliJ. K.MillerJ. R.KaplanB. A. (2013). Therapeutic restraint and protective holding. In Reed.D. D.DiGennaro ReedF.LuiselliJ. K. (Eds.), Handbook of crisis intervention and developmental disabilities (pp. 107-120). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
RyanJ. B.RobbinsK.PetersonR. L.RozalskiM. (2009). Review of state policies concerning use of physical restraint procedures in schools. Education & Treatment of Children, 32, 487-504.
27.
SandersK. (2009). The effects of an action plan, staff training, management support, and monitoring on restraint use and costs of work related injuries. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 216-220.
28.
SinghN. N.SinghS. D.DavisC. M.LathamL. L.AyersJ. G. (1999). Reconsidering the use of seclusion and restraints in inpatient child and adult psychiatry. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 243-253.
29.
SpreatS.LipinskiD.HillJ.HalpinM. E. (1986). Safety indices associated with the use of contingent restraint procedures. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 475-481.
30.
SturmeyP.McGlynnA. P. (2003). Restraint reduction. In AllenD. (Ed.), Ethical approaches to physical interventions: Responding to challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities (pp. 203-218). Plymouth, UK: BILD Publications.
31.
WilliamsD. E. (2009). Restraint safety: An analysis of injuries related to restraint of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 135-139.
32.
WilliamsD. E. (2010). Reducing and eliminating restraint of people with developmental disabilities and severe behavior disorders: An overview of recent research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1142-1148.
