The purpose of the present study was to conduct an initial validation of the Positive Family Support–Strengths and Needs Assessment (PFS-SaNA) for elementary school children. The PFS-SaNA is designed as a universal screener wherein parents report on common areas their children may need additional support. Parents of children attending one elementary school participated in two consecutive years. A total of 627 parents of elementary school children participated (Year 1 = 368, Year 2 = 259). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted across Years 1 and 2 and a replicability test compared item loadings from Year 1 and Year 2. Finally, evidence of external validity was examined. Results suggested the PFS-SaNA is unidimensional with findings indicating item loadings replicated from Year 1 to Year 2. Finally, evidence of external validity was found. Implications for the PFS-SaNA as a universal parent screener that can be embedded in a multiple gating risk management strategy in elementary school are discussed.
CattellR. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2, 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
2.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
3.
ColvinG.KameenuiE. J.SugaiG. (1993). Reconceptualizing behavior management and school-wide discipline in general education. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 361–381.
4.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
5.
DishionT. (2011). Promoting academic competence and behavioral health in public schools: A strategy of systemic concatenation of empirically based intervention principles. School Psychology Review, 40, 590–597. Available from http://apps.nasponline.org/
6.
DishionT. J.KavanaghK. (2003). Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
DodgeK. A.GreenbergM. T.MaloneP. S. (2008). Testing an idealized dynamic cascade model of the development of serious violence in adolescence. Child Development, 79, 1907–1927. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01233.x
8.
GarbaczS. A.McIntoshK.EagleJ. W.Dowd-EagleS. E.RuppertT.HiranoK. (2016). Family engagement within schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60, 60–69. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.976809
9.
GoodmanR. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
10.
HensonR. K.RobertsJ. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416. doi:10.1177/0013164405282485
11.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi:10.1007/bf02289447
12.
JenkinsL. N.DemarayM. K.WrenN. S.SecordS. M.LyellK. M.MagersA. M.. . . TennantJ. (2014). A critical review of five commonly used social-emotional and behavioral screeners for elementary or secondary schools. Contemporary School Psychology, 18, 241–254. doi:10.1007/s40688-014-0026-6
13.
KamphausR. W.ReynoldsC. R. (2015). BASC-3 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
14.
KataokaS. H.ZhangL.WellsK. B. (2002). Unmet need for mental health care among U.S. children: Variation by ethnicity and insurance status. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1548–1555.
15.
KilgusS. P.ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C. (2013). Development and initial validation of the social and academic behavior risk screener for elementary grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 210–226. doi:10.1037/spq0000024
16.
MastenA. S.RoismanG. I.LongJ. D.BurtK. B.ObradovićJ.RileyJ. R.. . . TellegenA. (2005). Developmental cascades: Linking academic achievement and externalizing and internalizing symptoms over 20 years. Developmental Psychology, 41, 733–746. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.733
17.
McDougalJ. L.BardosA. N.MeierS. T. (2011). Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System technical manual. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
18.
McIntoshK.ChardD. J.BolandJ. B.HornerR. H. (2006). Demonstration of combined efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 146–154. doi:10.1177/10983007060080030301
19.
McIntoshK.MassarM. M.AlgozzineR. F.GeorgeH. P.HornerR. H.LewisT. J.Swain-BradwayJ. (2017). Technical adequacy of the SWPBIS tiered fidelity inventory. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19, 3-13.
20.
MooreK. J.GarbaczS. A.GauJ. M.DishionT. J.BrownK. L.StormshakE. A.SeeleyJ. R. (2016). Proactive parent engagement in public schools: Using a brief strengths and needs assessment in a multiple-gating risk management strategy. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 230–240. doi:10.1177/1098300716632590
21.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
22.
OsborneJ. W.FitzpatrickD. C. (2012). Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(15), 1–8. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=15
23.
OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2015, October). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) implementation blueprint: Part 1—Foundations and supporting information. Eugene: University of Oregon. Available from http://www.pbis.org
24.
PattersonG. R.DeBarysheB.RamseyE. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.329
25.
SheridanS. M.KratochwillT. R. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family-school connections and interventions. New York, NY: Springer.
26.
SmolkowskiK.SeeleyJ. R.GauJ. M.DishionT. J.StormshakE. A.MooreK. J.. . . GarbaczS. A. (2017). Effectiveness evaluation of the Positive Family Support Intervention: A three-tiered public health delivery model for middle schools. Journal of School Psychology, 62, 103–125.
27.
SugaiG.HornerR. (1994). Including students with severe behavior problems in general education settings: Assumptions, challenges, and solutions. In MarrJ.SugaiG.TindalG. (Eds.), The Oregon conference monograph (Vol. 6, pp. 102–120). Eugene: University of Oregon.
28.
ThompsonB.DanielL. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197–208. doi:10.1177/0013164496056002001
29.
WalkerH. M.HornerR. H.SugaiG.BullisM.SpragueJ. R.BrickerD.KaufmanM. J. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194–209. doi:10.1177/106342669600400401
30.
WinslowE. B.BondsD.WolchikS.SandlerI.BraverS. (2009). Predictors of enrollment and retention in a preventive parenting intervention for divorced families. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 151–172.
