AbrahamW. (1958). Common sense about gifted children.New York: Harper & Brothers.
2.
BernalE.M. (1978). The identification of gifted Chicano children. In BaldwinA.Y., GearG.H., & LucitoL.J. (Eds.), Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers (pp. 14–17). Res-ton, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
3.
BruchC.B. (1971). Modification of procedures for identification of the disadvantaged gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 267–272.
4.
ClarizioH.F. (1982). Piagetian assessment measures revisited: Issues and applications. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 421–430.
5.
CurryJ.A., & EpleyT.M. (1980). A model for establishing continuity in identification of the gifted and talented. In Educating the preschool/primary gifted and talented (pp. 21–24). Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.
6.
DeAvilaE.A., & HavassyB.E. (1975). Piagetian alternative to IQ: Mexican-American study. In HobbsN. (Ed.), Issues in the classification of exceptional children (pp. 246–265). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
FrasierM.M. (1979). Rethinking the issues regarding the culturally disadvantaged gifted. Exceptional Children, 46, 539–542.
8.
GallagherJ.J. (1966). Research summary on gifted child education.State of Illinois: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
9.
GregoryD.A., StarnesW.T., JohnsonST., OttS., & BlaylockA. (in press). Evaluation report: Implementation of a diagnostic battery.Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools.
10.
GrossS., & FrechtlingJ. (1981). Screening for the gifted and talented program: An examination of the process and procedures.Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools.
11.
GurcsikB. (1981). Justifying your program with a diagnostic-prescriptive approach or SOI—It works for us. G/C/T, September/October, 12–13.
12.
HilliardA.G. (1976). Alternative to IQ testing: An approach to the identification of gifted “minority” children. Final report to the California State Department of Education.
13.
Jenkins-FriedmanR. (1982). Myth: Cosmetic use of multiple selection criteria!Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 24–26.
14.
JohnsonST. (1979). The “measurement mystique.” Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Educational Policy.
15.
KarnesM.B., & BertschiJ.D. (1978). Identifying and educating gifted/talented non-handicapped and handicapped preschoolers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1978, 114–119.
16.
MartinsonR.A. (1974). The identification of the gifted and talented.Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent.
17.
MercerJ.B., & LewisJ.G. (1978). Using the System of Multicultural Assessment to identify the gifted minority child. In BaldwinA.Y., GearG.H., & LucitoL.J. (Eds.), Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers (pp. 7–14). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
18.
PassowA.H. (1972). The gifted and the disadvantaged. National Elementary Principal, 51(5), 24–31.
19.
PearceN. (1983). A comparison of the WISC-R, Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, and Meeker's SOI-Screening Form for Gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 13–18.
20.
RichartE.S., AlvinoJ.J., & McDonnelR.C. (1982). National report on identification.Sewell, NJ: Educational Improvement Center—South.
21.
RodellW.C., JacksonN.E., & RobinsonH.B. (1980). Gifted young children. In TannenbaumA.J. (Dir.) & NeumanE. (Ed.), Perspective on gifted and talented education (Part of a series). New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
SatoI.S. (1974). The culturally different gifted child—The dawning of his day. Exceptional Children, 40, 572–576.
23.
SeashoreH.G. (1963). The identification of the gifted. Test Service Bulletin (No. 55). New York: Psychological Corporation.
24.
TorranceE.P. (1973). Non-tests indicators of creative talent among disadvantaged children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 17, 3–9.
25.
TorranceE.P. (1977). Discovery and nurturance of giftedness in the culturally different.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
26.
WeberP., & BattagliaC. (1985). Reaching beyond identification through the “Identi-Form System.” Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 35–47.
27.
WhitmoreJ.R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
YarboroughB.H., & JohnsonR.A. (1983). Identifying the gifted: A theory-practice gap. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 135–138.