EavesR.C., VanceH.R., MannL., & Parker-BohannonA. (in press). Cognition and academic achievement: The relationship of the Cognitive Levels Test, the Key-Math Revised and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Psychology in the Schools.
4.
GoldmanR.M., FristoeM., & WoodcockR.N. (1976). Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock Auditory Skills Test Battery.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
5.
HallM., RibovichJ.K., & RamigC.J. (1979). Reading and the elementary school child.New York: Van Nostrand.
6.
KaufmanA.S., & KaufmanN.L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7.
National Forum Foundation. (no date-a). Correlations between the WRMT–R Form G and the K–ABC (Research Report No. WRMT–R–2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
8.
National Forum Foundation. (no date-b). Correlations between the WRMT–R Form G and the WISC–R (Research Report No. WRMT–R–1). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9.
SaltstoneR., TaylerS.M., & FraboniM. (1989). A note on the Word Identification subtest of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised: Different classification consequences of Forms G and H. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 7, 343–345.
10.
SalviaJ., & YsseldykeJ.E. (1988). Assessment in special and remedial education (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.