Examining High School Student Engagement and Critical Factors in Dropout Prevention

Abstract

There is a well-known positive relation between student engagement and a host of school outcomes. The following article describes a study that explores a commonly used tool for measuring engagement in high schools. Specifically, this study examined internal validity, factor structure, and the relation between factors of engagement (e.g., social, emotional, and academic) and outcomes of school attendance and suspension rates. Data were collected for 7,718 students in ninth through 12th grade. Engagement was measured using the High School Survey of Student Engagement (HSSSE). Analyses raise concern over the degree to which the structure of HSSSE fits with established constructs of engagement. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

dropout early warning engagement high school prevention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allensworth

E. M.

Easton

J. Q.

(2007). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in Chicago public high schools: A close look at course grades, failures, and attendance in the freshman year (Research report). Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Betts

J. E.

Appleton

J. J.

Reschly

A. L.

Christenson

S. L.

Huebner

E. S.

(2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 84–93. doi:10.1037/a0020259

Catts

H. W.

Fey

M. E.

Zhang

Tomblin

J. B.

(2001). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331–361.

Center for Evaluation and Education Policy. (2018). National association of independent schools surveys: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://ceep.indiana.edu/nais/faq/index.html

Chalmers

P. R.

(2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i06

Enders

Bandalos

(2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0803_5

Fredricks

J. A.

McColskey

(2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In Christenson

S. L.

Reschly

A. L.

Wylie

(Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Boston, MA: Springer.

Fredricks

J. A.

McColskey

Meli

Mordica

Montrosse

Mooney

(2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011–098). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional, U.S. Department of Education.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.

10.

Hamre

B. K.

Pianta

R. C.

(2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967.

11.

Holzinger

K. J.

Swineford

(1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–54.

12.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.

13.

Jimerson

S. R.

Campos

Greif

J. L.

(2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.

14.

C. H.

(2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949.

15.

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/

16.

Reise

S. P.

(2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696.

17.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/

18.

Rumberger

Addis

Allensworth

Balfanz

Bruch

Dillon

. . . Tuttle

(2017). Preventing dropout in secondary schools (NCEE 2017-4028). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://whatworks.ed.gov

19.

Shernoff

D. J.

(2013). Measuring student engagement in high school classrooms and what we have learned. In Shernoff

D. J.

(Ed.), Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement: Advancing responsible adolescent development (pp 77–96). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7089-2_4

20.

Suh

(2007). Risk factors and levels of risk for high school dropouts. Professional School Counseling, 10, 297–306. doi:10.5330/prsc.10.3.w26024vvw6541gv7

21.

Taylor

B. M.

Pearson

P. D.

Peterson

D. S.

Rodriguez

M. C.

(2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104, 3–28.

22.

Therriault

S. B.

O’Cummings

Heppen

Yerhot

Scala

(2013). High school early warning intervention monitoring system implementation guide. Retrieved from https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/High-School-Early-Warning-Intervention-Implementation-Guide-March-2013.pdf

23.

United Statets Department of Education (2019). ED School Climate Survey (EDSCLS). Retrieved from https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/edscls/administration

24.

Wang

M.-T.

Fredricks

(2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85, 722–737. doi:10.1111/cdev.12138

25.

Yee

T. W.

(2015). Vector generalized linear and additive models: With an implementation in R. New York, NY: Springer.