Reliability and Validity of the Writing Essential Skill Screener

Abstract

Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, item analysis, and construct and concurrent criterion-related validity of the Writing Essential Skill Screener — Preschool Version (WESS-P) were studied using four independent samples of boys and girls, ages 4 through 5. Median item difficulty was.65 and median item discrimination was.84 for the standardization sample. A decision reliability study resulted in accurate decisions being made for 92% of a sample of children with and without pre-writing skill deficiencies. A one-factor principal component solution was derived. Internal consistency was.95 and.93, whereas 30-day test-retest reliability was.91. The WESS-P yielded concurrent cirterion-related validity coefficients of.85 with the Test of Early Written Language (TEWL), and.82 with the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI), and accurately identified 92% of participants in a diagnostic validity study. The WESS-P displayed a high degree of reliability and validity for a brief pre-writing skills screener. Implications for policy and practice were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.), New York: Macmillan

Beery, K. E. (1989). Manual for the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI). Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press

Benneli, C. , & Yongue, B. (1995). Supporting young children's motor skill development. Children Educatíon, 71, 217–220.

Erford, B. T. , Vitali, G. , Haas, R. , & Boykin, R. R. (1995). Manual for the Writing Essential Skills Screener (ESS). East Aurora, N.Y.: Slosson

Erlbaum, R. (1987). As the twig is bent: Lasting effects of preschool programs. Consortium for Longitudinal Studies.

Goodgold, S. A. (1983). Handwiting movement quality in prekindergarten children. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 64, 471–475.

Hresko, W. (1989). Manual for the Test of Early Written Language (TEWL). Austin, Tx.: Pro-Ed

Larson, S. L. , & Vitali, G. J. (1988). Manual for the Kindergarten Readiness Test. East Aurora, N.Y.: Slosson

Meisels, S.J. , & Atlins-Burnett, S. (1994). Developmental screening in early childhood: A guide. (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: NAEYC

10.

Meisels, S. J. , & Shonkoff, J. (Eds.) (1990). The handbook of early intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

11.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (1988, March). NAEYC position statement on standardized testing of young children 3 through 8 years of age. Young Children. 42–47.

12.

Roth, M. , McCaul, E. , & Barnes, K. (1993). Who becomes an “at-risk’ student? The predictive value of a kindergarten screening battery. Exceptional Children, 59 (4), 348–358.

13.

Schweinhart, L. J. , Barnes, H. , & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope preschool study through age 7. Ypsilante, MI: High/Scope Press

14.

Schweinhart, L. J. , & Weikart, D. P. (1986). Early childhood development programs: A public investment opportunity. Educational Leadership, 44 (3), 4–12.

15.

Sulzby, E. (1993). I can write! Encouraging emergent writers. Scholastic Pre-K Today, January, 30–33.

16.

Tabachnik, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1983). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper and Row

17.

Thompson, B. (1989). Prerotation and postrotation eigenvalues shouldn't be confused: A reminder. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22 (3), 114–116.

Reliability and Validity of the Writing Essential Skill Screener — Preschool Version (WESS-P)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References