Teacher Judgment of Student Mastery of Math Skills

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe teachers' judgments about their students' mastery of a set of math skills. Information on each student's actual skill mastery based on curriculum-based measurement (CBM) was provided to nine special and general education elementary teachers. Teachers were then asked to identify the specific math skills their students had mastered. The skills rated as mastered by the teachers were compared to the students' actual mastery on the CBM tests. Results indicated most teachers were not accurate at judging mastery of math skills despite having specific information about their students' achievement. Results are discussed in terms of how teachers may use ongoing systematic achievement data to improve their judgments of student progress.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bentz, J. , & Fuchs, L.S. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement and instructional planning. The Learning Consultant Journal, 13, 34–37.

Borg, W.R. , & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th Ed). New York: Longman.

Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 141–146.

Fuchs, L.S. , & Fuchs, D. (1984). Criterion-referenced assessment without measurement: How accurate for special education. Remedial and Special Education, 5(4), 29–32.

Fuchs, L.S. , Fuchs, D. , Hamlett , & Allinder, R.M. (1989). The reliability and validity of skills analysis within curriculum-based measurement, Diagnostique, 14, 203–221.

Fuchs, L.S. , Fuchs, D. , Hamlett, C.L. , & Stecker, P.M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6–22.

Fuchs, L.S. , Fuchs, D. , Hamlett, C.L. , & Stecker, P.M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematic operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617–641.

Gerber, M.M. , & Semmel, M.I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137–148.

Hoge, R.D. , & Butcher, R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 777–781.

10.

Hoge, R.D. , & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297–313.

11.

Hoge, R.D. , & Cudmore, L. (1986). The use of teacher judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 181–196.

12.

Lovitt, T.C. , & Fantasia, K. (1985). An analysis of a two-year precision teaching project with mildly handicapped children. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 9, 329–340.

13.

Luebke, J. , Epstein, M.H. , & Cullinan, D. (1989). Comparison of teacher-rated achievement levels of behaviorally disordered, learning disabled, and nonhandicapped adolescents. Behavioral Disorders, 15, 1–8.

14.

Marston, D.B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M.R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.

15.

Salmon-Cox, L. (1981). Teachers and standardized achievement tests: What's really happening? Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 631–634.

16.

Stiggins, R.J. (1988). Make sure your teachers understand student assessment. The Executive Educator, 24–26, 30.

17.

Wright, D. , & Wiese, M. (1988). Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 10–14.