We investigated the associations between teacher-rated and direct assessments of early elementary students’ speech and language skills to explore whether using teachers as primary screeners yielded assessment data that reliably identified young students with language difficulties who many need a more comprehensive evaluation. We assessed first- and second-grade students (N = 365) on syntax, morphology, and vocabulary, screened for global speech and language development, and analyzed a teacher-completed norm-referenced communication rating scale. Teacher-rated language significantly predicted students’ latent language skills, and teachers’ ratings of students’ communication skills were not influenced by students’ gender, race/ethnicity, English language learner status, or special education status. We conclude with a discussion of implications for school-based research, assessment, and practice.
AntoniazziD.SnowP.Dickson-SwiftV. (2010). Teacher identification of children at risk for language impairment in the first year of school. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(3), 244–252.
2.
BishopD. V. M. (2003). The Children’s Communication Checklist, version 2 (CCC-2). Pearson Assessments.
3.
BishopD. V. M. (2006). The Children’s Communication Checklist, version 2 (CCC-2) US Edition. Pearson Assessments.
4.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (2014). Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language–Fourth Edition (TACL-4). Pro-Ed.
5.
ChowJ. C. (2018). Comorbid language and behavior problems: Development, frameworks, and intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 356–360.
6.
ChowJ. C.EkholmE.ColemanH. (2018). Does oral language underpin the development of later behavior problems? A longitudinal meta-analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 337–349.
7.
ChowJ. C.HolloA. (2018). Language ability of students with emotional disturbance: Discrepancies between teacher ratings and direct assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(2), 90–95.
8.
ChowJ. C.WallaceE. S. (2021). Speech-language pathologists’ behavior management training and reported experiences with challenging behavior. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 42, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740119887914
9.
ChowJ. C.WehbyJ. H. (2017). Profiles of problem behavior in children with varying language ability. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617733714
10.
ChowJ. C.WehbyJ. H. (2018). Associations between language and behavior: A systematic review and correlational meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 61–82.
11.
CohenN. J.DavineM.HorodezkyN.LipsettL.IsaacsonL. (1993). Unsuspected language impairment in psychiatrically disturbed children: Prevalence and language and behavioral characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
12.
CurtisP. R.FreyJ. R.WatsonC. D.HamptonL. H.RobertsM. Y. (2018). Language disorders and problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 142(2), Article e20173551.
13.
de RidderH.van der StegeH. (2004). Early detection of developmental language disorders. In VerhoevenL.van BalkomH. (Eds.), Classification of developmental language disorders: Theoretical issues and clinical implications (pp. 137–158). Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
GrigorenkoE.L. (2012) Language-Based Learning Disabilities. In SeelN.M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer, Boston, MA.
15.
HartB.RisleyT. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.
16.
HolloA.ChowJ. C.WehbyJ. H. (2019). Profiles of language and behavior in students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 44(4), 195-204.
17.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. (2004).
PhilofskyA.FidlerD. J.HepburnS. (2007). Pragmatic language profiles of school-age children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Williams Syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 368–380.
20.
RainesT. C.DeverB. V.KamphausR. W.RoachA. T. (2012). Universal screening for behavioral and emotional risk: A promising method for reducing disproportionate placement in special education. Journal of Negro Education, 81, 283–296.
21.
RedmondS. M. (2002). The use of rating scales with children who have language impairments. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(2), 124–138.
22.
RoweM. L.Goldin-MeadowS. (2009). Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science, 323(5916), 951–953.
23.
SimeonssonR.EdmondsonR.SmithT.CarnahanS.BucyJ. (1995). Family involvement in multidisciplinary team evaluation: Professional and parent perspectives. Child: Care, Health and Development, 21, 199–215.
24.
SkibaR.McLeskeyJ.WaldronN.GrizzleK.BartleyJ. (1993). The context of failure in the primary grades: Risk factors in low and high referral rate classrooms. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088837
25.
SunL.WallachG. P. (2014). Language disorders are learning disabilities: Challenges on the divergent and diverse paths to language learning disability. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(1), 25–38.
26.
TomblinJ. B.ZhangX.BuckwalterP.CattsH. (2000). The association of reading disability, behavioral disorders, and language impairment among second-grade children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 473–482.
27.
WiigE. H.SecordW. A.SemelE. (2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals: CELF-5. Pearson.
